Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The common rebuttals we suffer, and their type of logical fallacy identified

The End

The End

Banned
-
Joined
Apr 17, 2018
Posts
4,444
If we say something like, "Geez, it sure is hard getting dates," it's like we told everyone to go fuck themselves. And so we are attacked with these mean-spirited and dismissive rebuttals.
  • "You know people in Africa are starving!" (red herring),
  • "If you had really tried you would have been successful!" (affirming the consequent),
  • "Well everyone else is getting dates so it's just your own fault!" (sweeping generalization),
  • "If you keep trying eventually you'll get a girlfriend." (gambler's fallacy),
  • "Have you asked out every girl in the world - if not, you're not really involuntarily celibate!" (moving the goalpost),
  • "Women aren't evil creatures!" (moralistic),
  • "I've seen people as ugly as you with girlfriends." (cherry picking),
  • "People have been having sex since the dawn of time, including your parents, so the fault isn't your ugliness." (survivorship bias),
  • "Your toxic masculinity is preventing you from getting laid." (proof surrogate),
  • "You're a bad person." (ad-hominem),
  • etc etc etc
If what we are saying is true - that some people are just un-fuckable and un-lovable - then that means that life isn't fair, and everything they have is undeserved and could be robbed from them at anytime. Most people at least pseudo know this already, but their core beliefs and ego make them attack us on instinct.

If they were so sure of their rightness instead of stamping out the mere possibility of what we say being true, they would instead be interested in how this strange occurrences of involuntary celibacy came to be.

Feel free to add more of the common come-backs we receive when we complain.

(Edit/Disclaimer) I'm no expert in logic, I just have a mild interest in it, mostly because no one else seems to use it. I may have not identified the most apt fallacy for each example, partly because most of these rebuttals commit multiple fallacies, and I just choose the one that seemed closest.
(edit#2) @Mahlo gave me a few corrections of the fallacies committed, and I have updated the list with his corrections. Thanks! This is probably the last time I can edit this top post, so this is the list for better or worse now.
 
Last edited:
just wash your penis, bucko
 
“There are 3 billion women in the world”

This balls to the wall level retarded freezing temperature IQ argument is way too common
 
Newton IQ with naming their fallacies!!
Every incel should read this to understand how normies and chads are bullshitting incels with their lies.
Mods, please pin this thread!
 
Why lol

The time for argumentation has passed
 
Tesla IQ thread.
 
You know, people are in Africa starving.
 
"It's natural selection"
Female sexual selection isn't what built civilization, the exact opposite is true. Without some level of enforced monogamy, we'd never haved stopped being hunter gatherers. All these "progressives" are simply disguised nature worshipers, with a few civilization destroying saboteurs leading them on.
 
"If you had really tried you would have been successful!"
Also No true scotsman.

"Have you asked out every girl in the world - if not, you're not really involuntarily celibate!"
There's a better name for this fallacy other than strawman. Moving the goalposts I think

"I've seen people as ugly as you with girlfriends."
this is cherry picking

"People have been having sex since the dawn of time, including your parents, so the fault isn't your ugliness."
I would argue this is closer to survivorship bias, not appeal to antiquity. (Which is a type of cherry picking)

"You're a bad person." and "Your toxic masculinity is preventing you from getting laid."
Technically not a fallacy if it's applied to why you can't get laid. (If it were applied to why you're wrong, it would be a fallacy)In that case it would just be a hypothesis, which is proven wrong through evidence.
 
“There are 3 billion women in the world”

This balls to the wall level retarded freezing temperature IQ argument is way too common
It's impossible to meet 3 billion people in a life time
Haha! Yeh, how could I forget the ol' classic haircut and shower. Obviously that's false because they assume we haven't tried that already (WHY????).
"You should shower and get a haircut 24 times a day" :soy:
 
"If you had really tried you would have been successful!"
Also No true scotsman.

