That's according to an autistic writer from the Netherlands whose blog I recently found. The argument that 8chan's /pol/ made against us, that incels are merely "disappointed feminists," is in reality attributable to this kind of person!
In his article, "Advice to Young Men: Find an Androgynous Woman," he says:
So... he thinks that the type of man who a woman would pursue on her own initiative in reality (Chad), is the same type of man who would ask a woman out on public transport (an autistic sub8)! This is a deeply mistaken presupposition, but it seems to inform his whole view on feminist issues.
Later in the same article, he writes:
He actually thinks that modern society has diminished inequality, rather than maximized it! Chad's head was obviously not cut off by the guillotine of the Sexual Revolution -- Chad was enthroned by it -- and yet the writer imagines a future where the fruits of the Sexual Revolution will somehow trickle down: a "perfect" feminism where all women can truly be whores, and not just have tons of sex with Chad, but the desperate masses of sub8s too (the traditional clientele of prostitutes).
His naive conclusion:
The sexual history of the baldcel Lenin says all you need to know about this, especially now that pink capitalism has granted women economic independence and money is no longer the main motivating factor for their hypergamy.
There's a reason why Lenin effectively exiled Kollontai after the Bolshevik Revolution by making her ambassador to Sweden (it was as degenerate then as it is now).
---
In the post I linked above, about Lenin, I start off by saying that "proponents of radical ideologies in general will tend to be incel, because unlike normalfags, who have every reason to conform to the default mores of society, incels are driven to form critiques of the world around them."
This is the exact same argument that our autistic writer from the Netherlands makes in his article "Against ruining your life for a dumb cause":
But dumb as dying for political copes may be, the writer's dream of an ideal feminist polyamory is an even dumber political cope which will just result in the genetic death of literally all sub8s:
His comment about male-on-male partners has to do with his own bisexual feelings, it seems.
In his article, "Advice to Young Men: Find an Androgynous Woman," he says:
So... he thinks that the type of man who a woman would pursue on her own initiative in reality (Chad), is the same type of man who would ask a woman out on public transport (an autistic sub8)! This is a deeply mistaken presupposition, but it seems to inform his whole view on feminist issues.
Later in the same article, he writes:
He actually thinks that modern society has diminished inequality, rather than maximized it! Chad's head was obviously not cut off by the guillotine of the Sexual Revolution -- Chad was enthroned by it -- and yet the writer imagines a future where the fruits of the Sexual Revolution will somehow trickle down: a "perfect" feminism where all women can truly be whores, and not just have tons of sex with Chad, but the desperate masses of sub8s too (the traditional clientele of prostitutes).
His naive conclusion:
The sexual history of the baldcel Lenin says all you need to know about this, especially now that pink capitalism has granted women economic independence and money is no longer the main motivating factor for their hypergamy.
There's a reason why Lenin effectively exiled Kollontai after the Bolshevik Revolution by making her ambassador to Sweden (it was as degenerate then as it is now).
---
In the post I linked above, about Lenin, I start off by saying that "proponents of radical ideologies in general will tend to be incel, because unlike normalfags, who have every reason to conform to the default mores of society, incels are driven to form critiques of the world around them."
This is the exact same argument that our autistic writer from the Netherlands makes in his article "Against ruining your life for a dumb cause":
But dumb as dying for political copes may be, the writer's dream of an ideal feminist polyamory is an even dumber political cope which will just result in the genetic death of literally all sub8s:
His comment about male-on-male partners has to do with his own bisexual feelings, it seems.
Last edited:
since the only way to get that behavior in women is to indoctrinate them in schools and that will never happen. Holes only approach chads or some decent betabux for precisely betabux.
