Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious The 80/20 rule is Now the 95/5 rule

FoidsDeserveCancer

FoidsDeserveCancer

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 14, 2018
Posts
804
All thanks to Tinder, feminism, hypergamy, and all around Libtards. The 80/20 rule is now the 95/5 rule.
 
Cope. 80/20 still applies.
 
more like 85/15 in my experience
 
>80/20 rule IRL
95/5 rule online
 
We don't know what it is exactly. We would need a sexual study done in 2018 to see how bad it is. Chances are though it's not lower than 20/80 but higher than 20/80 we just don't know how much.

>80/20 rule IRL
95/5 rule online

This could be true. Maybe somewhere an average of the two for the combined total.
 
Numbers are for autists and cabbalists. All that matters is that we are ugly and women will never be attracted to us. Caring about the specifics of women's preferences is a waste of time. Who cares what they want when they don't want us?
 
when you're at the low end of the top 20% girls think they're "settling" for you, that you're average looking and they're going for your "personality". when you get to the top 5% that's when they actually think you're attractive
 
More like 80/20 for white guys and 50/50 for ethnics.
 
According to genetic science we have 17 female ancestors for every male ancestor. So that’s 94/6 rule.

Close enough.
 
According to genetic science we have 17 female ancestors for every male ancestor. So that’s 94/6 rule.

Close enough.

Just think. For a long time most women spent their lives in harems
 
Numbers are for autists and cabbalists. All that matters is that we are ugly and women will never be attracted to us. Caring about the specifics of women's preferences is a waste of time. Who cares what they want when they don't want us?

Well if the numbers get bad enough and there are lots more men who can't get any woman then there might be a revolution due to collapse of society as more men opt out of participating or some smart people might realize that monogomous marriage worked best for society before and work towards reversing the hypergamy of recent years.

I doubt it will happen in our lifetimes though and it will probably get a lot worse with legal harems before it gets better. We were just born at the wrong time in history. Oh well.
 
Just think. For a long time most women spent their lives in harems

Which isn’t probably why they instinctively want to return to that state. They evolved for millions of years to be part of chads harem, marriage and monogamy just aren’t natural for femoids.

Human society, for millions of years, in the African Great Rift Valley, was essentially identical to Lion society. One big male with his pride of females while 80% of males wandered around lost, lonely, and starving. The goal of feminism is to return to this state, and they are currently winning.
 
According to genetic science we have 17 female ancestors for every male ancestor. So that’s 94/6 rule.
That was during a brief period of time around 8000 years ago. The average throughout the history of Homo Sapiens is closer to 80/40. Meaning that 80% of foids reproduced, while 40% of men did.
 
This is almost as stupid as you hiring a foid to pretend to be your gf, ngl.
 
Just think. For a long time most women spent their lives in harems

and you wonder why they are so well inclined to giving the stinkeye to subpar men, it's in their blood. and cucks are literally the harem guards reborn.
 
99/1 in 2020. Can't wait for ww3.
 
Before the year 2030 it's going to be 99/1
 
95/5 sounds accurate only if you exclude all the betabucks and interests-based relationships, but wasn't it always like that?
even just being the coolest in the group / the one that other girls want, is enough for you to get picked out of interest instead of "love", and you are statusbuxxing rather than having someone madly in love with you like the 5
 
95/5 sounds accurate only if you exclude all the betabucks and interests-based relationships, but wasn't it always like that?
even just being the coolest in the group / the one that other girls want, is enough for you to get picked out of interest instead of "love", and you are statusbuxxing

It was only like that in pre-civilization era when humans lived in caves and roamed around as nomads. Which was over 10,000 years ago.
 
Julycel attempting to drop knowledge without even knowing what the 80/20 rule actually is lol...
 
It's 100/0 rule now, over for Chadcels. Femoids fuck each other.
 
@Mickeyonacid @Weightcel
Thanks for the tag.
As for OP,
1533064233769
1533064311254

Forensic studies have proven that twice more women than men throughout the history of the world have reproduced, leading to an 80:40 rule being more accurate overall. However, this figure includes rape, government enforced monogamy, and “settling.” If we exclude such factors and leave the choice entirely to women, 80:20 would be right on the mark, if not something closer to 80:10. A 95/5 rule as OP proposes is ludicrous now, but in 2020-2030, even a 99/1 rule wouldn't surprise me.
 

Similar threads

Flagellum_Dei
Replies
76
Views
777
DioptricAtol
DioptricAtol
B
Replies
5
Views
216
Multicell
Multicell
S
Replies
18
Views
583
Izayacel
Izayacel
Limitcel
Replies
1
Views
333
GeneticDysfunction
GeneticDysfunction
Freixel
Replies
9
Views
440
PurgatoryPass
PurgatoryPass

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top