Blackpill The concept of "looksmatch" is fundamentally flawed

[Deleted member 45467]

because female beauty is so subjective your "3/10" looksmatch can very in fact be as much as an 8/10 in another guy's eyes. And ultimately, people like whoever they like, they aint gonna bother thinking of ratings and shit like that, they let the hormones do all the talk. There are no women for incels sadly, no looksmatch, no anything, we are meant to be alone.

 

[RandomBroCel]

well ye. But in objectively its not flawed. Women are entitled and spoiled and men are pathetic simps

 

[Deleted member 45467]

well ye. But in objectively its not flawed. Women are entitled and spoiled and men are pathetic simps

there is no objective beauty lmao. most girls posted here as beauties are invisible to me

 

[PLA1092]

It's not as subjective as you think, in my opinion...

Plenty of universal features either disliked or liked by the vast majority, so I doubt a 3/10 could become a 8/10, but perhaps you've been influenced by bluepillers to think that "everyone likes something!!".

 

[RandomBroCel]

It's not as subjective as you think, in my opinion...

Plenty of universal features either disliked or liked, so I doubt a 3/10 could become a 8/10, but perhaps you've been influenced by bluepillers to think that "everyone likes something!!".

yes, majority of people are similar and like similar things. Thats why we have concepts like societal norms, customs, whats normal or not normal. Bcs majority agrees with certain beliefes, ways etc

 

[Deleted member 45467]

Plenty of universal features either disliked or liked by the vast majority, so I doubt a 3/10 could become a 8/10, but perhaps you've been influenced by bluepillers to think that "everyone likes something!!"

my oneittis was rated 3/10 by some guys and 6/10 by others on this forum lmao. so much for your objectivity

 

[PLA1092]

my oneittis was rated 3/10 by some guys and 6/10 by others on this forum lmao. so much for your objectivity

That's a more reasonable difference, but if introduced to a larger audience one or two scores would likely prevail...

I'm not saying it's completely objective.

 

[willystroker]

You're correct it's subjective. There's a baseline (what could be called objective looks) but much of one's attractiveness is determined by what it's compared to and the context it's compared in. When women are looking at your photo on a dating app for 0.2 seconds after swiping through thousands of men in the last hour, she'll of course perceive you very close to your baseline.

The other extreme is when you live in an isolated village where every woman has known you since childhood. It still doesn't guarantee they'll all find you attractive, but due to being used to you and not having many other men to compare to, you'll be perceived much better. This is the kind of environment where your "looksmatch" should be a viable option.

But since the latter environment is so hard to end up in, most young men now have to date down to have a chance.

 

[Oroborus]

It doesn't take into account your real smv.
Wome can fraud their looks easily and stay on a normal weight to be attractive.
looksmatches don't take height and frame into account.
A man's looksmatch is a Stacy in comparision to his smvv
it doesn't matter that soys inflate women's value

 

[BlackPilledOverdose]

Female beauty is objective not subjective.

 

[Detro]

because female beauty is so subjective your "3/10" looksmatch can very in fact be as much as an 8/10 in another guy's eyes.

Beauty is not that subjective.
You're confusing men taking what they can get ( with some heavy pair bonding on top ) for them being blind to facial attractiveness.