Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill STUDY: 62% OF FOIDS FANTASIZE GETTING RAPED

sennaGTR

sennaGTR

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jul 3, 2024
Posts
274
Study: PDF:
1722142247004



In this study from 2009, 355 female undergraduates (college foids, not teenagers) participated in a study that surveyed if and how often they had rape fantasies. Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy, For women who have had rape fantasies, the median frequency of these fantasies was about 4 times per year, with 14%of participants reporting that they had rape fantasies at least once a week. Here are the details. (pay attention to the red underlined text like this, it contains blackpilling data.)

The women in the study:
  • 355 undergraduate women, from two universities in the united states.
  • 81% of the participants were between ages 18-21
  • 90% were single !!
  • 91% were heterosexual
  • 78% were christian
demographic:
  • 59% Caucasian-white
  • 16% African American black
  • 13% Hispanic-Latina
  • 6% Biracial
  • 5% Asian
  • 1% Native Indian
What’s crazy to me is that you could go to college in 2008 and find mostly christian, single, straight women on campus aged 18-21, must’ve been fun to be chad then, anyways.

procedure:​

1722143257132


participants filled out a "Sexual fantasy checklist", then a "sexual fantasy log" where participants had to write a sexual fantasy that they had which involved sexual aggresion or sexual coercion against them. Then they were asked questions about the beginning, middle, and end of the fantasy, the description of the characters in the fantasy (oh boy) how they would rate the fantasy's sexual arousal on a scale of 0 to 4, how unconsenting they were in the fantasy, how attractive the perpetrator was, etc.

There was no misunderstanding about what qualified as rape, "rape fantasy" was described as:
  • the use of force or incapacitation against the will of the woman
  • resulting in vaginal, anal, or oral contact/penetration
  • regardless of sexual acts that may have taken place consensually

The results:​

1722144307812


for the first question, "do you fantasize about being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against your will":
  • 48% said they don't
  • 17.2% said they fantasize once a year
  • 13.5% fantasized about it a few times a year
  • 10.4% fantasized about it EVERY MONTH
  • 5.9% fantasized about it once a WEEK
  • 4.5% fantasized about it four or five times a week
  • 0.3% fantasized about it several times a day.
in the sex fantasy logs, where women described the sexual fantasies they have had:
  • 63% of fantasies contained non-consensual vaginal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained non-consensual anal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained hair-pulling
  • 22% of fantasies contained being pushed
  • 24% of fantasies contained the woman pushing the rapist/perpetrator away
  • 49% of fantasies were initially resistant, later willing
  • 12% of fantasies were initially willing, later resistant
  • 35% of fantasies were resistant throughout the entire fantasy
  • 46% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an ex-partner or current partner (remember 90% of participants were single)
  • 21% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as a stranger
  • 14% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an acquaintance
  • 50% of fantasies imagined vaginal intercourse being consensual at some point in the fantasy
  • 30% of fantasies contained consensual kissing at some point in the fantasy
  • 23% of fantasies contained non-consensual kissing in the fantasy
  • 38% of the women felt positive or glad to have the fantasy
  • 33% had negative and guilty feelings about the fantasy
  • 28% had both positive and negative feelings about the fantasy.
after collecting systematic data on the fantasies, the fantasies were studied in detail to look for overall patterns:


The aversive (unwanted) rape fantasies (9% of the fantasies) were usually brief in description, the other rape fantasies, the more erotic and "enjoyable" ones, were two to three times longer than the unwanted ones. The aversive fantasies had a "dark alley" pattern, the woman imagined a scene where they were attacked and raped while in a situation like walking alone to her car or sleeping alone in her apartment. In all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character’s expression of non-consent was genuine, and this is in sharp contrast to the erotic rape fantasies. In nearly all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character remained resistant throughout the fantasy, which again was more common in aversive than in erotic rape fantasies. In over half of aversive rape fantasies, the perpetrator was either a stranger or ‘‘faceless.’’ Although the perpetrator was a relative in 18% of aversive fantasies, the perpetrator was never a relative in the other two types of rape fantasy. The perpetrator in aversive fantasies was less attractive than the perpetrator in the other rape fantasies, and the only perpetrator motive identified in aversive rape fantasies was to hurt or degradethe self-character. here is an example of an aversive rape fantasy, with spelling errors corrected:

