This isn’t true, and you really shouldn’t peddle fake buzzfeed “anthropology”
Height is not a factor in dating in many hunter-gatherer societies,
the view on what’s attractive, dimorphic etc. varies a lot depending on the time and place, that is because sexuality is mostly socially constructed; socialized. By saying taller men are superior, you’re only validating femoids’ opinions.
- Different phenotypes in different ethnic groups are suited to survive in their respective environment (no specific phenotype is an objective advantage).
- The invention of spears and other stone age weapons hundreds of thousands of years ago rendered differences in physical size almost completely irrelevant pertaining to man-to-man combat.
- Unlike modern cities, there is much less phenotypic variation within a hunter-gatherer group, so heightmogging tends to be extremely rare, and as I said earlier, being taller isn’t necessarily an advantage.
- And no, an extra 4 inches of spine bones isn’t gonna help you defeat a saber-toothed tiger.
I fucking hate retarded female logic and people making up bullshit pseudoscience about “cavemen times” (generalizing almost a million years of history of many different cultures in extremely different environments) to justify their own brand of modern notions of attractiveness.
Here are some facts,mFor example, in the hadza peoples relative size is not a considered factor in dating:
Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
slate.com