Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The "Collective Functionality" Of A System Is Often Due To "Compartmentalized Ineffectiveness"

BlkPillPres

BlkPillPres

Self-banned
-
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Posts
19,737
I have this fan I use because its hot in my house, it worked pretty well, recently I decided that I wanted it to "cool" more so I took the frame off of it (so now its just the blade without the front and back panel encasing). I went to sleep with the fan on its pivot cycle as I usually do, with it at its usual distance from my bed, when I woke up I had the sniffles, my eyes and tongue felt somewhat dried out, felt like I was getting a serious cold, etc.

It made me think about something, in some weird way I saw a connection between that and the relationship dynamics between men and women today, and the effect feminism had on it. Our relationship is a "partnership", that is the "function" of the relationship, but a partnership does not mean equal leverage or power. Feminism is like when I removed the fan encasing, I was trying to increase the effectiveness of one aspect of the fan but it ended up having a collective functional deficit because I did not make changes to suit those modifications, I should have moved the fan further away.

Women, society in general is trying to increase the effectiveness of certain aspects of male and female relationship dynamics, but what they don't get is that can have (and has had) a collective deficit on the functionality of that relationship, hence why men are dropping out of society and going on violent rampages. Society has made certain changes but it hasn't modified its ruleset to be properly adapted to those changes, hence all of the chaos taking place.

You see the fan was working pretty well, it was functional and achieved its tasks, I wanted to make it better in a specific aspect, but I did not even consider the aspects of the fans functionality that require "ineffectiveness" to make it "work". The encasing of the fan also functions as a buffer for the air being pushed, it makes it have a wider and calmer dispersal rate, and without that you bare the brunt of the full force of the air being cooled and pushed against you.

Same with the relationship dynamics between men and women, one could argue that women being the submissive in heterosexual relationships is an "ineffective flaw" of heterosexual relationships, but people fail to realize that some "flaws" are necessary, they misunderstand the function of that system because they aren't properly analyzing all of its aspects and the benefits of them, same as I did not even consider that the frame of the fan lowering the effectiveness of the fans "power" was in someways to my benefit. Women being tasked with submissiveness in relationships is an example "compartmentalized ineffectiveness" that benefits the "collective functionality" of a system.
 
Last edited:
Too high IQ for me.
 
High IQ thread OP. Do you have any ideas on what changes society could make in order to adapt to this current situation
 
High IQ thread OP. Do you have any ideas on what changes society could make in order to adapt to this current situation

Changes I plan to push for at some point in the future, first i'll have to build wealth and establish some kind of influence so I can pull strings behind the scenes to make it happen. We need to grant men privileges to offset the increase in female privileges.

E.g. Legalized prostitution, male contraceptive, changes to child support laws (more importantly enforced dna testing of all children paid for by tax dollars just like women get birth control paid for), then there are the extremes that are centuries from now like perfected artificial womb technology and realistic sex androids.
 
Changes I plan to push for at some point in the future, first i'll have to build wealth and establish some kind of influence so I can pull strings behind the scenes to make it happen. We need to grant men privileges to offset the increase in female privileges.

E.g. Legalized prostitution, male contraceptive, changes to child support laws (more importantly enforced dna testing of all children paid for by tax dollars just like women get birth control paid for), then there are the extremes that are centuries from now like perfected artificial womb technology and realistic sex androids.
Those sound very effective, though it won’t solve inceldom, it will at the very least greatly reduce the amount of injustices imposed on men at the hands of 3rd wave feminism
 
Those sound very effective, though it won’t solve inceldom, it will at the very least greatly reduce the amount of injustices imposed on men at the hands of 3rd wave feminism

Depends on what you see "inceldom" as

I see it as a lack of access to sex, as per the literal definition, involuntarily celibate.

If you see it as a lack of access to "safe" relationships with women and/or the ability to have children and get married without the risk of divorce or being cheated on due to hypergamy, then you won't see it as solving inceldom. I notice a lot of incels tend to stretch the definition of inceldom into this, and I keep repeating - "You are InLon (Involuntarily Loney) not InCel (Involuntarily Celibate)"

If prostitution became globally decriminalized, then it would effectively solve inceldom for the majority of men, but you will never get rid of inceldom completely, because it existed even in the times of patriarchy. If a man is born with an extreme physical disability, then he isn't even physically capable of having sex (e.g. defects on limbs, especially legs, or in a wheel chair), there will always be incels.

My goal isn't to get every man born laid, my goal is to grant every man who is physically capable to get themselves laid the opportunity to do so.

Inceldom will never end just like murder, theft, rape, etc will never end.
 
I have this fan I use because its hot in my house, it worked pretty well, recently I decided that I wanted it to "cool" more so I took the frame off of it (so now its just the blade without the front and back panel encasing). I went to sleep with the fan on its pivot cycle as I usually do, with it at its usual distance from my bed, when I woke up I had the sniffles, my eyes and tongue felt somewhat dried out, felt like I was getting a serious cold, etc.

It made me think about something, in some weird way I saw a connection between that and the relationship dynamics between men and women today, and the effect feminism had on it. Our relationship is a "partnership", that is the "function" of the relationship, but a partnership does not mean equal leverage or power. Feminism is like when I removed the fan encasing, I was trying to increase the effectiveness of one aspect of the fan but it ended up having a collective functional deficit because I did not make changes to suit those modifications, I should have moved the fan further away.

Women, society in general is trying to increase the effectiveness of certain aspects of male and female relationship dynamics, but what they don't get is that can have (and has had) a collective deficit on the functionality of that relationship, hence why men are dropping out of society and going on violent rampages. Society has made certain changes but it hasn't modified its ruleset to be properly adapted to those changes, hence all of the chaos taking place.