1722144958187


The EROTIC fantasies (45% of the fantasies) had a pattern of a "not right now" scenario, where the consent was low and changed during the fantasy, the woman became excited at the idea of sex but expressed non-consent for reasons like fear of getting caught or not wanting sex with a forbidden partner (a friend's boyfriend) or so. In nearly half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in one-fifth, he was an acquaintance. The perpetrator in these fantasies was rated as highly physically attractive, more attractive than the perpetrator in the aversive rape fantasies. In nearly one half of the erotic rape fantasies, the perpetrator was perceived as being driven either by his physical or romantic attraction toward the woman.

here is an example. this is the MOST BRUTAL fucking example:

1722145161955

what the fuck. did this foid just admit to dreaming about getting raped by a chad while she was in a relationship?. THEN ended up in a relationship with him? :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously:

The rest of the fantasies - the remaining 46% - were "erotic-aversive" fantasies. 80% of these fantasies contained genuine non-consent from the woman. A lot of them had the pattern of a "partner going too far". These rape fantasieswere a mixture of fear, excitement, and sexual arousal.They were both sexually arousing and somewhat unpleasant. In a large majority of erotic–aversive rape fantasies,the non-consent was real for the self-character. These fantasies showed a broad pattern of changes in consent. In nearly one half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in nearly one-fourth,the perpetrator was a stranger. The perpetrator in these fantasies was typically rated as moderately attractive. Here is an example:

1722145431509


conclusion​

foids think about rape - 62% of them apparently. water is wet. But a lot of foids think about being raped by their ex, their friends boyfriend, a lot of them have EROTIC rape fantasies. if you randomly collect a few hundred of them, FORTY FIVE PERCENT, 45% !!!! will write down a fucking enjoyable rape fantasy about being fucked against their will by AN ATTRACTIVE CHAD, and have no negative feelings about it afterwards. another 46% of them will write about a CHADLITE or "moderately ttractive perpetrator" going too far and sticking it in their anus or some shit, making them feel excitied and unhappy. The rest will write about UNATTRACTIVE FACELESS INCELS FUCKING THEM.

moral of the story, respawn as a chad, and you can cause almost half of foids to dream about you raping them. Chads live in a different fucking world :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsseriously::feelsseriously::feelsseriously:
 
You should change the title to " raped by Chad's"
 
they fantasize about getting raped by me specifically
 
maybe thats why they are so obsessed with consent
 
Study: PDF: View attachment 1208918


In this study from 2009, 355 female undergraduates (college foids, not teenagers) participated in a study that surveyed if and how often they had rape fantasies. Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy, For women who have had rape fantasies, the median frequency of these fantasies was about 4 times per year, with 14%of participants reporting that they had rape fantasies at least once a week. Here are the details. (pay attention to the red underlined text like this, it contains blackpilling data.)

The women in the study:
  • 355 undergraduate women, from two universities in the united states.
  • 81% of the participants were between ages 18-21
  • 90% were single !!
  • 91% were heterosexual
  • 78% were christian
demographic:
  • 59% Caucasian-white
  • 16% African American black
  • 13% Hispanic-Latina
  • 6% Biracial
  • 5% Asian
  • 1% Native Indian
What’s crazy to me is that you could go to college in 2008 and find mostly christian, single, straight women on campus aged 18-21, must’ve been fun to be chad then, anyways.

procedure:​

View attachment 1208926

participants filled out a "Sexual fantasy checklist", then a "sexual fantasy log" where participants had to write a sexual fantasy that they had which involved sexual aggresion or sexual coercion against them. Then they were asked questions about the beginning, middle, and end of the fantasy, the description of the characters in the fantasy (oh boy) how they would rate the fantasy's sexual arousal on a scale of 0 to 4, how unconsenting they were in the fantasy, how attractive the perpetrator was, etc.

