Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Taste for underage foids shouldn't be allowed

Pepsicel

Pepsicel

Escortcel consultant in Incels.co
-
Joined
Dec 11, 2021
Posts
689
100% - Permaban Alt of itallfelldown
The most common arguments to defend taste toward underage foids:

1. Virgin foids(who are usually below 14 yo) are more loyal: fair point. There's data that proves this fact . That foids with least sexual partners are more loyal. Sadly, that data was gathered from foids that got married over 20 years ago. Nowadays they will dump you unless she doesn't have Internet and doesn't go to school. Is too bluepilled to think that these foids are programmable. Such thing requieres a systematic change.

2. Underage foids are tighter: No. Is genetical. Is the same thing as dick size. If you already dicked foids you should know that.

3. Underage foids are already fucking Chad: fair point nothing to discusss. But an adult man doing it is taboo and adding this taste to the incel strawman is bad for the last problem I will list below.

4. Taste for underage foids is common among men: Yes nothing to discuss. For that reason landwhales(mainly the young ones) used to feel ashamed of themselves. In fact: in escorting forums teen like escorts are the most desirable and expensive.

5. "Incel detractors will find other way to screw up the community". Cope. Those are often the ER threads, volcel threads and defending threads of this topic.

6. Is free speech: Yeah, but is contributing to the incel strawman. Also calling agecuck someone who doesn't support it gives the vibe that is a general concensus. Is practically outcasting of the community for someone that has nothing to do with inceldom discussion.

The problem is that:
1. Defending this position is not part of inceldom discussion. How it affects you if the underage foid will accuse you anyway? When is posted it gives the vibe that is a general concensus like the blackpills.

2. The second and most imoportant problem leads to create more enemies. Therefore the site is more prone to be attacked or be shut down. Personally: I love this site. i love this community. It would've been a nice experience to be in braincels. But it is already in the eye of the hurricane. If this site gives the vibe that pedofilia, [UWSL]hebephilia and ephebophilia are general concensus we will gain more enemies. It has been proven that FBI or feds don't have to do a shit. Is just matter of time that other guy will drown the site with requestests. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]as you can see there's more to lose than win if these threads (that have nothing to do with inceldom discussion) are allowed.[/UWSL]
 
Last edited:
:soy::
The most common arguments to defend taste toward underage foids:

1. Virgin foids(who are usually below 14 yo) are more loyal: fair point. There's data that proves this fact . That foids with least sexual partners are more loyal. Sadly, that data was gathered from foids that got married over 20 years ago. Nowadays they will dump you unless she doesn't have Internet and doesn't go to school. Is too bluepilled to think that these foids are programmable. Such thing requieres a systematic change.

2. Underage foids are tighter: No. Is genetical. Is the same thing as dick size. If you already dicked foids you should know that.

3. Underage foids are already fucking Chad: fair point nothing to discusss. But an adult man doing it is taboo and adding this taste to the incel strawman is bad for the last problem I will list below.

4. Taste for underage foids is common among men: Yes nothing to discuss. For that reason landwhales(mainly the young ones) used to feel ashamed of themselves. In fact: in escorting forums teen like escorts are the most desirable and expensive.

5. "Incel detractors will find other way to screw up the community". Cope. Those are often the ER threads, volcel threads and defending threads of this topic.

6. Is free speech: Yeah, but is contributing to the incel strawman. Also calling agecuck someone who doesn't support it gives the vibe that is a general concensus. Is practically outcasting of the community for someone that has nothing to do with inceldom discussion.

The problem is that:
1. Defending this position is not part of inceldom discussion. How it affects you if the underage foid will accuse you anyway? When is posted it gives the vibe that is a general concensus like the blackpills.

