P
Payer
Recruit
★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2017
- Posts
- 302
Some queen was cucking her king during the 14th century:
www.telegraph.co.uk
Imagine your whole legacy going down the shitter due to your wife cucking you and giving birth to some bastard offspring which will carry on your name but not your genetics.
Literally cucking your genes out of the human gene pool.
In order to prove that the bones really were Richard III's, scientists needed to take a DNA sample and match it to his descendants.
Genetic testing through his maternal DNA proved conclusively that the body was the king's. However, when they checked the male line — the unnamed descendants of Henry Somerset, the 5th Duke of Beaufort — they discovered something odd. The DNA did not match Richard's, meaning that at some point in history an adulterous affair had broken the paternal chain.
Although it is impossible to say when the affair happened, if it occurred around the time of Edward III (1312–1377) it could call into question whether kings such as Henry VI, Henry VII and Henry VIII had royal blood, and, therefore, the right to rule.
Richard III DNA shows British Royal family may not have royal bloodline
When the skeleton of Richard III was discovered in a car park in Leicester in 2012, archaeologists knew it was a momentous find.

Imagine your whole legacy going down the shitter due to your wife cucking you and giving birth to some bastard offspring which will carry on your name but not your genetics.
Literally cucking your genes out of the human gene pool.