The argument that sex should be "free"

[Jabba The Hutt]

So there is this argument against prostitution:

"Prostitution is cucked, we should not give women money, sex should be free"

Sex will never be "free" and it cannot be free. For the simple reason, that women are a limited and finite resource.

If you could get sex for "free" why would anyone work? Such a society would collapse immidiately, because no one would have an incentive to work anymore
(it's just a different form of communism. and we already know that communism doesn't work, for the same reason: if everyone gets free stuff, there is no reason to work)

Even in a patriarchic society, which treated women as property. you would require resources (money, social status) to acquire sex. So the difference to actual prostitution would be very small.

So as a broke incel, you would most likely be an incel even in a patriarchic society. (because high status men would have harems)

Enforced monogamy would be better for incels, as it prevents high status men from monopolizing women (at least in an overt manner, it would still happen behind closed doors)

But then you would get an ugly wife at best, being a low status man.

And in those stricly religious socities, you would also have many other social obligations. You could not just play computer games.

At least with legalized prostitution, you can get the experience of having sex with a Stacy, as an incel. This would be very unlikely if we still had enforced monogamy or Patriarchy.

The only way to get truly "free" sex would be via cheap sex robots or some kind of advanced virtual reality.

 

[Darius L]

Sex should be subsidized by state brothels, half the women must be put in those brothels to fuck, the other half should be breed in labs to produce better whores for the citizens of the imperium.

 

[Jabba The Hutt]

Sex should be subsidized by state brothels, half the women must be put in those brothels to fuck, the other half should be breed in labs to produce better whores for the citizens of the imperium.

While this would be theoretically possible, it ignores the reality of evolution.

Men evolved to compete for women, to maximize the reproduction of their DNA.

So this society would not last very long, because individual men would again try to get more than their fair share of pussy.

Your society requires ALL men to implicitely agree on the following: "women must be shared by everyone. and no one shall try to get more than his fair share"

This never works out in reality. It's also the reason why communism fails.

 

[Darius L]

While this would be theoretically possible, it ignores the reality of evolution.

Men evolved to compete for women, to maximize the reproduction of their DNA.

So this society would not last very long, because individual men would again try to get more than their fair share of pussy.

Your society requires ALL men to implicitely agree on the following: "women must be shared by everyone. and no one shall try to get more than his fair share"

This never works out in reality. It's also the reason why communism fails.

Will see.

 

[Sennacherib]

Joined Dec 18, 2022

KYS tranny faggot,toilets are worthless and should be slaves

 

[Jabba The Hutt]

KYS tranny faggot,toilets are worthless and should be slaves

low IQ. if women are slaves. then rich men will monopolize all the Stacies. you would still be incel.
and also, when slavery is accepted in a society. many men would be slaves as well. so you would most likely be a slave in such a society, given your low social status. you would have it much worse

 

[honorarycurry]

Sex should be paid but regulated by the state and condoms shouldnt be mandatory. Sex with condom = worse masturbation

 

[Snhook]

When you say that sex cannot be free, are you only referring to sex not being able to be free for incels?

 

[bigblackman39]

So there is this argument against prostitution:

"Prostitution is cucked, we should not give women money, sex should be free"

Sex will never be "free" and it cannot be free. For the simple reason, that women are a limited and finite resource.

If you could get sex for "free" why would anyone work? Such a society would collapse immidiately, because no one would have an incentive to work anymore
(it's just a different form of communism. and we already know that communism doesn't work, for the same reason: if everyone gets free stuff, there is no reason to work)

Even in a patriarchic society, which treated women as property. you would require resources (money, social status) to acquire sex. So the difference to actual prostitution would be very small.

So as a broke incel, you would most likely be an incel even in a patriarchic society. (because high status men would have harems)

Enforced monogamy would be better for incels, as it prevents high status men from monopolizing women (at least in an overt manner, it would still happen behind closed doors)

But then you would get an ugly wife at best, being a low status man.

And in those stricly religious socities, you would also have many other social obligations. You could not just play computer games.

At least with legalized prostitution, you can get the experience of having sex with a Stacy, as an incel. This would be very unlikely if we still had enforced monogamy or Patriarchy.

The only way to get truly "free" sex would be via cheap sex robots or some kind of advanced virtual reality.

Tldr

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

Chads are a finite resource for foids.

 

[MoreWeight94]

Only reason why prostitution "produces sex" is on the supply side. The whores are "serving" countless men every day assembly line style.

And most whores are not doing it voluntarily lot's are drug addicts "working men over" to inject the cast into their veins.

Some are just indebted to loansharks and then forced into prostitution to pay the debt which never goes down.

Some are ethnics imported to the country by their mafias just to produce them money (have you ever seen the demographics of whores in your district, most of them are immigrants).

I doubt any (sane) woman would prostitute themselves willingly given how easy mode being woman is.

 

[Ahnfeltia]

Your argument has some holes (or so it seems anyway)

If you could get sex for "free" why would anyone work? Such a society would collapse immidiately, because no one would have an incentive to work anymore

Because there's more to life than sex? Like, you can't fuck for hours on end day in, day out. People obviously have to procure food so as to not die prematurely -- that requires work

(it's just a different form of communism. and we already know that communism doesn't work, for the same reason: if everyone gets free stuff, there is no reason to work)

Communism is so much more than you make it out to be here