The following meme, has a blackpill answer to it: Chads who fuck whores are seen as "studs". Foids who fuck fuck Chads are seen as Whores.
This feminist meme can be debunked, here's how. No redpill arguments like "A key that opens many locks is a Master Key. But a lock that opens to many keys is a worthless lock", only pure blackpill point of view here.
The mate chooser (woman), produces a judgement of an attractive value as a response to a certain configuration of morphological signals. The result of this interaction, is a value, "attractive" or "not attractive", created after the acquisition of visual information and its cognitive processing.
Chads are merely bodies to women, they have no intrinsic value (moral qualities, charisma), their only value is placed on them by women, and normies (because normies are behind women when it comes to this kind of judgement/assignation of value). Chad's value is just a result of a cognitive process when his attraction is influencing the process.
Normies see in Chad an egregore projection of their ego (collective group mind), so they decide that he is what they would like to be, but not all of them would be like him in his place, yet he remains the ideal to which the normie tend.
The Incel, distanced from the normies' point of view, sees Chad as the only aesthetic envelope, emitter whose value is attributed to it by the sexual selector (the woman). Then the women, are the agents that determine the status of the Chad, and normies, next in line after women, idolize Chad (but only as a mental projection).
Normies are driven by voluntary servitude, since Chad is only a handsome face that has no "intrinsic value", he has only won the genetic lottery. His value is placed on him by others.
So, the meme is invalid, since it explains only what happens when a small minority of men are seen by the majority of normies, but not the real process behind how this value is assigned. Ultimately, there is no true value in a Chad.
The reason why this meme is invalid, is because only a small minority of the male population can be Chad. Probabilistic-statistics rules are are not deterministic rules, they are valid only to describe the social issue. But here, we incels are not Chads, so we can't be valued like he is. So we are out of the reach of this meme, we are not exceptions, we are a statistical minority who see Chad for what he is, we don't place human value on him, we only rate his body.
This feminist meme can be debunked, here's how. No redpill arguments like "A key that opens many locks is a Master Key. But a lock that opens to many keys is a worthless lock", only pure blackpill point of view here.
The mate chooser (woman), produces a judgement of an attractive value as a response to a certain configuration of morphological signals. The result of this interaction, is a value, "attractive" or "not attractive", created after the acquisition of visual information and its cognitive processing.
Chads are merely bodies to women, they have no intrinsic value (moral qualities, charisma), their only value is placed on them by women, and normies (because normies are behind women when it comes to this kind of judgement/assignation of value). Chad's value is just a result of a cognitive process when his attraction is influencing the process.
Normies see in Chad an egregore projection of their ego (collective group mind), so they decide that he is what they would like to be, but not all of them would be like him in his place, yet he remains the ideal to which the normie tend.
The Incel, distanced from the normies' point of view, sees Chad as the only aesthetic envelope, emitter whose value is attributed to it by the sexual selector (the woman). Then the women, are the agents that determine the status of the Chad, and normies, next in line after women, idolize Chad (but only as a mental projection).
Normies are driven by voluntary servitude, since Chad is only a handsome face that has no "intrinsic value", he has only won the genetic lottery. His value is placed on him by others.
So, the meme is invalid, since it explains only what happens when a small minority of men are seen by the majority of normies, but not the real process behind how this value is assigned. Ultimately, there is no true value in a Chad.
The reason why this meme is invalid, is because only a small minority of the male population can be Chad. Probabilistic-statistics rules are are not deterministic rules, they are valid only to describe the social issue. But here, we incels are not Chads, so we can't be valued like he is. So we are out of the reach of this meme, we are not exceptions, we are a statistical minority who see Chad for what he is, we don't place human value on him, we only rate his body.