2. The second and most imoportant problem leads to create more enemies. Therefore the site is more prone to be attacked or be shut down. Personally: I love this site. i love this community. It would've been a nice experience to be in braincels. But it is already in the eye of the hurricane. If this site gives the vibe that pedofilia, hebephilia and ephebophilia are general concensus we will gain more enemies. It has been proven that FBI or feds don't have to do a shit. Is just matter of time that other guy will drown the site with requestests.

as you can see there's more to lose than win if these threads (that have nothing to do with inceldom discussion) are allowed.:bluepill:
 
What’s up with all these agecuck threads lately . @Fat Link
Have we been infiltrated by IT or glowniggers?
 
I didn’t read it all but I wanna agree on the terms of enemy making, as if anything will get the site shut down, it’s those polls that say “would you fuck a 12 year old” or some shit. All it’s gonna do is cause trouble. I just don’t want the site to get removed or fucked with, but we all know they still will try and get the site removed daily for anything, so I’m unsure how I feel
 
I didn’t read it all but I wanna agree on the terms of enemy making, as if anything will get the site shut down, it’s those polls that say “would you fuck a 12 year old” or some shit. All it’s gonna do is cause trouble. I just don’t want the site to get removed or fucked with, but we all know they still will try and get the site removed daily for anything, so I’m unsure how I feel
it doesnt matter, as long as this site is not feminist and discusses ugly men's issues it will always be a target
 
Imagine thinking optics means anything. Dumbass agecuck. Being a white knight for teen foids will not make us liked.
 
Imagine thinking optics means anything. Dumbass agecuck. Being a white knight for teen foids will not make us liked.
You didn't get my point. I just said that these discussions shouldn't be allowed because they create more enemies for the community.
 
I don't agree. This policy prescription sounds overbroad.
 
Seethe faggot
 
You didn't get my point. I just said that these discussions shouldn't be allowed because they create more enemies for the community.
Dude, that's what I meant. You care about optics. The incel community is already despised. Moralfagging and white knighting will not help, it will just water us down.
 
Dude, that's what I meant. You care about optics. The incel community is already despised. Moralfagging and white knighting will not help, it will just water us down.
I never stated that those things should be done. Is more about omission that in order to gain less enemies.
 
2. Underage foids are tighter: No. Is genetical. Is the same thing as dick size. If you already dicked foids you should know that.
Yeah a 10 year old will have the same pussy as a 20 year old or a 30 year old :feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:
 
I never stated that those things should be done. Is more about omission that in order to gain less enemies.
Some of us agree with the general thrust of your post, but think that your prescription is overly censorius
 
I never stated that those things should be done. Is more about omission that in order to gain less enemies.
You need to stop caring about "gaining enemies". We have enemies already, it's called the entire internet. So long as the mods ban infiltrators and the hosting service doesn't nuke the site, there is no reason to give a shit what people think. Censoring this forum would be a slippery slope.
 
Joined Dec 11, 2021 but at least he typed a lot of words so I'll indulge.

2. Underage foids are tighter: No. Is genetical. Is the same thing as dick size. If you already dicked foids you should know that.
Genetics and age are both variables which determine things like height and dick/pussy size.

The average adult man with a 5-inch dick is going to sizemog (height and dick) someone with gigachad genedicts destined to grow up and have a 9 inch cock, if he's a preteen who hasn't started puberty because his dick won't be anywhere near even half it's final size.

Same thing obviously applies to vagina parameters.

If what you mean to say is that being mid-pubescent is not a guarantee of tightness then I agree, that's because they might be inherently looser due to DNA and also looser due to already being sexually active.

This doesn't however contradict that vagina gets bigger as puberty progresses.

3. Underage foids are already fucking Chad: fair point nothing to discusss. But an adult man doing it is taboo and adding this taste to the incel strawman is bad
so you have no point to make except concern-trolling about appearances toward people who will hate us
it's taboo to be an ugly man, we're always gonna be taboo


In fact: in escorting forums teen like escorts are the most desirable and expensive.
this wasn't a smooth read, you should've written "in escorting forums, teen-like escorts..."

5. "Incel detractors will find other way to screw up the community". Cope. Those are often the ER threads, volcel threads and defending threads of this topic.
No idea what you're expressing here, please rephrase.

6. Is free speech: Yeah, but is contributing to the incel strawman.
There will always be the incel strawman.
You are focusing on the wrong cause here.

