Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The difference between face and height

S

Soulflayer

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 6, 2023
Posts
9,324
Having a good looking face with a shit height is like eating lots of protein, but not lifting weights = zero results

Having a shit face with a tall height is like lifting weights, but not eating much protein = still gets decent results
 
Having a good face will absolutely get you results, especially if not a framelet. :feelsjuice:
 
Having a good face will absolutely get you results, especially if not a framelet. :feelsjuice:
If you’re 5’9 or more yes. I said shit height not mediocre height.
 
In some asian shithole maybe. Definitely not in europe
You would be able to ascend at the very least, even with a Becky depending on the actual face. :feelshehe:
 
No face for 5'5 and below men:feelsrope::feelsrope:
@unique_freak
 
Being NT is more important than both face and height.
 
Having a good face will absolutely get you results, especially if not a framelet. :feelsjuice:
Height makes up for lack of face far more than face makes up for lack of height.
 
A guy who is 5'5" or shorter won't get a pretty girlfriend no matter how handsome he is.
 
Provide an example of that. :feelsjuice:
You don't even have to look at the dating world. Just look at the realm of business and politics.

  • Surveys have uncovered that less than 3% of CEOs were below 1.70 m (5 ft 7 in) in height. 90% of CEOs are of above average height.
  • a study published in the Journal of Political Economy conjectured a "height premium" and found that "a 1.8-percent increase in wages accompanies every additional inch of height".
  • They also found that men's wages as adults could be linked to their height at age 16. The researchers found that on an average an increase in height by one inch at age 16 increased male adult wages by 2.6 percent.
  • research by Dan Ariely found that American women exhibit a marked preference for dating taller men, and that for shorter men to be judged attractive by women, they must earn substantially more money than taller men


The only way manlets attract women is if they moneymaxxx, but they're unlikely to outearn their tall counterparts because of height discrimination. It's a vicious cycle. People meme here by saying it's over for 5 foot 9 dudes. In reality there is a real cut off (it's around 5 foot 4) where it is well and truly OVER.
 
You don't even have to look at the dating world. Just look at the realm of business and politics.

  • Surveys have uncovered that less than 3% of CEOs were below 1.70 m (5 ft 7 in) in height. 90% of CEOs are of above average height.
  • a study published in the Journal of Political Economy conjectured a "height premium" and found that "a 1.8-percent increase in wages accompanies every additional inch of height".
  • They also found that men's wages as adults could be linked to their height at age 16. The researchers found that on an average an increase in height by one inch at age 16 increased male adult wages by 2.6 percent.
  • research by Dan Ariely found that American women exhibit a marked preference for dating taller men, and that for shorter men to be judged attractive by women, they must earn substantially more money than taller men


The only way manlets attract women is if they moneymaxxx, but they're unlikely to outearn their tall counterparts because of height discrimination. It's a vicious cycle. People meme here by saying it's over for 5 foot 9 dudes. In reality there is a real cut off (it's around 5 foot 4) where it is well and truly OVER.
Obviously the heightpill exists and the top heads of corporations and businesses are bound to be taller, wealthier and mogging most with both looks and height, but manlets can also make up for it with a good face; the cutoff seems to be 5'5/5'6 for normies and below, depending on exact geographical location, but face matters in conjunction. :feelsclown:
 
The key difference is that height provides functional advantages while face provides aesthetic advantages. When push comes to shove, you want to be tall.

short + athletic + handsome = often disrespected

tall + athletic + ugly = rarely disrespected
 
In my useless and not asked for experience, being above average height with all my other disabilities hasn't done me any favours.
 

Similar threads

Notkev
Replies
93
Views
843
ElTruecel
ElTruecel
Blackpillologist
Replies
37
Views
1K
prajeet88
prajeet88
spermretentionmax
Replies
34
Views
528
spermretentionmax
spermretentionmax
Five Dozen Eggs
Replies
7
Views
377
_meh
_meh
D
Replies
27
Views
779
based_meme
B

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top