Sartre once said we are condemned to be free. For him, as we live in a meaningless world, we must make our own life choices. And if we choose not to act, that is a choice too. We are condemned; we can't escape our freedom.
This is certainly overwhelming, and rather than accept this responsibility, people choose to lie to themselves and believe they are not in control. We seek a fixed and permanent identity.
And so the bluepill walks into the room, telling you a very specific set of traits you **must** possess if you are normal or a foid, straight or LGBT, white or black, etc. The bluepill dogma is popular and prominent because of this. The weak-willed, like the foids and some humans, **need** an identity to cling to as if it were a religion to guide their choices.
The Redpill? It is, itself, part of this. It doesn't suggest choice, and it's even more explicit than the bluepill is in this regard. Both the redpill and bluepill use insults and soft force to try to push us, the blackpillers, into fitting their "incel freak" stereotype. But while stereotypes exist for a reason, they aren't true. And when your very existence disproves them, it becomes even worse—it transforms into a struggle against not just a mere freak of society but something almost satanic in nature.
Now, it's a fight against a free person—a person so rejected by society that he stopped caring about being accepted. A person who says what he wants and likes what he likes. In this regard, one must imagine a happy society of blackpillers.
Regarding sex, status, and social acceptance, the bluepiller believes he is free and has a choice. The redpiller believes he has no choice but the right one. But the blackpiller? The blackpiller accepts he has no choice and decides to do whatever he wants.
The blackpiller doesn't feel like going outside? He won’t. Doesn't feel like talking to people? He doesn't.
The blackpiller knows he won't be accepted, so he doesn't need to make an effort, thus feeling freer.
This is certainly overwhelming, and rather than accept this responsibility, people choose to lie to themselves and believe they are not in control. We seek a fixed and permanent identity.
And so the bluepill walks into the room, telling you a very specific set of traits you **must** possess if you are normal or a foid, straight or LGBT, white or black, etc. The bluepill dogma is popular and prominent because of this. The weak-willed, like the foids and some humans, **need** an identity to cling to as if it were a religion to guide their choices.
The Redpill? It is, itself, part of this. It doesn't suggest choice, and it's even more explicit than the bluepill is in this regard. Both the redpill and bluepill use insults and soft force to try to push us, the blackpillers, into fitting their "incel freak" stereotype. But while stereotypes exist for a reason, they aren't true. And when your very existence disproves them, it becomes even worse—it transforms into a struggle against not just a mere freak of society but something almost satanic in nature.
Now, it's a fight against a free person—a person so rejected by society that he stopped caring about being accepted. A person who says what he wants and likes what he likes. In this regard, one must imagine a happy society of blackpillers.
Regarding sex, status, and social acceptance, the bluepiller believes he is free and has a choice. The redpiller believes he has no choice but the right one. But the blackpiller? The blackpiller accepts he has no choice and decides to do whatever he wants.
The blackpiller doesn't feel like going outside? He won’t. Doesn't feel like talking to people? He doesn't.
The blackpiller knows he won't be accepted, so he doesn't need to make an effort, thus feeling freer.
