Isn't that ironic?
Isn't that ironic?
J
Just pillage and rape theory
conquer lots of land to compensate for interior looks
Interesting lmao.
Biggest Chang in existence.
shouldnt it be alexander?
Alexander didn't rape thosusands of women
yeah but would mog this gook
nah the biggest chad is probably some retard on instagram that I don't know who he is
A Chad is someone who has tons of sex, not necessarily someone with good looks. Elliot Rodger didn't get laid either despite having the looks.
No, a Chad is someone with good looks. You wouldn't call a crooked, ogre-faced rapist a Chad.
just take the massrapepill theory
Genghis Khan wasn't a Chad. He was a war-mongering conquerer who took whatever he wanted. His stationary power was unprecedented, but having tonnes of sex due to status doesn't make you a Chad.
Genghis khan mogged cope his stats mog anyone in history
tbh rapists are more based than chads
i personally think the only index of chadness is number of sex regardless of its means...but yeah chad has its own definition (facial features/masculinity etc)
facially speaking he was sub5 tbh compared to alex
You don’t know what either 2 looked like JFL. Also it didnt matter that much during those days
I feel like debating which chad is the biggest chad in existence is something that's best left for PSL nerds on gay looksfag forums
i trust the pics on the net
alex is more in line with modern definition of chad than that fucking chinkie
That wasn't the purpose of this thread. I just pointed out that the man with the most sex was not some white guy, but an asian.
1 in 200 Men are Direct Descendants of Genghis Khan
Tracing Y chromosomes can answer centuries-old questions about Genghis Khan's descendants today.
www.discovermagazine.com
yeah but calling him the 'biggest chad' may have misled people into thinking this was about something else
Ricecel and rapecel in one package.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
