JackAutismo
Banned
-
- Joined
- May 5, 2018
- Posts
- 502
The think is, everyone knows it’s true.IncelTears wont touch this one
The researchers found that in the mundane, non-threatening scenario (asking for a pen) attractiveness made no difference in compliance. An equal amount of women (96 percent) said they would give the guy a pen. It also made no difference in their perception of his personality.
However, in the more threatening scenario (asking to take a picture) attractiveness absolutely played a role—not in compliance but in judging his character.
A majority of women (96 percent) said they would not allow the man to take their picture, regardless of whether he was attractive or not. But the women judged the unattractive man much more harshly for asking, assuming him to be a creep or a bad person.
"Facially unattractive males receive a more negative response in terms of perceived characteristics from violating social norms than facially attractive males," explain the researchers. Adding, "A devil effect occurred amplifying the negative feelings toward the unattractive male."
Essentially, as the researchers explain, this means unattractive men won't necessarily be judged on their looks until they mess up or violate social norms, in which case they will be judged even more harshly.
For example, if a man is on trial for a crime and happens to be unattractive, his character will be judged more harshly by a jury than that of an attractive man.
Read how they judge the moral worth of the guys in the less socially accepted scenario- although they turn down Chad, they don’t view him as creepy (even though the request was deliberately made to be creepy).Never began boyos
Sub8 theory FUCKING CONFIRMED.Read how they judge the moral worth of the guys in the less socially accepted scenario- although they turn down Chad, they don’t view him as creepy (even though the request was deliberately made to be creepy).
IncelTears wont touch this one