OP was too high-inhib to quote from this article but I'm not.
Rosie DiManno said:
A toddler sits at the woman's feet, his small hands holding on to either leg.
In this position, the woman — naked below the waist — masturbates using a baby bottle.
The toddler, giggling, then grabs the bottle and drinks from it.
The woman looks directly into the camera and smiles.
That was one video seized by police from the Toronto home where the woman lived with her husband.
On another video, the same woman is lying in bed with the same toddler. Both are naked. She begins to lick the child's anus. Looking at the camera, she smacks her lips.
A third video: The little boy is seated naked on a change table. The woman puts the child's penis into her mouth. The child giggles.
In all, investigators discovered 25,066 child pornography images on more than 50 electronic devices when they executed a search warrant on April 25, 2016, including 111 child porn movies.
While all three examples are weird, TBH it doesn't sound like anyone would be permanently scarred by that.
Think of how much worse circumcision is. I barely give a fuck about tame CP like this as long as we haven't banned circumcision.
When a drunk mohel puts his mouth on the penis of a week-old baby boy (meziza b'peh) after flaying off the skin with a scalpel, that boy sure as hell isn't going to giggle like in this film.
I'm all for gender equality and shit, and women who violate the law to abuse babies shouldn't get a free pass, but right now the primary problem is jews getting a free pass on a far more damaging ritual.
A ritual with so many victims that we can't even acknowledge the victimhood, a ritual which somehow made it into mainstream hospitals because of golems pushing it as some kind of decades-in-advance prophylactic for syphalis.
Reading Caldwell's reaction to Pierce, the argument doesn't seem to be "because she's a woman" but rather "because she's a sub". IE she doesn't actually want to lick baby-anus, she just wants to do anything humiliating in front of her domme.
While that COULD be true, my guess is they wouldn't accept that argument from a male submissive, so there is definitely a gender component worth weighing here.
But again: jews first, there isn't an organized society of submissive female baby-anus-lickers out there ritualistically abusing entire new generations of young boys the way that mohels do. Mohels deserve most of our efforts.
They are at the core of much of the degeneracy being pushed here. You don't think they're involved with spreading BDSM or stoking the fires of escalation in those communities?
Think about this: isn't the wind potentially taken out of the sails of good people's efforts to condemn degeneracy because of the sinking feeling deep down that there's a greater evil out there which we tolerate?
Their job is to fight evil wherever it hides, but they don't.
Pick the location you'll never even hear them mention, because to fight darkness is to fight yourself.
www.thespec.com
