Serious The bluepill is built on lies

[Stupid Clown]

The bluepill in all its woman worshiping cringe is built upon the presence of lies. Without lies it cannot exist. Reality is the opposite of everything it spews

For example
• body count does matter. Women with higher body counts are more likely to divorce.

Counterintuitive Trends in the Link Between Premarital Sex and Marital Stability

American sexual behavior is much different than it used to be. Today, most Americans think premarital sex is okay, and will have three or more sexual partners before marrying. What, if anything, does premarital sex have to do with marital stability? This research brief shows that the...

ifstudies.org

Yet bluepillers tell you that "BODY COUNT DOESN'T MATTER BRO"
• women in HR are less likely to ugly men and more likely to hire attractive men. Similarly they're less likely to hire attractive women

Attractive Women May Be Less Likely to Get Hired

The better-looking you are, the more likely you are to get hired. Unless, you are a woman.

www.livescience.com

• women take out rage on ugly men after being rejected by attractive men

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

•women put no effort into their looks when they're with men they find unattractive. Their happiness derives from gifts they get instead of sex

Here's an ugly truth about attractiveness

The attractiveness of a romantic partner can influence a person's desire to diet and seek a slim body, though that motivation contrasts sharply between men and women, new research has found.

web.archive.org

The bluepill only survives via censorship and dogma.

 

[Grodd]

The truth is Kryptonite to Bluepilled faggots

 

[Stupid Clown]

The truth is Kryptonite to Bluepilled faggots

"PSEUDO SCIENCE!""""

 

[Grodd]

"PSEUDO SCIENCE!""""

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

The bluepill is an extremely delusional and out of touch worldview.

 

[PureImagination]

Water is built on hydrogen and oxygen

 

[Neucher The Kanga]

blue pill is built on the just world fallacy

 

[Stupid Clown]

The bluepill is an extremely delusional and out of touch worldview.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Water is built on hydrogen and oxygen

LOL clever

 

[Stupid Clown]

blue pill is built on the just world fallacy

Yep.

 

[Lazyandtalentless]

The only time I’ve seen a "bluepiller" reference a study was when they linked one news article (not a scientific paper) based on self-reported views. It read: “90% of women say personality matters more than looks” —absolutely laughable. As if bluepillers don’t lie or virtue signal constantly. They only say things like that to appear like good people instead of shallow. Even if it were true, it doesn’t mean looks don’t matter at all. People still want to date someone who isn’t utterly hideous. The problem with relying on self-reported data like this is that it’s often biased and doesn’t reflect actual behavior. People want to seem morally superior, so they give answers they think are socially acceptable rather than honest. What someone claims to value in a study doesn’t always align with who they choose to date in real life. There’s actually a term this; it’s called social desirability bias, where people provide answers they believe are more socially acceptable rather than their true feelings. There is actually a study about how we make impressions from people’s faces. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articl...ation, impressions,are elicited by faces that

Key Findings:

1. First Impressions are Rapid and Automatic:
   • We form initial judgments of people based on their faces very quickly, often within milliseconds.
   • These judgments are largely automatic and unconscious.
2. Consensus in First Impressions:
   • There's a surprising degree of agreement across people (even across cultures) on basic traits inferred from faces, such as warmth and dominance.
3. "Overgeneralization" as a Core Mechanism:
   • The article proposes that many first impressions are based on "overgeneralization."
     • For example, we may perceive someone with baby-like features as naive and harmless, even if they are an adult. This is an overgeneralization of our natural tendency to care for and protect babies.
   • Other types of overgeneralization include:
     • Unfit Face Overgeneralization: We may perceive people with less attractive features as less healthy, competent, and trustworthy.
     • Emotion Face Overgeneralization: We may infer traits based on subtle cues in a person's face that resemble emotional expressions (e.g., a neutral face that slightly resembles anger might be perceived as more dominant).
4. Impact of Overgeneralization:
   • These overgeneralizations can lead to:
     • Real-world Consequences: First impressions from faces can influence important outcomes like hiring decisions, judicial proceedings, and even election results.

5. Why We Form These Impressions:

• Evolutionary roots: The article proposes that these rapid judgments evolved as a survival mechanism.
• Unfit face overgeneralization: We may subconsciously associate certain facial features with perceived "unfitness" (e.g., those with genetic anomalies). This can lead to negative judgments of people with unattractive features, even if they are perfectly healthy. Attractiveness: Symmetrical, average-looking faces are generally perceived as more attractive and are associated with positive traits (health, competence).

 

[Lazyandtalentless]

T

The only time I’ve seen a "bluepiller" reference a study was when they linked one news article (not a scientific paper) based on self-reported views. It read: “90% of women say personality matters more than looks” —absolutely laughable. As if bluepillers don’t lie or virtue signal constantly. They only say things like that to appear like good people instead of shallow. Even if it were true, it doesn’t mean looks don’t matter at all. People still want to date someone who isn’t utterly hideous. The problem with relying on self-reported data like this is that it’s often biased and doesn’t reflect actual behavior. People want to seem morally superior, so they give answers they think are socially acceptable rather than honest. What someone claims to value in a study doesn’t always align with who they choose to date in real life. There’s actually a term this; it’s called social desirability bias, where people provide answers they believe are more socially acceptable rather than their true feelings. There is actually a study about how we make impressions from people’s faces. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5473630/#:~:text=Consistent with babyface overgeneralization, impressions,are elicited by faces that

Key Findings:

1. First Impressions are Rapid and Automatic:
   • We form initial judgments of people based on their faces very quickly, often within milliseconds.
   • These judgments are largely automatic and unconscious.
2. Consensus in First Impressions:
   • There's a surprising degree of agreement across people (even across cultures) on basic traits inferred from faces, such as warmth and dominance.
3. "Overgeneralization" as a Core Mechanism:
   • The article proposes that many first impressions are based on "overgeneralization."
     • For example, we may perceive someone with baby-like features as naive and harmless, even if they are an adult. This is an overgeneralization of our natural tendency to care for and protect babies.
   • Other types of overgeneralization include:
     • Unfit Face Overgeneralization: We may perceive people with less attractive features as less healthy, competent, and trustworthy.
     • Emotion Face Overgeneralization: We may infer traits based on subtle cues in a person's face that resemble emotional expressions (e.g., a neutral face that slightly resembles anger might be perceived as more dominant).
4. Impact of Overgeneralization:
   • These overgeneralizations can lead to:
     • Real-world Consequences: First impressions from faces can influence important outcomes like hiring decisions, judicial proceedings, and even election results.

5. Why We Form These Impressions:

• Evolutionary roots: The article proposes that these rapid judgments evolved as a survival mechanism.
• Unfit face overgeneralization: We may subconsciously associate certain facial features with perceived "unfitness" (e.g., those with genetic anomalies). This can lead to negative judgments of people with unattractive features, even if they are perfectly healthy. Attractiveness: Symmetrical, average-looking faces are generally perceived as more attractive and are associated with positive traits (health, competence).

The study also mentions the halo effect

 

[VPSCel]

Water is built on hydrogen and oxygen