Atavistic Autist
Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Posts
- 9,567
That's according to an autistic writer from the Netherlands whose blog I recently found. The argument that 8chan's /pol/ made against us, that incels are merely "disappointed feminists," is in reality attributable to this kind of person!
In his article, "Advice to Young Men: Find an Androgynous Woman," he says:
So... he thinks that the type of man who a woman would pursue on her own initiative in reality (Chad), is the same type of man who would ask a woman out on public transport (an autistic sub8)! This is a deeply mistaken presupposition, but it seems to inform his whole view on feminist issues.
Later in the same article, he writes:
He actually thinks that modern society has diminished inequality, rather than maximized it! Chad's head was obviously not cut off by the guillotine of the Sexual Revolution -- Chad was enthroned by it -- and yet the writer imagines a future where the fruits of the Sexual Revolution will somehow trickle down: a "perfect" feminism where all women can truly be whores, and not just have tons of sex with Chad, but the desperate masses of sub8s too (the traditional clientele of prostitutes).
His naive conclusion:
The sexual history of the baldcel Lenin says all you need to know about this, especially now that pink capitalism has granted women economic independence and money is no longer the main motivating factor for their hypergamy.
There's a reason why Lenin effectively exiled Kollontai after the Bolshevik Revolution by making her ambassador to Sweden (it was as degenerate then as it is now).
---
In the post I linked above, about Lenin, I start off by saying that "proponents of radical ideologies in general will tend to be incel, because unlike normalfags, who have every reason to conform to the default mores of society, incels are driven to form critiques of the world around them."
This is the exact same argument that our autistic writer from the Netherlands makes in his article "Against ruining your life for a dumb cause":
But dumb as dying for political copes may be, the writer's dream of an ideal feminist polyamory is an even dumber political cope which will just result in the genetic death of literally all sub8s:
His comment about male-on-male partners has to do with his own bisexual feelings, it seems.
In his article, "Advice to Young Men: Find an Androgynous Woman," he says:
Consider all the essays by “feminist” women who complain about being asked in public transport what they’re reading. A genuine feminist essay would encourage women to feel comfortable seeking out guys on their own initiative, rather than complaining about guys who seek them out. The most feminist movie I’ve ever seen is American Beauty, because it revolves around a young woman who actively pursues an autistic guy, in spite of her hyperfeminine blonde friend insisting to her he’s a creep.
So... he thinks that the type of man who a woman would pursue on her own initiative in reality (Chad), is the same type of man who would ask a woman out on public transport (an autistic sub8)! This is a deeply mistaken presupposition, but it seems to inform his whole view on feminist issues.
Later in the same article, he writes:
We’ve lived for centuries in societies where most people’s marriages were essentially arranged for them and a few powerful men picked the prettiest women they could find. Repeat this over a hundred generations and you end up with a young woman who spends her days obsessively removing every blemish she can find on her face...
Today we’re liberated from this tragedy, but we’re not yet prepared for the freedom we now have. The woman still fantasizes about the prince on the white horse whose head was severed under the guillotine.
He actually thinks that modern society has diminished inequality, rather than maximized it! Chad's head was obviously not cut off by the guillotine of the Sexual Revolution -- Chad was enthroned by it -- and yet the writer imagines a future where the fruits of the Sexual Revolution will somehow trickle down: a "perfect" feminism where all women can truly be whores, and not just have tons of sex with Chad, but the desperate masses of sub8s too (the traditional clientele of prostitutes).
His naive conclusion:
The long-term end game we are reaching for, is complete liberation from traditional gender norms, in the manner envisioned by dissident Bolshevik Alexandra Kollontai, a woman who voluntarily renounced her noble privileges to marry a poor man she fell in love with.
The sexual history of the baldcel Lenin says all you need to know about this, especially now that pink capitalism has granted women economic independence and money is no longer the main motivating factor for their hypergamy.
There's a reason why Lenin effectively exiled Kollontai after the Bolshevik Revolution by making her ambassador to Sweden (it was as degenerate then as it is now).
---
In the post I linked above, about Lenin, I start off by saying that "proponents of radical ideologies in general will tend to be incel, because unlike normalfags, who have every reason to conform to the default mores of society, incels are driven to form critiques of the world around them."
This is the exact same argument that our autistic writer from the Netherlands makes in his article "Against ruining your life for a dumb cause":
It’s not coincidence that the vast majority of people who get sucked into these type of subcultures and terrorist movements are young hypermasculine men, without girlfriends or jobs. To blame Islam is silly, if we consider that suicide bombings were essentially non-existent until a few decades ago. What happened is that a toxic ideology found fertile ground in post-tribal societies where droves of young men found themselves living out lives that seemed to serve no traditional purpose. There are no opportunities for relationships with young women available to them and no opportunities to fight in tribal conflicts.
But dumb as dying for political copes may be, the writer's dream of an ideal feminist polyamory is an even dumber political cope which will just result in the genetic death of literally all sub8s:
What needs to happen is a cultural transition. We don’t just need to move to the kind of society where it’s possible for multiple men to share the same female partner. We also need to move towards the kind of society where men can have male partners, without ending up with a stigma that prohibits them from having female partners later on or simultaneously.
His comment about male-on-male partners has to do with his own bisexual feelings, it seems.
Last edited: