Just think about it.
People always say that adult men should not have sex with teen girls because there will be power imbalance between them.
Then why do these same people approve of sex between teen boys and teen girls? Are they assuming that there will be no power imbalance between a teenage boy and a teenage girl?
Hells,i think that the power imbalance between 17 year old chads and a 15 year old Stacy is greater than that of a teen stacy and an adult man that buys teenage bride.
Because the adult man is bound to laws and supervision from the parents,but the teenage boy is still a minor and is harder to convict.
This means that if a man abused or beat his teenage gf he can get into prison,but a minor can weasel his way around.
This means there is more risk of abuse of power in a teenage relationship,dont you think?
"But teenage boys have no power.How can they abuse their partners?"
Obviously teenage boys have more power than girls,in both the biological and social meaning of power.
Particularly sex-having teenage boys,because girls only choose higher status and more powerful male as their mating partner.
"Dood this has nothing to do with inceldom"
Of course it has everything to do with inceldom.
How many of us here are psychologically damaged from seeing chads railing all the girls in school or in university? (I never see people banging in hs because i live in conservative country,but pretty much every yurofags here have a story like that)
With this law we can pretty much fine teenage sex havers.
Also,the sexual liberalization in school results in sexual inequality,just like the liberal open market in US results in wealth inequality.
This law will close the market and prevent sexual equality among teenagers.
People always say that adult men should not have sex with teen girls because there will be power imbalance between them.
Then why do these same people approve of sex between teen boys and teen girls? Are they assuming that there will be no power imbalance between a teenage boy and a teenage girl?
Hells,i think that the power imbalance between 17 year old chads and a 15 year old Stacy is greater than that of a teen stacy and an adult man that buys teenage bride.
Because the adult man is bound to laws and supervision from the parents,but the teenage boy is still a minor and is harder to convict.
This means that if a man abused or beat his teenage gf he can get into prison,but a minor can weasel his way around.
This means there is more risk of abuse of power in a teenage relationship,dont you think?
"But teenage boys have no power.How can they abuse their partners?"
Obviously teenage boys have more power than girls,in both the biological and social meaning of power.
Particularly sex-having teenage boys,because girls only choose higher status and more powerful male as their mating partner.
"Dood this has nothing to do with inceldom"
Of course it has everything to do with inceldom.
How many of us here are psychologically damaged from seeing chads railing all the girls in school or in university? (I never see people banging in hs because i live in conservative country,but pretty much every yurofags here have a story like that)
With this law we can pretty much fine teenage sex havers.
Also,the sexual liberalization in school results in sexual inequality,just like the liberal open market in US results in wealth inequality.
This law will close the market and prevent sexual equality among teenagers.
I grow up in a relatively conservative country, only a rare few actually engaged in sexual activites, no one was banging each other every week. Single moms are usually looked at with disdain but unfortunately feminism is already creeping in here.
