Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The biggest lie told about women

Fontaine

Fontaine

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Posts
5,417
Is that they don't enjoy being treated like trash during sex.

Once you have accepted every single one of them likes choking, spanking and hair pulling, you kinda lose your attraction to them. Fucking savages.
 
They enjoy being treated like trash in general. But only by Chad

With their beta bux, they're "just not a sexual person."
 
...is, unfortunately, an activity that still appeals to me.
Now you know why religion is against sex. It excites everything that is dark, primitive and violent inside men
 
Now you know why religion is against sex. It excites everything that is dark, primitive and violent inside men

Too true. Which is why I have some hope that the accelerated hypersexuality of the post-religious West will run it into the ground.
 
Eh, inb4 cuck, I don't think that hurting a foid during intercourse would actually get me off, even if it got her off. But if she really wanted to, I guess I could. I don't even like watching BDSM, creeps me out srs.
 
Eh, inb4 cuck, I don't think that hurting a foid during intercourse would actually get me off, even if it got her off. But if she really wanted to, I guess I could. I don't even like watching BDSM, creeps me out srs.
I used to be like this. Damn, porn changed me a lot.
 
They enjoy being treated like trash in general. But only by Chad
They enjoy being dominated by a stronger and unyielding personality.

I don't think that hurting a foid during intercourse would actually get me off
Me too. Rough unsensual sex sounds really unappealing- unfortunately sluts like it.
 
Me too. Rough unsensual sex sounds really unappealing- unfortunately sluts like it.
Not "sluts"

ALL WOMEN

(this was confirmed to me outside of porn, by three different male womanizers and three female friends, including a Christian)
 
Eh, inb4 cuck, I don't think that hurting a foid during intercourse would actually get me off, even if it got her off. But if she really wanted to, I guess I could. I don't even like watching BDSM, creeps me out srs.

BDSM porn strikes me as uniquely cucked. I could never watch it with some dumb faggot grunting abuse as it slapped a bitch around. It pulls the spectator far out of the experience and makes them, more than usual, deeply conscious of their removal. That's a cunt that you want and this gorilla gets to hit it as it cries. Why?

Just thinking about doing it, though, I have to admit that it seems like it would be a good time. I have half a lifetime of "issues" to work out, so if she wanted to be defiled and humiliated, I think I could oblige.
 
Just thinking about doing it, though, I have to admit that it seems like it would be a good time. I have half a lifetime of "issues" to work out, so if she wanted to be defiled and humiliated, I think I could oblige.
Would sure beat "therapy" I think.

But I don't know, something in all this makes me uneasy. I'm not very religious by any means, but God hated lustful sodomites so much in the Bible... Possibly more than murderers. Seems like gambling with your soul to fuck women outside of pure reproduction.
 
This makes me more attracted to them tbh.
Would sure beat "therapy" I think.

But I don't know, something in all this makes me uneasy. I'm not very religious by any means, but God hated lustful sodomites so much in the Bible... Possibly more than murderers. Seems like gambling with your soul to fuck women outside of pure reproduction.
Come on man, you’re better than this. God also hates graven images, no one seems to have ascribed moral implications to that in the modern age. There is nothing innately “immoral” about what two consenting autonomous beings get up to when they’re naked together.
 
Last edited:
There is nothing innately “immoral” about what two consenting autonomous beings get up to when they’re naked together.

1451902587397s.jpg


Please, please reconsider this. Shitliberalism and the premium placed on "freedom" and "consent" is inimical to incels and social stability generally. You should know better than anyone else that the "victimless" crime of consensual sex has black, venomous tendrils ramifying into other lives.
 
1451902587397s.jpg


Please, please reconsider this. Shitliberalism and the premium placed on "freedom" and "consent" is inimical to incels and social stability generally. You should know better than anyone else that the "victimless" crime of consensual sex has black, venomous tendrils ramifying into other lives.
 
Too true. Which is why I have some hope that the accelerated hypersexuality of the post-religious West will run it into the ground.
Somethings gotta give.
 
1451902587397s.jpg


Please, please reconsider this. Shitliberalism and the premium placed on "freedom" and "consent" is inimical to incels and social stability generally. You should know better than anyone else that the "victimless" crime of consensual sex has black, venomous tendrils ramifying into other lives.
Definitely, if only because it causes jealousy, depression and strife in men who are left out.

As to libertarianism, here is my personal ranking of political systems: high-IQ authoritarianism > libertarianism > low-IQ authoritarianism

In the current state of affairs, freedom sure beats dysfunctional statism, but it's not the best system by any means.
 
Definitely, if only because it causes jealousy, depression and strife in men who are left out.
I agree that this is bad, but not enough for the system to be labelled inherently immoral. You cannot morally justify a system that caters to the jealousy of an embittered minority over the freedoms of a complicit majority.
As to libertarianism, here is my personal ranking of political systems: high-IQ authoritarianism > libertarianism > low-IQ authoritarianism

In the current state of affairs, freedom sure beats dysfunctional statism, but it's not the best system by any means.
Can you please describe to me what a high-IQ authoritarian system looks like? From my view, if one lesson can be learned from history it is that humanity is incapable of wielding absolute power benevolently, whether it be a single person or an assembled bloc, our nature is simply too courruptable.

Unless your assertion is that we should be ruled by some incorruptible AI? In which case I can somewhat see where you’re coming from, though the thought of surrendering the reigns still requires a large leap of faith and it’s still a fair way off in the future anyway.
 
They like being domimated, it's female nature.
 
But the question is why in the world do they like it?
And also, has it ever been this way? Then how could we human not acknowledge it yet and this isn'tu being taught from, at least teenagehood so we could try to develop some skill into it and stop looking like subhumen to every living foid who'sur secretly wishing to be treated like an animal.
I sometimes end up believing (((they))) contributed to implement that kind of attrait for being dominated into women.
Afaic I hate dominating AND being dominated equally. Does that make me abnormal?
This is extremely infuriating and depressing me even more OP.
 
Is that they don't enjoy being treated like trash during sex.

Once you have accepted every single one of them likes choking, spanking and hair pulling, you kinda lose your attraction to them. Fucking savages.

That 'lie' is quickly becoming mainstream cool, anyways:



If it wasn't already in the 2000s when Sex and the City came out.
 

Similar threads

Skoga
Replies
50
Views
3K
FuckHOA
FuckHOA
KingOfInceldia
Replies
6
Views
176
KingOfInceldia
KingOfInceldia
SuperKanga.Belgrade
Replies
23
Views
474
yeetbender.koala
yeetbender.koala
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
30
Views
977
Regressive
Regressive

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top