There was no misunderstanding about what qualified as rape, "rape fantasy" was described as:
  • the use of force or incapacitation against the will of the woman
  • resulting in vaginal, anal, or oral contact/penetration
  • regardless of sexual acts that may have taken place consensually

The results:​

View attachment 1208931

for the first question, "do you fantasize about being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against your will":
  • 48% said they don't
  • 17.2% said they fantasize once a year
  • 13.5% fantasized about it a few times a year
  • 10.4% fantasized about it EVERY MONTH
  • 5.9% fantasized about it once a WEEK
  • 4.5% fantasized about it four or five times a week
  • 0.3% fantasized about it several times a day.
in the sex fantasy logs, where women described the sexual fantasies they have had:
  • 63% of fantasies contained non-consensual vaginal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained non-consensual anal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained hair-pulling
  • 22% of fantasies contained being pushed
  • 24% of fantasies contained the woman pushing the rapist/perpetrator away
  • 49% of fantasies were initially resistant, later willing
  • 12% of fantasies were initially willing, later resistant
  • 35% of fantasies were resistant throughout the entire fantasy
  • 46% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an ex-partner or current partner (remember 90% of participants were single)
  • 21% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as a stranger
  • 14% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an acquaintance
  • 50% of fantasies imagined vaginal intercourse being consensual at some point in the fantasy
  • 30% of fantasies contained consensual kissing at some point in the fantasy
  • 23% of fantasies contained non-consensual kissing in the fantasy
  • 38% of the women felt positive or glad to have the fantasy
  • 33% had negative and guilty feelings about the fantasy
  • 28% had both positive and negative feelings about the fantasy.
after collecting systematic data on the fantasies, the fantasies were studied in detail to look for overall patterns:


The aversive (unwanted) rape fantasies (9% of the fantasies) were usually brief in description, the other rape fantasies, the more erotic and "enjoyable" ones, were two to three times longer than the unwanted ones. The aversive fantasies had a "dark alley" pattern, the woman imagined a scene where they were attacked and raped while in a situation like walking alone to her car or sleeping alone in her apartment. In all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character’s expression of non-consent was genuine, and this is in sharp contrast to the erotic rape fantasies. In nearly all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character remained resistant throughout the fantasy, which again was more common in aversive than in erotic rape fantasies. In over half of aversive rape fantasies, the perpetrator was either a stranger or ‘‘faceless.’’ Although the perpetrator was a relative in 18% of aversive fantasies, the perpetrator was never a relative in the other two types of rape fantasy. The perpetrator in aversive fantasies was less attractive than the perpetrator in the other rape fantasies, and the only perpetrator motive identified in aversive rape fantasies was to hurt or degradethe self-character. here is an example of an aversive rape fantasy, with spelling errors corrected:

View attachment 1208938

The EROTIC fantasies (45% of the fantasies) had a pattern of a "not right now" scenario, where the consent was low and changed during the fantasy, the woman became excited at the idea of sex but expressed non-consent for reasons like fear of getting caught or not wanting sex with a forbidden partner (a friend's boyfriend) or so. In nearly half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in one-fifth, he was an acquaintance. The perpetrator in these fantasies was rated as highly physically attractive, more attractive than the perpetrator in the aversive rape fantasies. In nearly one half of the erotic rape fantasies, the perpetrator was perceived as being driven either by his physical or romantic attraction toward the woman.

here is an example. this is the MOST BRUTAL fucking example:

View attachment 1208939
what the fuck. did this foid just admit to dreaming about getting raped by a chad while she was in a relationship?. THEN ended up in a relationship with him? :feelseriously: :feelseriously: :feelseriously: :feelseriously:

Il resto delle fantasie, il restante 46%, erano fantasie "erotico-avversive". L'80% di queste fantasie conteneva un autentico non consenso da parte della donna. Molte di esse avevano il modello di un "partner che esagera". Queste fantasie di stupro erano un misto di paura, eccitazione ed eccitazione sessuale. Erano sia sessualmente eccitanti che in qualche modo spiacevoli. Nella grande maggioranza delle fantasie di stupro erotico-avversive, il non consenso era reale per il personaggio. Queste fantasie mostravano un ampio modello di cambiamenti nel consenso. In quasi la metà di queste fantasie, l'autore era un partner o un ex partner; e in quasi un quarto, l'autore era uno sconosciuto. L'autore in queste fantasie era in genere valutato come moderatamente attraente. Ecco un esempio:

