Discussion The case for eugenics is obvious

[Homegrownman326]

I can't understand how people hate eugenics so much. In a society where eugenics exists, suffering will be mitigated to a very high extent. Lifespans could be made longer, genetic diseases eliminated, incels (who normies loathe so much) can also be eliminated as everyone can be chad, mental illnesses can be eliminated, we can make sure everyone is high IQ, tall, healthy, good looking, the dickpill could be solved, the list goes on. How can people be against such a world? We would still have to screen fetuses for negative mutations to prevent them, but that's doable. Everyone agrees that people should be judged for what they do, not what they look like. We know the opposite is the case today, to the dismay of many. Imagine a world where it does come down to merit and action, rather than the variables that are out of your control.

 

[Clavicus Vile]

Been asking them this for years and they still can’t give me a logical answer.

 

[Homegrownman326]

"Standards will increase if everyone looks like Chad". This is a valid argument, and that is indeed a problem. I think if the general populous exists in a certain looks threshold, it wouldn't really matter all that much. If one guy is two inches taller, I don't think we'll get the level of hypergamy that exists today.

 

[Cryotron]

you would have to sterilize majority of people for that, women especially since ugly women can easily reproduce unlike ugly men.

 

[Homegrownman326]

you would have to sterilize majority of people for that, women especially since ugly women can easily reproduce unlike ugly men.

So? The end most certainly justifies the means. I cannot morally justify allowing ugly people to be born

 

[LonerLothario]

as rehab said, if everyone is a chad then no one is

 

[InvoluntaryChigga]

"Standards will increase if everyone looks like Chad". This is a valid argument, and that is indeed a problem. I think if the general populous exists in a certain looks threshold, it wouldn't really matter all that much. If one guy is two inches taller, I don't think we'll get the level of hypergamy that exists today.

With eugenics you get northern Europe, and without it you get the entire continent of South Asia. Case in point.

 

[DeathSigil]

as rehab said, if everyone is a chad then no one is

 

[LastGerman]

I can't understand how people hate eugenics so much. In a society where eugenics exists, suffering will be mitigated to a very high extent. Lifespans could be made longer, genetic diseases eliminated, incels (who normies loathe so much) can also be eliminated as everyone can be chad, mental illnesses can be eliminated, we can make sure everyone is high IQ, tall, healthy, good looking, the dickpill could be solved, the list goes on. How can people be against such a world? We would still have to screen fetuses for negative mutations to prevent them, but that's doable. Everyone agrees that people should be judged for what they do, not what they look like. We know the opposite is the case today, to the dismay of many. Imagine a world where it does come down to merit and action, rather than the variables that are out of your control.

Indeed.

the dickpill could be solved

@Darth Aquarius @Yabadadabadoo @Spooky_Heejin

 

[Homegrownman326]

as rehab said, if everyone is a chad then no one is

I addressed that, and it's a more nuanced question. Women's attraction is based on a man being of higher value than her. If all mate options are of ideal genetic quality, so that there's no extreme outlier that would make everyone chad from a genetic standpoint. In this hypothetical world, would women adapt to it and seek even better genes? But since everyone would be within a certain threshold, there would be no outliers, so that isn't possible. I think Chad would become more about meritocracy, social proof, status, etc, in this new world, so Chad would exist still, but it would be based on factors inside a man's control. In this hypothetical world, bad gene mutations would be filtered out or prevented prior to birth, so no birth defects and no unforeseen mutations. There would also be no environmental pressure, ideally, that would cause competition and adaptation.

 

[To koniec]

you would have to sterilize majority of people for that, women especially since ugly women can easily reproduce unlike ugly men.

 

[To koniec]

With eugenics you get northern Europe, and without it you get the entire continent of South Asia. Case in point.

More like slaves to their own geography, Nordids are just caucasoids aclimated to harsh conditions while Indids are just Medditareans adapted to being in tropical climate

 

[Beck]

i love it

yet a part of me feels foids are still going to find a way to marginalize men and even in an all chad world we will have some form of incels

but i would take the chance as with the reproduction of all chad men we could see an improvement to the foid mind if we breed the right ones

 

[spongysleight]

I addressed that, and it's a more nuanced question. Women's attraction is based on a man being of higher value than her. If all mate options are of ideal genetic quality, so that there's no extreme outlier that would make everyone chad from a genetic standpoint. In this hypothetical world, would women adapt to it and seek even better genes? But since everyone would be within a certain threshold, there would be no outliers, so that isn't possible. I think Chad would become more about meritocracy, social proof, status, etc, in this new world, so Chad would exist still, but it would be based on factors inside a man's control. In this hypothetical world, bad gene mutations would be filtered out or prevented prior to birth, so no birth defects and no unforeseen mutations. There would also be no environmental pressure, ideally, that would cause competition and adaptation.

Wrong, according to our current standards there will be no outliers. But once everyone is brought closer to the norm, another new standard will be more heavily selected for to create discrepancies again, the goalpost will be moved and the hierarchy will re-establish. Women will naturally seek the best males and will find ways to tell them apart

 

[LonelyATM]

America should have let Austrian mustache man destroy Russia.

 

[Jimb0]

same reason why there being so many orphans and homeless children, rich people have kids instead of adopting, we're a sad, selfish lot

 

[InvoluntaryChigga]

More like slaves to their own geography, Nordids are just caucasoids aclimated to harsh conditions while Indids are just Medditareans adapted to being in tropical climate

I doubt that they still have any significant caucasoid admixture left

 

[To koniec]

I doubt that they still have any significant caucasoid admixture left

North Indid/Gracile Indid are caucaoids phenos

 

[InvoluntaryChigga]

North Indid/Gracile Indid are caucaoids phenos

Yea ik, i played raceguesser for a bit. Im just saying that by now, they probably have significant dravidian admixture

 

[Izayacel]

you would have to sterilize majority of people for that, women especially since ugly women can easily reproduce unlike ugly men.

 

[autistic.goblin]

Eugenics could save the whole world from its current state, not even joking

 

[LonerLothario]

I addressed that, and it's a more nuanced question. Women's attraction is based on a man being of higher value than her. If all mate options are of ideal genetic quality, so that there's no extreme outlier that would make everyone chad from a genetic standpoint. In this hypothetical world, would women adapt to it and seek even better genes? But since everyone would be within a certain threshold, there would be no outliers, so that isn't possible. I think Chad would become more about meritocracy, social proof, status, etc, in this new world, so Chad would exist still, but it would be based on factors inside a man's control. In this hypothetical world, bad gene mutations would be filtered out or prevented prior to birth, so no birth defects and no unforeseen mutations. There would also be no environmental pressure, ideally, that would cause competition and adaptation.

in a world like that, it would be all about personality unironically

 

[Retraux]

Eugenics is scientifically, morally, and spiritually sound. It's only opposed because it violates some of the fundamental tenets of the cult of liberalism that rules the west.

 

[I want to believe]

All men should reproduce, but only beautiful and tall foids should be allowed to have kids. Also foids should have no rights.

 

[depression]

There always needs to be a person(s) who gets put down

 

[Scrangillious Q.]

I think the real solution is changing our whole perspective of this world and loving and respecting people no matter their appearance.

This first option is impossible and will never happen.

The second solution is a big rock falling on Earth and obliterating everything, which is more possible than the first option.