Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL The epidemic of alienated low-status men in society will be solved by MORE feminism/polyamory, fully eliminating the vestiges of patriarchal monogamy

Atavistic Autist

Atavistic Autist

Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
Joined
May 28, 2018
Posts
9,567
That's according to an autistic writer from the Netherlands whose blog I recently found. The argument that 8chan's /pol/ made against us, that incels are merely "disappointed feminists," is in reality attributable to this kind of person!

In his article, "Advice to Young Men: Find an Androgynous Woman," he says:

Consider all the essays by “feminist” women who complain about being asked in public transport what they’re reading. A genuine feminist essay would encourage women to feel comfortable seeking out guys on their own initiative, rather than complaining about guys who seek them out. The most feminist movie I’ve ever seen is American Beauty, because it revolves around a young woman who actively pursues an autistic guy, in spite of her hyperfeminine blonde friend insisting to her he’s a creep.


So... he thinks that the type of man who a woman would pursue on her own initiative in reality (Chad), is the same type of man who would ask a woman out on public transport (an autistic sub8)! This is a deeply mistaken presupposition, but it seems to inform his whole view on feminist issues.


Later in the same article, he writes:

We’ve lived for centuries in societies where most people’s marriages were essentially arranged for them and a few powerful men picked the prettiest women they could find. Repeat this over a hundred generations and you end up with a young woman who spends her days obsessively removing every blemish she can find on her face...

Today we’re liberated from this tragedy, but we’re not yet prepared for the freedom we now have. The woman still fantasizes about the prince on the white horse whose head was severed under the guillotine.


He actually thinks that modern society has diminished inequality, rather than maximized it! Chad's head was obviously not cut off by the guillotine of the Sexual Revolution -- Chad was enthroned by it -- and yet the writer imagines a future where the fruits of the Sexual Revolution will somehow trickle down: a "perfect" feminism where all women can truly be whores, and not just have tons of sex with Chad, but the desperate masses of sub8s too (the traditional clientele of prostitutes).


His naive conclusion:

The long-term end game we are reaching for, is complete liberation from traditional gender norms, in the manner envisioned by dissident Bolshevik Alexandra Kollontai, a woman who voluntarily renounced her noble privileges to marry a poor man she fell in love with.


The sexual history of the baldcel Lenin says all you need to know about this, especially now that pink capitalism has granted women economic independence and money is no longer the main motivating factor for their hypergamy.

There's a reason why Lenin effectively exiled Kollontai after the Bolshevik Revolution by making her ambassador to Sweden (it was as degenerate then as it is now).

---

In the post I linked above, about Lenin, I start off by saying that "proponents of radical ideologies in general will tend to be incel, because unlike normalfags, who have every reason to conform to the default mores of society, incels are driven to form critiques of the world around them."

This is the exact same argument that our autistic writer from the Netherlands makes in his article "Against ruining your life for a dumb cause":

It’s not coincidence that the vast majority of people who get sucked into these type of subcultures and terrorist movements are young hypermasculine men, without girlfriends or jobs. To blame Islam is silly, if we consider that suicide bombings were essentially non-existent until a few decades ago. What happened is that a toxic ideology found fertile ground in post-tribal societies where droves of young men found themselves living out lives that seemed to serve no traditional purpose. There are no opportunities for relationships with young women available to them and no opportunities to fight in tribal conflicts.


But dumb as dying for political copes may be, the writer's dream of an ideal feminist polyamory is an even dumber political cope which will just result in the genetic death of literally all sub8s:

What needs to happen is a cultural transition. We don’t just need to move to the kind of society where it’s possible for multiple men to share the same female partner. We also need to move towards the kind of society where men can have male partners, without ending up with a stigma that prohibits them from having female partners later on or simultaneously.


His comment about male-on-male partners has to do with his own bisexual feelings, it seems.
 
Last edited:
bionic cock surgery
 
While retarded, his writing raises a question: perhaps we are in the awkward transition phase between patriarchy and full feminist sexual communism. By the end of the process all the low tier males will be mtf trannies or gay while chad still gets all the females he could ever desire, and similarly the females are able to choose from a wide buffet of chad, performing tribal favours like foot pics to be supported by the soy underclass. Each woman will have many orbiters under their control to enshrine her position as the “ritterschaft” in the new aristocracy, while the “Junker” chads will have many women.
 
