It's infuriating how so many people insist on the idea that involuntary celibates could easily find romantic and sexual partners should they try a little more. The very necessity of trying indicates there is something off that needs to be compensated for.
Take a look at these unattractive fish:
Have you ever wondered why these fish are so unattractive? They live in deep parts of the ocean where sunlight is nonexistent. That means there was no sexual selection based on physical appearance down there.
Humans, on the other hand, select their partners based on physical appearance because we can visually judge their facial and bodily characteristics in order to decide whether they are genetically fit, although physical appearance is not always a good indicator of genetic fitness.
Less attractive men do get selected by older women, who often have offspring from other relationships, but it's majorly for parental reasons. Both looks and money are important to women: looks guarantee a genetically superior offspring, whereas money guarantees resources for the offspring.
Highly attractive men are considered to be genetically fit; average men are considered to be good fathers and providers. Highly unattractive men are considered to be disposable. Money can't make up for extremely ugly facial and bodily characteristics.
To minimize the importance of these facts for a rubbish advice such as working on our personality is laughable and counterintuitive. Mammals are sexually selected by their phenotypes. Humans are mammals. Wake up to reality, please.
Take a look at these unattractive fish:
Have you ever wondered why these fish are so unattractive? They live in deep parts of the ocean where sunlight is nonexistent. That means there was no sexual selection based on physical appearance down there.
Humans, on the other hand, select their partners based on physical appearance because we can visually judge their facial and bodily characteristics in order to decide whether they are genetically fit, although physical appearance is not always a good indicator of genetic fitness.
Less attractive men do get selected by older women, who often have offspring from other relationships, but it's majorly for parental reasons. Both looks and money are important to women: looks guarantee a genetically superior offspring, whereas money guarantees resources for the offspring.
Highly attractive men are considered to be genetically fit; average men are considered to be good fathers and providers. Highly unattractive men are considered to be disposable. Money can't make up for extremely ugly facial and bodily characteristics.
To minimize the importance of these facts for a rubbish advice such as working on our personality is laughable and counterintuitive. Mammals are sexually selected by their phenotypes. Humans are mammals. Wake up to reality, please.