"Have you asked out every girl in the world - if not, you're not really involuntarily celibate!"
There's a better name for this fallacy other than strawman. Moving the goalposts I think

"I've seen people as ugly as you with girlfriends."
this is cherry picking

"People have been having sex since the dawn of time, including your parents, so the fault isn't your ugliness."
I would argue this is closer to survivorship bias, not appeal to antiquity. (Which is a type of cherry picking)

"You're a bad person." and "Your toxic masculinity is preventing you from getting laid."
Technically not a fallacy if it's applied to why you can't get laid. (If it were applied to why you're wrong, it would be a fallacy)In that case it would just be a hypothesis, which is proven wrong through evidence.
I believe you are right, I'll change the start of the thread this one time.
 
if a male complains or critizies society in any way, he's automatically:

- possible rapist
- entitled
- a pedo (default insult)

it's like when the police shout "stop resisting" when you're on the ground, getting beaten and unable to even move
 
African people are having more sex than us so that "argument" doesn't even make sense
You guys are too sensitive lol. it wasn't argument,it was memeing,did you even read OP?
 
You guys are too sensitive lol. it wasn't argument,it was memeing,did you even read OP?
Yes, I told him to make this topic.
You have trouble understanding English?
 
Damn you read OP

I do understand everything. And I don't give fuck whoever did this, anyway i don't have to explain it again
enough lets not fight over fucking memes god damit
 
This is my response to fallacious :bluepill: :soy:

 
"arranged partnerships are the Handmaids Tale"
slippery slope fallacy

"so its the whole world that are wrong about x and not incels, huh?"
bandwagon fallacy

"you cant find someone because you hate women"
causal fallacy

"you are just too ugly to have standards, your whole worldview is just ridiculous"
tu quoque fallacy and ad hominem

"theres no good reason to give up at this point"
sunk cost fallacy

"love shyness isnt real because Brian Gilmartin is fringe"
appeal to authority, red herring
 
Last edited:
If we say something like, "Geez, it sure is hard getting dates," it's like we told everyone to go fuck themselves. And so we are attacked with these mean-spirited and dismissive rebuttals.
  • "You know people in Africa are starving!" (red herring),
  • "If you had really tried you would have been successful!" (affirming the consequent),
  • "Well everyone else is getting dates so it's just your own fault!" (sweeping generalization),
  • "If you keep trying eventually you'll get a girlfriend." (gambler's fallacy),
  • "Have you asked out every girl in the world - if not, you're not really involuntarily celibate!" (moving the goalpost),
  • "Women aren't evil creatures!" (moralistic),
  • "I've seen people as ugly as you with girlfriends." (cherry picking),
  • "People have been having sex since the dawn of time, including your parents, so the fault isn't your ugliness." (survivorship bias),
  • "Your toxic masculinity is preventing you from getting laid." (proof surrogate),
  • "You're a bad person." (ad-hominem),
  • etc etc etc
If what we are saying is true - that some people are just un-fuckable and un-lovable - then that means that life isn't fair, and everything they have is undeserved and could be robbed from them at anytime. Most people at least pseudo know this already, but their core beliefs and ego make them attack us on instinct.

If they were so sure of their rightness instead of stamping out the mere possibility of what we say being true, they would instead be interested in how this strange occurrences of involuntary celibacy came to be.

Feel free to add more of the common come-backs we receive when we complain.

(Edit/Disclaimer) I'm no expert in logic, I just have a mild interest in it, mostly because no one else seems to use it. I may have not identified the most apt fallacy for each example, partly because most of these rebuttals commit multiple fallacies, and I just choose the one that seemed closest.
(edit#2) @Mahlo gave me a few corrections of the fallacies committed, and I have updated the list with his corrections. Thanks! This is probably the last time I can edit this top post, so this is the list for better or worse now.

