Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [Study] [Juicy] Study finds foid scientists turn out to be shit without male guidance in their careers

Babica Yaga

Babica Yaga

Untermensch subhuman genetic trash
★★★
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
3,227

Published in Nature Communications

Abstract
We study mentorship in scientific collaborations, where a junior scientist is supported by potentially multiple senior collaborators, without them necessarily having formal supervisory roles. We identify 3 million mentor–protégé pairs and survey a random sample, verifying that their relationship involved some form of mentorship. We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors. We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors. While current diversity policies encourage same-gender mentorships to retain women in academia, our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career. These findings add a new perspective to the policy debate on how to best elevate the status of women in science.

---
TLDR:

We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors.

We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a
reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors.

In other words:

Foids NEED to have male mentors if they want to succeed and have an impactful scientific career after their mentorships.

Look at the reactions it's been receiving and the soy SJW lefty foid professors and PhD's responding on Twitter LMFAO



View: https://twitter.com/CarolynBertozzi/status/1329100008918978567



View: https://twitter.com/skepchicks/status/1329172344460500992



View: https://twitter.com/niknikkums/status/1329145648717959171



"GarBaGe aLErT. HOW DARE YOU SAY WAHMEN CAN'T BE GOOD MENTORS LIKE MEN!! YOU FILTHY MISOGYNISTIC, PRIVILEGED, STOOPID WHITE MALES!!" :soy::soy:

The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased. :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
More evidence that women are garbage.
 
MORE THAN 100% BASED
FUCK FOIDS
PERIMETER OF A FRACTAL IQ PAPER
 
More evidence that women are garbage.
It would be better for society if they just went back to the kitchen and fulfilled their traditional roles, because as evidenced again they literally suck at everything.
 
More evidence that women are garbage.
It would be better for society if they just went back to the kitchen and fulfilled their traditional roles, because as evidenced again they literally suck at everything.
but this time we should apply eugenics to them so they won't turn into whores for good, hypergamy must be wiped out of the species
 
but this time we should apply eugenics to them so they won't turn into whores for good, hypergamy must be wiped out of the species
Wipe out cucks like these as well while we're at it


View: https://twitter.com/millerjm86/status/1328765642372042753
Optimized rsz enmpycbwmaiuaqp 1


"oK aLL, thIs NeW papER In @NatURecOmms ReALLy Has ME Sad/COnfusEd/aNGRy"
 
The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.
 
Foids and soys seething at a paper published in the most prestigious journal on the planet. Brilliant.
The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.

:feelshaha:
 
Foids are incapable of thinking for themselves, they always need someone to hold their hand
 
The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.
Based :feelskek:
Nicolette here get's it :feelshmm:
Only high iq post by a foid on that thread :feelskek:
Isn't that a highly reputed journal?
Yes Nature is the most prestigious scientific journal, though Nature Communications is technically a "mega-journal" ie like a sub journal of Nature but still has high impact factor (articles in it are often cited by other researchers)
 
This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.
 

Published in Nature Communications

Abstract
We study mentorship in scientific collaborations, where a junior scientist is supported by potentially multiple senior collaborators, without them necessarily having formal supervisory roles. We identify 3 million mentor–protégé pairs and survey a random sample, verifying that their relationship involved some form of mentorship. We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors. We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors. While current diversity policies encourage same-gender mentorships to retain women in academia, our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career. These findings add a new perspective to the policy debate on how to best elevate the status of women in science.

---
TLDR:

We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors.

We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a
reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors.

In other words:

Foids NEED to have male mentors if they want to succeed and have an impactful scientific career after their mentorships.

Look at the reactions it's been receiving and the soy SJW lefty foid professors and PhD's responding on Twitter LMFAO



View: https://twitter.com/CarolynBertozzi/status/1329100008918978567



View: https://twitter.com/skepchicks/status/1329172344460500992



View: https://twitter.com/niknikkums/status/1329145648717959171



"GarBaGe aLErT. HOW DARE YOU SAY WAHMEN CAN'T BE GOOD MENTORS LIKE MEN!! YOU FILTHY MISOGYNISTIC, PRIVILEGED, STOOPID WHITE MALES!!" :soy::soy:

The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased. :feelskek: :feelskek:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpB83chNBQc
 
No wonder single mom households are shitshows
 
Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would still be in the stoneage.
 

Lol I noticed these people are starting to include their pronouns in their twitter bios "he/him" :lul:

It's over... :feelsrope:

This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.
Absolutely
 
Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would still be in the stoneage.
almost too based
 
Good morning women are low iq
Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would be dead.
 
The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased. :feelskek: :feelskek:
[/QUOTE]

From searching on twitter, it seems these triggered soys were smart enough not say anything about that. Report written in Abu dhabi........ Based since I'm still in the city for the next few weeks.
 
Quick update: The paper has been retracted.
Editor’s Note: Readers are alerted that this paper is subject to criticisms that are being considered by the editors. Those criticisms were targeted to the authors’ interpretation of their data that gender plays a role in the success of mentoring relationships between junior and senior researchers, in a way that undermines the role of female mentors and mentees. We are investigating the concerns raised and an editorial response will follow the resolution of these issues.

Just felt the need to address this as it shows ((they)) will go as far as to censor scientific knowledge if it doesn't align with their belief systems. Truly saddening.
 
Quick update: The paper has been retracted.


Just felt the need to address this as it shows ((they)) will go as far as to censor scientific knowledge if it doesn't align with their belief systems. Truly saddening.
JFL, "I LoVE sCieNce" :soy:
Yet when the paper shows women are incompetent at mentoring. "ThIS SiEnTIfic PaPer is my sogy kneeee" :feels:
 
This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top