Background information: There is much debate in the incellosphere regarding class of males. What is chad and normie and such questions are frequently rised. Therefor I feel there is a need for a simple, standardized, sociological framework that everyone can atleast partially agree on. I will present such a system based mostly on Pierre Bordieu's seminal work on class systems in France.
As in the P. Bordieu framework there are 3 forms of capital, looks, personality and money. This may provoke some hardcore blackpillers that claim it's all about looks (and money if you want to betabuxx). I think this is a too unneuanced way to look at the sexual markets, the reason for this being a mentalcel with autism may look OK enough but struggle sexually due to exclusion and such. Besides we have all experienced a status-maxxed uggo getting laid. Personality must therefor have an affect.
Incels are defined in the typical way and research shows that we constitute about 20% of males. We are the lowest of the lowest and our only way out is betabuxxing. We will never ascend to getting sex based on anything besides money because of the attraction ceiling. If you are an adult male virgin you are probably below the attraction ceiling. Betabuxxing is a very common phenomenon and I therefor define the betabuxxes as a low form of normies. How ever they are below the attraction ceiling and will suffer from sexless relationsships. High-tier normies are the first class to have the opportunity to get sex from other attributes than money. They are attractive to atleast some women. Chads make up 20% of the population and are what 80% of women set their expectations at. They are mostly successful in all area.
Suggestion for futher research: how does different capital composition determine your class, what is the difference between the sexually attractive classes. What constitutes personality and how to become a winner in personality maxxing. How much money is needed to become betabuxxer, proof of my claim of an attraction ceiling and so on.
As in the P. Bordieu framework there are 3 forms of capital, looks, personality and money. This may provoke some hardcore blackpillers that claim it's all about looks (and money if you want to betabuxx). I think this is a too unneuanced way to look at the sexual markets, the reason for this being a mentalcel with autism may look OK enough but struggle sexually due to exclusion and such. Besides we have all experienced a status-maxxed uggo getting laid. Personality must therefor have an affect.
Incels are defined in the typical way and research shows that we constitute about 20% of males. We are the lowest of the lowest and our only way out is betabuxxing. We will never ascend to getting sex based on anything besides money because of the attraction ceiling. If you are an adult male virgin you are probably below the attraction ceiling. Betabuxxing is a very common phenomenon and I therefor define the betabuxxes as a low form of normies. How ever they are below the attraction ceiling and will suffer from sexless relationsships. High-tier normies are the first class to have the opportunity to get sex from other attributes than money. They are attractive to atleast some women. Chads make up 20% of the population and are what 80% of women set their expectations at. They are mostly successful in all area.
Suggestion for futher research: how does different capital composition determine your class, what is the difference between the sexually attractive classes. What constitutes personality and how to become a winner in personality maxxing. How much money is needed to become betabuxxer, proof of my claim of an attraction ceiling and so on.
