The ideological dilemma

[Freixel]

There is a dilemma to solve here

In fascist corporativism:

Is the high bourgeoisie controlled by the state or allied to the state?

Resolving this question is crucial to determining whether Fascism is a tool of elites or a genuine movement of the working class.

The answer to this question is what determines whether I am an NS or a Marxist Socialist.

Argument: Fascism feeds and gives power to Corporations where the worker continues to be positioned below the bourgeoisie in a position of disadvantage.

Argument: The Fascist State controls corporations in favor of the working class.

 

[Horatio NiggER bird]

Bookmarked, Will reply sometime later next week

 

[Incellectual]

They're allied to the state. They exist in a symbiotic relationship together, though there are stuggles between the two at times due to conflict of interest. They ultimately compromise though since the survival of both is vital for survival for both systems.

The high bourgeois generally do not view themselves as the same as the common man culturally. They ultimately look out for their own interests and don't particularly empathize with the groups they see as below them. They basically view and treat non-bourgeois as foreign-lite. Not the same as a true foreigner but they're viewed as different enough to not really be in the "in-group".

Fascism can be either pro-worker or pro-bourgeois depending on who's in charge and the culture of the nation. I find it tends to lean more pro-bourgeois since the bourgeois supply more resources to the state in the long run.



Honestly at the end of the day politics is pure cope. Pretty much every system gets taken over and ruined by sociopathic normies that turn it into an oligarchy. If you are a non-bourgeois ugly male you are going to be hated by any society or political system you are in. At best you will be used as a tool that will be discarded the millisecond you aren't useful.

 

[Freixel]

They're allied to the state. They exist in a symbiotic relationship together, though there are stuggles between the two at times due to conflict of interest. They ultimately compromise though since the survival of both is vital for survival for both systems.

The high bourgeois generally do not view themselves as the same as the common man culturally. They ultimately look out for their own interests and don't particularly empathize with the groups they see as below them. They basically view and treat non-bourgeois as foreign-lite. Not the same as a true foreigner but they're viewed as different enough to not really be in the "in-group".

Fascism can be either pro-worker or pro-bourgeois depending on who's in charge and the culture of the nation. I find it tends to lean more pro-bourgeois since the bourgeois supply more resources to the state in the long run.

So I'll stick with Marxist Socialism, at least it destroys the bourgeois class (or tries to)

I fuse it with ethnonationalism and masculinism and I have the perfect ideology for me.

 

[Incellectual]

So I'll stick with Marxist Socialism, at least it destroys the bourgeois class (or tries to)

I fuse it with ethnonationalism and masculinism and I have the perfect ideology for me.

Honestly if I were you I'd drop trying to ideologymaxx. I did that shit for years and all it did was make me miserable.

Plus I genuinly think it rots a lot of people's brains. Many people end up viewing reality in a really warped and delusional way because of it.

 

[Freixel]

Honestly if I were you I'd drop trying to ideologymaxx. I did that shit for years and all it did was make me miserable.

Plus I genuinly think it rots a lot of people's brains. Many people end up viewing reality in a really warped and delusional way because of it.

I do it for intellectual pleasure and for a reason to form my own philosophy and vision of the world.

I am also interested in things like history, religion, mythology, psychology, art, and of course sexuality

All these things together with a clear political vision give me my own worldview, at the end of the day it is what I am looking for.

To form my own "weltanschauung"

I am a seeker looking for answers

I do not seek to obey a psychopath with political power

 

[Incellectual]

I do it for intellectual pleasure and for a reason to form my own philosophy and vision of the world.

I am also interested in things like history, religion, mythology, psychology, art, and of course sexuality

All these things together with a clear political vision give me my own worldview, at the end of the day it is what I am looking for.

To form my own "weltanschauung"

I am a seeker looking for answers

I do not seek to obey a psychopath with political power

Based intrests tbh.

This post feels like something I'd write a couple years ago lol. I used to spend a lot of time reading and thinking about what the best ideology would be for me to follow and fight for. I eventually gave up though since I realized its an impossible task and incredibly improbable to instill whatever political or cultural change your goal is.

I still like these topics and don't want to discourage you from pursuing knowledge. I just think its better to approach it less ideologically and more neutrally (or at least attempting to since it's not possible to be 100% unbiased). Plus you end up being way more objective that way. I find people become way less objective if they try to identify with a particular ideology too hard.

At the very least try to not be too dogmatic with your ideology if you still want to go that route. It is possible to use ideologies as a mental frame work, it's just that shit hits the fan if you overly rely on it.

 

[Freixel]

Based intrests tbh.

This post feels like something I'd write a couple years ago lol. I used to spend a lot of time reading and thinking about what the best ideology would be for me to follow and fight for. I eventually gave up though since I realized its an impossible task and incredibly improbable to instill whatever political or cultural change your goal is.

I still like these topics and don't want to discourage you from pursuing knowledge. I just think its better to approach it less ideologically and more neutrally (or at least attempting to since it's not possible to be 100% unbiased). Plus you end up being way more objective that way. I find people become way less objective if they try to identify with a particular ideology too hard.

At the very least try to not be too dogmatic with your ideology if you still want to go that route. It is possible to use ideologies as a mental frame work, it's just that shit hits the fan if you overly rely on it.

I mean I'm as objective as I can be.

I am from the working class, I am going to support the ideological movements that fight for my class

If I had been born into a rich family with businesses I would probably be a Libertarian, since I would have developed little empathy for the working classes and would only seek the economic benefit of myself and my family.

I cannot be NS because the NS is Nordicist and I am not Nordic, I cannot be a Pure Communist because I also support nationalism and the protection of the cultural and ethnic identity of peoples, I cannot be a Fascist because it is a tool of the Burgess to deactivate revolutionary socialism

I can't be an anarchist because I think it's inapplicable.

I can't be a feminist... well for obvious reasons.

So I have no choice but to combine the best of each ideology (for me) and obtain my own vision.

This is something that fills me, it makes me feel less empty, there is an emotional aspect to all this too of course.

Furthermore, I want to have things clear and know who I can consider a companion in the adventure of life.