This is good. Thanks. Yes it is as you say.
Go after just world fallacy.
"arranged partnerships are the Handmaids Tale"
slippery slope fallacy

"so its the whole world that are wrong about x and not incels, huh?"
bandwagon fallacy

"you cant find someone because you hate women"
causal fallacy

"you are just too ugly to have standards, your whole worldview is just ridiculous"
tu quoque fallacy and ad hominem

"theres no good reason to give up at this point"
sunk cost fallacy

"love shyness isnt real because Brian Gilmartin is fringe"
appeal to authority, red herring

Another bullseye. Thanks.
"It's natural selection"
Female sexual selection isn't what built civilization, the exact opposite is true. Without some level of enforced monogamy, we'd never haved stopped being hunter gatherers. All these "progressives" are simply disguised nature worshipers, with a few civilization destroying saboteurs leading them on.

This is Nazi elitist eugenics. If they're allowed to propagate this then they forfeit their socialist parties & preaching.
Newton IQ with naming their fallacies!!
Every incel should read this to understand how normies and chads are bullshitting incels with their lies.
Mods, please pin this thread!

Yeah this.
 
Last edited:
One of the highest IQ posts I've seen here. Good job, OP.
 
They don't care about putting forth an argument that actually makes logical sense. They believe they have already won by default when they begin an argument with us.
 
If we say something like, "Geez, it sure is hard getting dates," it's like we told everyone to go fuck themselves. And so we are attacked with these mean-spirited and dismissive rebuttals.
  • "You know people in Africa are starving!" (red herring),
  • "If you had really tried you would have been successful!" (affirming the consequent),
  • "Well everyone else is getting dates so it's just your own fault!" (sweeping generalization),
  • "If you keep trying eventually you'll get a girlfriend." (gambler's fallacy),
  • "Have you asked out every girl in the world - if not, you're not really involuntarily celibate!" (moving the goalpost),
  • "Women aren't evil creatures!" (moralistic),
  • "I've seen people as ugly as you with girlfriends." (cherry picking),
  • "People have been having sex since the dawn of time, including your parents, so the fault isn't your ugliness." (survivorship bias),
  • "Your toxic masculinity is preventing you from getting laid." (proof surrogate),
  • "You're a bad person." (ad-hominem),
  • etc etc etc
If what we are saying is true - that some people are just un-fuckable and un-lovable - then that means that life isn't fair, and everything they have is undeserved and could be robbed from them at anytime. Most people at least pseudo know this already, but their core beliefs and ego make them attack us on instinct.

If they were so sure of their rightness instead of stamping out the mere possibility of what we say being true, they would instead be interested in how this strange occurrences of involuntary celibacy came to be.

Feel free to add more of the common come-backs we receive when we complain.

(Edit/Disclaimer) I'm no expert in logic, I just have a mild interest in it, mostly because no one else seems to use it. I may have not identified the most apt fallacy for each example, partly because most of these rebuttals commit multiple fallacies, and I just choose the one that seemed closest.
(edit#2) @Mahlo gave me a few corrections of the fallacies committed, and I have updated the list with his corrections. Thanks! This is probably the last time I can edit this top post, so this is the list for better or worse now.
"Just hit the gym bro, shower bro, shave bro, get a haircut bro"
-(crude assumption of someone's heath/hygien)
-(covert ad-hominem) [they're saying: "lazy piece of shit"]
-(Hypocrisy)

Given that the asshats who say this tell us that looks don't matter, it's a hypocrit bullshit of an "advice"(it reinforces looks theory), also a generalization because it assumes all of us are either gigantically fat (can't fucking walk for an hour)as fuck or starvingsomalianchild-tier.
The Holy grail of retarded bluepilled advice.
One of the highest IQ posts I've seen here. Good job, OP.
Agreed.
The most high iq post i've read in months tbh, nice work OP.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
20
Views
238
BlueCore
BlueCore
RAJ GHRANDHICK
Replies
8
Views
191
weaselbomber
weaselbomber
Logic55
Replies
27
Views
276
Doesitmatter?
D
Kina Hikikomori
Replies
9
Views
668
Enigmaz
Enigmaz
userrrr
Replies
9
Views
148
Leonardo Part V
Leonardo Part V

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top