View attachment 1208940

conclusione​

i foidi pensano allo stupro, a quanto pare il 62% di loro. L'acqua è bagnata. Ma molti foidi pensano di essere stuprati dal loro ex, dal fidanzato del loro amico, molti di loro hanno fantasie EROTICHE di stupro. Se ne raccogli a caso alcune centinaia, IL QUARANTACINQUE PER CENTO, IL 45%!!!! scriverà una fottuta fantasia di stupro piacevole, di essere scopati contro la loro volontà da UN ATTRAENTE CHAD, e non avrà sentimenti negativi in seguito. Un altro 46% di loro scriverà di un CHADLITE o "perpetratore moderatamente attraente" che esagera e glielo infila nell'ano o qualche altra merda, facendoli sentire eccitati e infelici. Il resto scriverà di INCEL SENZA VOLTO POCO ATTRAENTI CHE LI SCOPANO.

morale della favola, risorgi come un chad, e puoi far sì che quasi la metà dei foids sognino che tu li stupri . I chad vivono in un mondo diverso, cazzo :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelseriously::feelseriously::feelseriously:
IT s over
 
I think the biggest problem with non-nt is that they are very rational and respect consent more than other men
 
I think the biggest problem with non-nt is that they are very rational and respect consent more than other men
This is probably a turn off for foids tbh. Why is it a turn off? There’s less for the foid to manipulate him with. She could easily call for Rape accusations if the sex wasn’t fully consensual.

I’ve thought once that people who have sex the man should record an audio or video and it should show the foid clearly stating the sex they’re about to have is consensual.
 
This is probably a turn off for foids tbh. Why is it a turn off? There’s less for the foid to manipulate him with. She could easily call for Rape accusations if the sex wasn’t fully consensual.

I’ve thought once that people who have sex the man should record an audio or video and it should show the foid clearly stating the sex they’re about to have is consensual.
Yes, you have to be a atleast a bit irrational to approach women in fact, anything can be considered harassment
 
Study: PDF: View attachment 1208918


In this study from 2009, 355 female undergraduates (college foids, not teenagers) participated in a study that surveyed if and how often they had rape fantasies. Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy, For women who have had rape fantasies, the median frequency of these fantasies was about 4 times per year, with 14%of participants reporting that they had rape fantasies at least once a week. Here are the details. (pay attention to the red underlined text like this, it contains blackpilling data.)

The women in the study:
  • 355 undergraduate women, from two universities in the united states.
  • 81% of the participants were between ages 18-21
  • 90% were single !!
  • 91% were heterosexual
  • 78% were christian
demographic:
  • 59% Caucasian-white
  • 16% African American black
  • 13% Hispanic-Latina
  • 6% Biracial
  • 5% Asian
  • 1% Native Indian
What’s crazy to me is that you could go to college in 2008 and find mostly christian, single, straight women on campus aged 18-21, must’ve been fun to be chad then, anyways.

procedure:​

View attachment 1208926

participants filled out a "Sexual fantasy checklist", then a "sexual fantasy log" where participants had to write a sexual fantasy that they had which involved sexual aggresion or sexual coercion against them. Then they were asked questions about the beginning, middle, and end of the fantasy, the description of the characters in the fantasy (oh boy) how they would rate the fantasy's sexual arousal on a scale of 0 to 4, how unconsenting they were in the fantasy, how attractive the perpetrator was, etc.

There was no misunderstanding about what qualified as rape, "rape fantasy" was described as:
  • the use of force or incapacitation against the will of the woman
  • resulting in vaginal, anal, or oral contact/penetration
  • regardless of sexual acts that may have taken place consensually

