Serious The deaths of the Toronto van killer are on the media's hands

[Deleted member 22572]

>AM had autism
>He saw memes on 4chan about incels
>4chan users don't actually know what incels really are because of media articles mischaracterizing us
>so 4chan users make memes about incels (from their view of what an incel is which the media shaped for them)
>AM sees these 4chan memes about "incels"
>Misinterprets the memes and takes them seriously because of his autism
>Kills ppl
>Wouldn'tve happened if the media didn't mischaracterize incels so badly in the first place

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

4chan is for cucks, scientifically speaking.

 

[Deleted member 33216]

4chan is full of normies these days. It's not what it used to be. If you've seen the interview of AM, you'll quickly realize he's not one of us. I used to think he was an incel, just like the rest of us, until I watched the full interview of him. He doesn't seem to understand the terms he's using. He was just regurgitating what most 4chan users normally say. He is ugly, yes. That alone would make him an incel by definition, but he didn't kill because of his inceldom. ER on the other hand, went haywire because of his celibate virgin status, which would make him an "incel killer". AM is the embodiment of 4chan, not really an incel (though by definition he is, but if you operate based off of definitions then many non-incel killers are incels - e.g. Unabomber). That being said, I don't care for the people he killed, but I don't condone violence either. But to say he was an incel as in he killed due to his inceldom is a shallow argument.

 

[Deleted member 22572]

4chan is full of normies these days. It's not what it used to be. If you've seen the interview of AM, you'll quickly realize he's not one of us. I used to think he was an incel, just like the rest of us, until I watched the full interview of him. He doesn't seem to understand the terms he's using. He was just regurgitating what most 4chan users normally say. He is ugly, yes. That alone would make him an incel by definition, but he didn't kill because of his inceldom. ER on the other hand, went haywire because of his celibate virgin status, which would make him an "incel killer". AM is the embodiment of 4chan, not really an incel (though by definition he is, but if you operate based off of definitions then many non-incel killers are incels - e.g. Unabomber). That being said, I don't care for the people he killed, but I don't condone violence either. But to say he was an incel as in he killed due to his inceldom is a shallow argument.

Agred

 

[Deleted member 33464]

AM is the embodiment of 4chan

Ah yes, the notorious van killer known as four chan

 

[Shigechi]

AM was just attention whoring, he didn't killed because of inceldom, the judge of his case confirms it.

 

[Deleted member 22572]

AM was just attention whoring, he didn't killed because of inceldom, the judge of his case confirms it.

Ded srs? Well the media also has to blame for that then.

 

[Indari]

true. they have an incentive to portray incels sensationally as monsters. just like they do school shooters. they will only create more ERs from losers who want to be famous and more innocent incels will get harmed as collateral damage as society eyes them with suspicion