These fags act like we've transcended biology. Having a smartphone in your hand doesn't make you a cyborg. Polyamory was practiced in a very small number of societies. To pretend we can move 100s of millions of first world people into such a system is ludicrous.

Islam is not the cause of our problems, white leftards are.
 
Easily getting pretty whores to fuck would solve lack of sex, yes, but only PRETTY WHORES. But bigger problem, lack of love and friendship, is only increased by degeneracy spreading, I'm no cuck and will not share my waifu with other men
 
While retarded, his writing raises a question: perhaps we are in the awkward transition phase between patriarchy and full feminist sexual communism. By the end of the process all the low tier males will be mtf trannies or gay while chad still gets all the females he could ever desire, and similarly the females are able to choose from a wide buffet of chad, performing tribal favours like foot pics to be supported by the soy underclass. Each woman will have many orbiters under their control to enshrine her position as the “ritterschaft” in the new aristocracy, while the “Junker” chads will have many women.

I see this reality in existence now. Not in the future & the rebels like us are the outcasts so to speak.
 
While retarded, his writing raises a question: perhaps we are in the awkward transition phase between patriarchy and full feminist sexual communism. By the end of the process all the low tier males will be mtf trannies or gay while chad still gets all the females he could ever desire, and similarly the females are able to choose from a wide buffet of chad, performing tribal favours like foot pics to be supported by the soy underclass. Each woman will have many orbiters under their control to enshrine her position as the “ritterschaft” in the new aristocracy, while the “Junker” chads will have many women.
This is literally feudalism 2.0.
Bunch of unelected privileged people ruling over peasants who satisfy themselves with scraps from the dinner tables of their lords(or mistresses,in this case)
 
While retarded, his writing raises a question: perhaps we are in the awkward transition phase between patriarchy and full feminist sexual communism. By the end of the process all the low tier males will be mtf trannies or gay while chad still gets all the females he could ever desire, and similarly the females are able to choose from a wide buffet of chad, performing tribal favours like foot pics to be supported by the soy underclass. Each woman will have many orbiters under their control to enshrine her position as the “ritterschaft” in the new aristocracy, while the “Junker” chads will have many women.
unlikely. Though perhaps that is the future our corporate largely Jewish plutocratic overlords envision, once a society's concepts crucial to understanding human nature such as the dichotomy between the masculine and the feminine become muddied or otherwise confused, the expiration date of said society is rapidly approaching. There will come a second Noah's flood or a second obliteration of Sodom and Gomorrah if you will, wherein nature's wrath will cull the superfluous niggercattle and from the ashes of society's complete obliteration a new beginning will arise.
 
sex doesn't count if you're small or ugly or have to grovel through feminism and polyamory, this is why such men are called virgin losers by instinct, they get sex through illegitimate means and so they're still virgins

make open relationships accepted and these subhumans won't have the advantage anymore, same with the 60s revolution, women gave losers sex until chad accepted sexual liberation, then it was over
 
DeformAspergerCel
 
I stopped reading after the first quote you pulled. Debating what feminism is or requires, or starting from a supposition about same, seems like a losing proposition. Ultimately, women are just after the maximum of personal autonomy with the minimum of responsibility or consequences. "Feminism" is not really a helpful lens through which to see social shifts in gender roles imho.
 
If women approach the sub 8 to have sex, that would be fine. But it will never happen, that would go against women's freedom :soy: since the only way to get that behavior in women is to indoctrinate them in schools and that will never happen. Holes only approach chads or some decent betabux for precisely betabux.
 
His comment about male-on-male partners has to do with his own bisexual feelings, it seems.
He is basically telling incels to fuck each other while Chad gets all women.
 
Written by a White Male, I'm not surprised.
 
Each woman will have many orbiters under their control to enshrine her position as the “ritterschaft” in the new aristocracy, while the “Junker” chads will have many women.

Librium IQ
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
24
Views
696
Horatio Prime Kanga
Horatio Prime Kanga
Stupid Clown
Replies
42
Views
643
SocialOutkast95
SocialOutkast95
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
8
Views
344
BPJ
BPJ
FrenchcelNeverbegan
Replies
22
Views
455
DeadOnArrivalCel
DeadOnArrivalCel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top