Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion The average .is user is pretty bad at rating

Supreme Kanga

Supreme Kanga

Paragon
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 9, 2024
Posts
16,185
Anytime I see someone on here talk about some "stacy" they saw I just know that she was probably a HTB at best and that's being generous. It's not just foids that people on here overrate though, people here are bad at rating guys as well. I see users on here call guys that wouldn't even be chads in the darkest sewers of mumbai chads.

If you aren't overrating you most likely have never seen a real chad irl. The best looking guys you'll see in social situations are HTNs and maybe the odd chadlite.

In my mind there is a difference between a guy who gets rated as a chad and a guy who gets "chad treatment". The best looking guys in any social environment are going to be the ones getting chad treatment and most of the time those guys are tall HTNs.
 

vagina-pussy-gif.1320320
 
.org shiet nigga
 
women with blue eyes blonde hair + non recessed maxilla and mandible=stacy to everybody. jfl at this shit being a foid is too fucking easy man. meanwhile as a man youve got to be perfect in everything fuck this shit. one falio and its game over
 
women with blue eyes blonde hair + non recessed maxilla and mandible=stacy to everybody. jfl at this shit being a foid is too fucking easy man. meanwhile as a man youve got to be perfect in everything fuck this shit. one falio and its game over
Makeup frauding blonde LTB has infinite SMV meanwhile her looksmatch is a permarotter
 
Agreed

Alongside @ElTruecel @Ci Jey and @wereq who I would highly recommend

Fuck wheat waffles & all those other scammerfags, these guys are the ones who should be giving out ratings. :feelsYall:
I remember being tempted to get a rating from wheat waffles but it's not worth it when you get more accurate ratings for free
 
Agreed

Alongside @ElTruecel @Ci Jey and @wereq who I would highly recommend

Fuck wheat waffles & all those other scammerfags, these guys are the ones who should be giving out ratings. :feelsYall:
:feelsYall:
 
Yeah I do agree- I think a lot of it is just being hyperbolic though

As you pointed out, a HTN will get Chad treatment provided Chad is not around- even some tallfag normie would provide no one mogs him facially.

But yeah, some here do not know how to rate and will label any white girl as a HTB whilst labeling any guy who slightly mogs as literally chad.

In my whole life, I think I've only known of one or two legitimate chads: The rest are HTNs or Chadlites who just have a certain halo due to status, wealth, height, being gymmaxxed, etc.
.org shiet nigga
,org shit overlaps a lot with the content on here
.org is even worse at rating in some cases I'd say

Some there are very scrtuionous to the point they severely underrate; I've seen legit HTNlites get destroyed in the rating system there

It's partly because some want to drag others down, but also because they have very strict standards
 
Makeup frauding blonde LTB has infinite SMV meanwhile her looksmatch is a permarotter
I'm not blonde, but light-brown so close enough. :feelsrope:
Np bhaicel
I remember being tempted to get a rating from wheat waffles but it's not worth it when you get more accurate ratings for free
I was, and I still kinda am a bit

But I already had some prior knowledge over this stuff, and have been rated enough times to where I'd say the results are reliable & valid
 
.org is even worse at rating in some cases I'd say

Some there are very scrtuionous to the point they severely underrate; I've seen legit HTNlites get destroyed in the rating system there

It's partly because some want to drag others down, but also because they have very strict standards
.org has the opposite problem to here. There's some good raters on there like there is on here but I find people on there tend to underrate. I've seen a lot of above average looking guys get rated as MTNs over there
 
.org has the opposite problem to here. There's some good raters on there like there is on here but I find people on there tend to underrate. I've seen a lot of above average looking guys get rated as MTNs over there
Yeah exactly my point

Here people will assume any white or black guy who is somewhat above average or tall is "chadlite" or "tyrone" and then over there, any slight flaw will be exploited to ramp-down someones looks rating to either try and drag them down or because the rater is extremely scrupulous
 
Over for blindcels
 
They underrate "bad looking" faces to push "I am a trucel" narrative but then overrate certain individual faces. All to push a certain agenda. Nothing too surprising.
 

Similar threads

M
Replies
6
Views
169
AutistSupremacist
AutistSupremacist
FrenchcelNeverbegan
Replies
9
Views
254
CopiumGuru
CopiumGuru
PunishedNEETcel
Replies
7
Views
284
Lymecel
Lymecel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top