Also calling agecuck someone who doesn't support it gives the vibe that is a general concensus.
No it does not.
We always have differences of opinion on how to apply labels here.
People are free to condemn stuff as "gay" or "cucked" for example without that being seen as "a consensus".

IT will always isolate fringe views and persent them as consensus. Happens with calls for violence, extreme misogyny, calls to enslave women, etc.

You'll never stop it, and I don't want to sacrifice the opportunity to debate those I disagree with on these things by censoring them.

Is practically outcasting of the community for someone that has nothing to do with inceldom discussion.
we're inherently outcasted, can't stop that

1. Defending this position is not part of inceldom discussion. How it affects you if the underage foid will accuse you anyway?
You just proved yourself wrong: we can have discussions about how this issue affects us, ergo it's part of our discussion.

When is posted it gives the vibe that is a general concensus like the blackpills.
No it doesn't.
What gives the vibe of outlier looks being "consensus" is that IT will cherrypick and present them like that by lying.
They will always find shit like that. If one guy says he showers once a year then we ALL shower once a year.

I post stuff like "I would debate women here" but that doesn't mean "let women post" is consensus.
You're being illogical.

2. The second and most imoportant problem leads to create more enemies. Therefore the site is more prone to be attacked or be shut down.
They were already our enemies, you're coping if you're in denial of that.

If this site gives the vibe that pedofilia, [UWSL]hebephilia and ephebophilia are general concensus we will gain more enemies.[/UWSL]
IT will always paint this vibe indefinitely even if we shut down discussion of girls under 20 tomorrow. There's no fixing it. IT will always misrepresent consensus.

You should go and disrupt them, not disrupt us.

Also: ephebophilia is homosexual sex with adolescent boys, it is already banned here.

I am a critic of pedophilia and I don't want people who promote pedophilia to be banned, I want to debate with them.

IT will always misrepresent but IMO the best evidence they're full of shit is open discussion where we allow disagreement on these issues.

If you mandate opposition to pedophilia this just makes it seem like people pretend-oppose it to obey the rules instead of legit oppose it.


[UWSL] It has been proven that FBI or feds don't have to do a shit. Is just matter of time that other guy will drown the site with requestests.[/UWSL]
WTF is your last word?

[UWSL]as you can see there's more to lose than win if these threads (that have nothing to do with inceldom discussion) are allowed.[/UWSL]
The lowered quality of women as their cock carousal count rises from single to double digits until they become triple-digit roasties is a long-accepted aspect of inceldom discussion.

It relates to debates regarding whether these foids can truly still be called female as the % of their body composed of Chad's cum rises.

We require freedom to acknowledge that foids creampied by dozens of chads suffer microchimerism which turns their internal biochem into hermaphrodites making fucking them homosexual.

We allow volceldom in relation to male or partially male humans.
I wanna agree on the terms of enemy making, as if anything will get the site shut down, it’s those polls that say “would you fuck a 12 year old” or some shit. All it’s gonna do is cause trouble.
any thread we make which offends radical pseudo-feminists will get axed if you let concern-trolling like this snowball, there will always be another issue
cuckold thread
no we term guys like OP the "biddy" because he willingly does bidding of others

cuckolds are ignorant of how they are victimized, that's differnet
Some of us agree with the general thrust of your post, but think that your prescription is overly censorius

Link should give you a 2-day ban for this homosexual content
 
Last edited:
Disagreed. Femoids decline faster than ever and setting an arbitrary standard on which age attraction to a developed femoid is permissible goes against the tenants of the blackpill. Paging @Meus @NorthernWind @Zensfy @Yamete @SellingGf10k @SlutLiberationFront @faded @Lolimancer and @Arescel on the matter
 
Yeah a 10 year old will have the same pussy as a 20 year old or a 30 year old :feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:
Age of consent should be based on the size of your dick :feelsLightsaber: Dickcels are only adequate for literal children.
 
A life before feminism and agecuckism...