The results:​

View attachment 1208931

for the first question, "do you fantasize about being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against your will":
  • 48% said they don't
  • 17.2% said they fantasize once a year
  • 13.5% fantasized about it a few times a year
  • 10.4% fantasized about it EVERY MONTH
  • 5.9% fantasized about it once a WEEK
  • 4.5% fantasized about it four or five times a week
  • 0.3% fantasized about it several times a day.
in the sex fantasy logs, where women described the sexual fantasies they have had:
  • 63% of fantasies contained non-consensual vaginal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained non-consensual anal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained hair-pulling
  • 22% of fantasies contained being pushed
  • 24% of fantasies contained the woman pushing the rapist/perpetrator away
  • 49% of fantasies were initially resistant, later willing
  • 12% of fantasies were initially willing, later resistant
  • 35% of fantasies were resistant throughout the entire fantasy
  • 46% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an ex-partner or current partner (remember 90% of participants were single)
  • 21% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as a stranger
  • 14% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an acquaintance
  • 50% of fantasies imagined vaginal intercourse being consensual at some point in the fantasy
  • 30% of fantasies contained consensual kissing at some point in the fantasy
  • 23% of fantasies contained non-consensual kissing in the fantasy
  • 38% of the women felt positive or glad to have the fantasy
  • 33% had negative and guilty feelings about the fantasy
  • 28% had both positive and negative feelings about the fantasy.
after collecting systematic data on the fantasies, the fantasies were studied in detail to look for overall patterns:


The aversive (unwanted) rape fantasies (9% of the fantasies) were usually brief in description, the other rape fantasies, the more erotic and "enjoyable" ones, were two to three times longer than the unwanted ones. The aversive fantasies had a "dark alley" pattern, the woman imagined a scene where they were attacked and raped while in a situation like walking alone to her car or sleeping alone in her apartment. In all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character’s expression of non-consent was genuine, and this is in sharp contrast to the erotic rape fantasies. In nearly all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character remained resistant throughout the fantasy, which again was more common in aversive than in erotic rape fantasies. In over half of aversive rape fantasies, the perpetrator was either a stranger or ‘‘faceless.’’ Although the perpetrator was a relative in 18% of aversive fantasies, the perpetrator was never a relative in the other two types of rape fantasy. The perpetrator in aversive fantasies was less attractive than the perpetrator in the other rape fantasies, and the only perpetrator motive identified in aversive rape fantasies was to hurt or degradethe self-character. here is an example of an aversive rape fantasy, with spelling errors corrected:

View attachment 1208938

The EROTIC fantasies (45% of the fantasies) had a pattern of a "not right now" scenario, where the consent was low and changed during the fantasy, the woman became excited at the idea of sex but expressed non-consent for reasons like fear of getting caught or not wanting sex with a forbidden partner (a friend's boyfriend) or so. In nearly half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in one-fifth, he was an acquaintance. The perpetrator in these fantasies was rated as highly physically attractive, more attractive than the perpetrator in the aversive rape fantasies. In nearly one half of the erotic rape fantasies, the perpetrator was perceived as being driven either by his physical or romantic attraction toward the woman.

here is an example. this is the MOST BRUTAL fucking example:

View attachment 1208939
what the fuck. did this foid just admit to dreaming about getting raped by a chad while she was in a relationship?. THEN ended up in a relationship with him? :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously:

The rest of the fantasies - the remaining 46% - were "erotic-aversive" fantasies. 80% of these fantasies contained genuine non-consent from the woman. A lot of them had the pattern of a "partner going too far". These rape fantasieswere a mixture of fear, excitement, and sexual arousal.They were both sexually arousing and somewhat unpleasant. In a large majority of erotic–aversive rape fantasies,the non-consent was real for the self-character. These fantasies showed a broad pattern of changes in consent. In nearly one half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in nearly one-fourth,the perpetrator was a stranger. The perpetrator in these fantasies was typically rated as moderately attractive. Here is an example:

View attachment 1208940

conclusion​

foids think about rape - 62% of them apparently. water is wet. But a lot of foids think about being raped by their ex, their friends boyfriend, a lot of them have EROTIC rape fantasies. if you randomly collect a few hundred of them, FORTY FIVE PERCENT, 45% !!!! will write down a fucking enjoyable rape fantasy about being fucked against their will by AN ATTRACTIVE CHAD, and have no negative feelings about it afterwards. another 46% of them will write about a CHADLITE or "moderately ttractive perpetrator" going too far and sticking it in their anus or some shit, making them feel excitied and unhappy. The rest will write about UNATTRACTIVE FACELESS INCELS FUCKING THEM.

moral of the story, respawn as a chad, and you can cause almost half of foids to dream about you raping them. Chads live in a different fucking world :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsseriously::feelsseriously::feelsseriously:
"Christian":feelsPop::feelsclown:
I'm Christian but I want to be raped(sex before/outside marriage) by attractive strangers and not have boring consenting sex from my "loving" husband.:foidSoy::foidSoy:
 
Study: PDF: View attachment 1208918


In this study from 2009, 355 female undergraduates (college foids, not teenagers) participated in a study that surveyed if and how often they had rape fantasies. Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy, For women who have had rape fantasies, the median frequency of these fantasies was about 4 times per year, with 14%of participants reporting that they had rape fantasies at least once a week. Here are the details. (pay attention to the red underlined text like this, it contains blackpilling data.)