You see the fan was working pretty well, it was functional and achieved its tasks, I wanted to make it better in a specific aspect, but I did not even consider the aspects of the fans functionality that require "ineffectiveness" to make it "work". The encasing of the fan also functions as a buffer for the air being pushed, it makes it have a wider and calmer dispersal rate, and without that you bare the brunt of the full force of the air being cooled and pushed against you.

Same with the relationship dynamics between men and women, one could argue that women being the submissive in heterosexual relationships is an "ineffective flaw" of heterosexual relationships, but people fail to realize that some "flaws" are necessary, they misunderstand the function of that system because they aren't properly analyzing all of its aspects and the benefits of them, same as I did not even consider that the frame of the fan lowering the effectiveness of the fans "power" was in someways to my benefit. Women being tasked with submissiveness in relationships is an example "compartmentalized ineffectiveness" that benefits the "collective functionality" of a system.
These type of post is what the Normie's fear
They r scared of think deep AMD r loving in delusion
I have this fan I use because its hot in my house, it worked pretty well, recently I decided that I wanted it to "cool" more so I took the frame off of it (so now its just the blade without the front and back panel encasing). I went to sleep with the fan on its pivot cycle as I usually do, with it at its usual distance from my bed, when I woke up I had the sniffles, my eyes and tongue felt somewhat dried out, felt like I was getting a serious cold, etc.

It made me think about something, in some weird way I saw a connection between that and the relationship dynamics between men and women today, and the effect feminism had on it. Our relationship is a "partnership", that is the "function" of the relationship, but a partnership does not mean equal leverage or power. Feminism is like when I removed the fan encasing, I was trying to increase the effectiveness of one aspect of the fan but it ended up having a collective functional deficit because I did not make changes to suit those modifications, I should have moved the fan further away.

Women, society in general is trying to increase the effectiveness of certain aspects of male and female relationship dynamics, but what they don't get is that can have (and has had) a collective deficit on the functionality of that relationship, hence why men are dropping out of society and going on violent rampages. Society has made certain changes but it hasn't modified its ruleset to be properly adapted to those changes, hence all of the chaos taking place.

You see the fan was working pretty well, it was functional and achieved its tasks, I wanted to make it better in a specific aspect, but I did not even consider the aspects of the fans functionality that require "ineffectiveness" to make it "work". The encasing of the fan also functions as a buffer for the air being pushed, it makes it have a wider and calmer dispersal rate, and without that you bare the brunt of the full force of the air being cooled and pushed against you.

Same with the relationship dynamics between men and women, one could argue that women being the submissive in heterosexual relationships is an "ineffective flaw" of heterosexual relationships, but people fail to realize that some "flaws" are necessary, they misunderstand the function of that system because they aren't properly analyzing all of its aspects and the benefits of them, same as I did not even consider that the frame of the fan lowering the effectiveness of the fans "power" was in someways to my benefit. Women being tasked with submissiveness in relationships is an example "compartmentalized ineffectiveness" that benefits the "collective functionality" of a system.
For thousand of years women were the submissive partner in a relationship and it worked out fine with femanism and equality the balance has been disturbed
 
Last edited:
hypergamy is like putting a turbo on a honda civic engine and blowing it to hell under high load
 
Depends on what you see "inceldom" as

I see it as a lack of access to sex, as per the literal definition, involuntarily celibate.

If you see it as a lack of access to "safe" relationships with women and/or the ability to have children and get married without the risk of divorce or being cheated on due to hypergamy, then you won't see it as solving inceldom. I notice a lot of incels tend to stretch the definition of inceldom into this, and I keep repeating - "You are InLon (Involuntarily Loney) not InCel (Involuntarily Celibate)"

If prostitution became globally decriminalized, then it would effectively solve inceldom for the majority of men, but you will never get rid of inceldom completely, because it existed even in the times of patriarchy. If a man is born with an extreme physical disability, then he isn't even physically capable of having sex (e.g. defects on limbs, especially legs, or in a wheel chair), there will always be incels.

My goal isn't to get every man born laid, my goal is to grant every man who is physically capable to get themselves laid the opportunity to do so.

Inceldom will never end just like murder, theft, rape, etc will never end.
Generally, ascending is viewed as either having sex (without the use of an escort) or getting a girlfriend. Personally I don’t view marriage or an LTR as part of the package and I wouldn’t want to get involved in any of that. Inceldom has been around since the dawn of sexual reproduction and as you said, it’s an issue that will never come to an end
 
True.

America's fall is going to be epic. They will be talking about it for thousands of years.
 
Women, society in general is trying to increase the effectiveness of certain aspects of male and female relationship dynamics, but what they don't get is that can have (and has had) a collective deficit on the functionality of that relationship, hence why men are dropping out of society and going on violent rampages. Society has made certain changes but it hasn't modified its ruleset to be properly adapted to those changes, hence all of the chaos taking place.

I think this is what you've discovered.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollonian_and_Dionysian
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.1842v2.pdf
 
Women being tasked with submissiveness in relationships is an example "compartmentalized ineffectiveness" that benefits the "collective functionality" of a system.
Women need to be submissive so men can be masculine. And no, women submitting to chad doesnt count.
 
@SergeantIncel Must-Read Content
 

Similar threads

Nordicel94
Replies
21
Views
761
coreacheeka
C
Nordicel94
Replies
28
Views
856
FishmanBecker
FishmanBecker
Third Eye
Replies
27
Views
799
sexualeconomist
sexualeconomist
chudjak
Replies
35
Views
700
Vakasneb3856
Vakasneb3856

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top