First of all, this is a completely theoretical discussion, I do not agree in any way with vigilante action. The proper way to finally solve the feminist problem is through getting anti-feminist politicians into office, politicians who will execute feminists, not through committing personal acts of violence.
But I was reading about vegan BS, and one of the main moral arguments against veganism is that animals did not enter into any kind of moral contract with humans, so we are entitled to treat them however we'd like, including eating them. Feminists have also not entered into any moral contract with society, by evidenced by the fact that they see it as an infringement of their rights to not be allowed to murder their own unborn children.
Thus, feminists are outside of the moral contract, they do not respect their own children's right to life, so the government should not respect theirs. Those who are not bound by the law do not deserve its protection.
But I was reading about vegan BS, and one of the main moral arguments against veganism is that animals did not enter into any kind of moral contract with humans, so we are entitled to treat them however we'd like, including eating them. Feminists have also not entered into any moral contract with society, by evidenced by the fact that they see it as an infringement of their rights to not be allowed to murder their own unborn children.
Thus, feminists are outside of the moral contract, they do not respect their own children's right to life, so the government should not respect theirs. Those who are not bound by the law do not deserve its protection.