Image 5
 
How about not talking about underage girls? It's one of the reasons why I stopped coming here.
It doesn't matter what they did way back in the day or in third world countries; on average qe have longer life spans now
 
@Fat Link I told you to ban this faggot, this is an alt of "itallfelldown".
Seriously it may even be a foid.
 
How about not talking about underage girls? It's one of the reasons why I stopped coming here.
It doesn't matter what they did way back in the day or in third world countries; on average qe have longer life spans now
If you stopped coming here because talk about muh underage girls offends you, you're too much of a soy. The site does not need to stop talking about girls under 18 to appease you.

Also the longer lifespans argument is shit since the lower lifespans in the past were often due to high infant mortality rates.
 
You didn't get my point. I just said that these discussions shouldn't be allowed because they create more enemies for the community.
it wont make a difference, they already hate us
 
If you stopped coming here because talk about muh underage girls offends you, you're too much of a soy. The site does not need to stop talking about girls under 18 to appease you.

Also the longer lifespans argument is shit since the lower lifespans in the past were often due to high infant mortality rates.
It was due to sickness, work related injuries and higher mortality rates during child birth. The whole pedo thing was one.of the reason I stopped coming. The second being I forgot the damn site address. I had been here through three site changes and somehow my mind forgot about .is at the end. Life got hectic fast.
There was a spinoff site a (former) member made for those of us that liked anime and waifus and that site was over ran by members talking about pedo crap. It is one thing if an 18/19 year old is talking about wanting to get with a 15-17 year old girl. It's another for 30+ something year olds talking 13 about year olds.
 
The most common arguments to defend taste toward underage foids:

1. Virgin foids(who are usually below 14 yo) are more loyal: fair point. There's data that proves this fact . That foids with least sexual partners are more loyal. Sadly, that data was gathered from foids that got married over 20 years ago. Nowadays they will dump you unless she doesn't have Internet and doesn't go to school. Is too bluepilled to think that these foids are programmable. Such thing requieres a systematic change.

2. Underage foids are tighter: No. Is genetical. Is the same thing as dick size. If you already dicked foids you should know that.

3. Underage foids are already fucking Chad: fair point nothing to discusss. But an adult man doing it is taboo and adding this taste to the incel strawman is bad for the last problem I will list below.

4. Taste for underage foids is common among men: Yes nothing to discuss. For that reason landwhales(mainly the young ones) used to feel ashamed of themselves. In fact: in escorting forums teen like escorts are the most desirable and expensive.

5. "Incel detractors will find other way to screw up the community". Cope. Those are often the ER threads, volcel threads and defending threads of this topic.

6. Is free speech: Yeah, but is contributing to the incel strawman. Also calling agecuck someone who doesn't support it gives the vibe that is a general concensus. Is practically outcasting of the community for someone that has nothing to do with inceldom discussion.

The problem is that:
1. Defending this position is not part of inceldom discussion. How it affects you if the underage foid will accuse you anyway? When is posted it gives the vibe that is a general concensus like the blackpills.

2. The second and most imoportant problem leads to create more enemies. Therefore the site is more prone to be attacked or be shut down. Personally: I love this site. i love this community. It would've been a nice experience to be in braincels. But it is already in the eye of the hurricane. If this site gives the vibe that pedofilia, [UWSL]hebephilia and ephebophilia are general concensus we will gain more enemies. It has been proven that FBI or feds don't have to do a shit. Is just matter of time that other guy will drown the site with requestests. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]as you can see there's more to lose than win if these threads (that have nothing to do with inceldom discussion) are allowed.[/UWSL]
:feelshehe:

View: https://youtu.be/N9vUNDY45Jc
 
Was this really alt? If so this goy is obsessed with targeting JB pills. Cope and seethe.
 

Similar threads

Sinbad Gehenna
Replies
39
Views
589
GeorgeSears
GeorgeSears
Persecuted
Replies
12
Views
356
UsernameIsRequired
UsernameIsRequired
Jefferson35
Replies
15
Views
474
Biowaste Removal
B

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top