The women in the study:
  • 355 undergraduate women, from two universities in the united states.
  • 81% of the participants were between ages 18-21
  • 90% were single !!
  • 91% were heterosexual
  • 78% were christian
demographic:
  • 59% Caucasian-white
  • 16% African American black
  • 13% Hispanic-Latina
  • 6% Biracial
  • 5% Asian
  • 1% Native Indian
What’s crazy to me is that you could go to college in 2008 and find mostly christian, single, straight women on campus aged 18-21, must’ve been fun to be chad then, anyways.

procedure:​

View attachment 1208926

participants filled out a "Sexual fantasy checklist", then a "sexual fantasy log" where participants had to write a sexual fantasy that they had which involved sexual aggresion or sexual coercion against them. Then they were asked questions about the beginning, middle, and end of the fantasy, the description of the characters in the fantasy (oh boy) how they would rate the fantasy's sexual arousal on a scale of 0 to 4, how unconsenting they were in the fantasy, how attractive the perpetrator was, etc.

There was no misunderstanding about what qualified as rape, "rape fantasy" was described as:
  • the use of force or incapacitation against the will of the woman
  • resulting in vaginal, anal, or oral contact/penetration
  • regardless of sexual acts that may have taken place consensually

The results:​

View attachment 1208931

for the first question, "do you fantasize about being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against your will":
  • 48% said they don't
  • 17.2% said they fantasize once a year
  • 13.5% fantasized about it a few times a year
  • 10.4% fantasized about it EVERY MONTH
  • 5.9% fantasized about it once a WEEK
  • 4.5% fantasized about it four or five times a week
  • 0.3% fantasized about it several times a day.
in the sex fantasy logs, where women described the sexual fantasies they have had:
  • 63% of fantasies contained non-consensual vaginal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained non-consensual anal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained hair-pulling
  • 22% of fantasies contained being pushed
  • 24% of fantasies contained the woman pushing the rapist/perpetrator away
  • 49% of fantasies were initially resistant, later willing
  • 12% of fantasies were initially willing, later resistant
  • 35% of fantasies were resistant throughout the entire fantasy
  • 46% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an ex-partner or current partner (remember 90% of participants were single)
  • 21% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as a stranger
  • 14% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an acquaintance
  • 50% of fantasies imagined vaginal intercourse being consensual at some point in the fantasy
  • 30% of fantasies contained consensual kissing at some point in the fantasy
  • 23% of fantasies contained non-consensual kissing in the fantasy
  • 38% of the women felt positive or glad to have the fantasy
  • 33% had negative and guilty feelings about the fantasy
  • 28% had both positive and negative feelings about the fantasy.
after collecting systematic data on the fantasies, the fantasies were studied in detail to look for overall patterns:


The aversive (unwanted) rape fantasies (9% of the fantasies) were usually brief in description, the other rape fantasies, the more erotic and "enjoyable" ones, were two to three times longer than the unwanted ones. The aversive fantasies had a "dark alley" pattern, the woman imagined a scene where they were attacked and raped while in a situation like walking alone to her car or sleeping alone in her apartment. In all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character’s expression of non-consent was genuine, and this is in sharp contrast to the erotic rape fantasies. In nearly all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character remained resistant throughout the fantasy, which again was more common in aversive than in erotic rape fantasies. In over half of aversive rape fantasies, the perpetrator was either a stranger or ‘‘faceless.’’ Although the perpetrator was a relative in 18% of aversive fantasies, the perpetrator was never a relative in the other two types of rape fantasy. The perpetrator in aversive fantasies was less attractive than the perpetrator in the other rape fantasies, and the only perpetrator motive identified in aversive rape fantasies was to hurt or degradethe self-character. here is an example of an aversive rape fantasy, with spelling errors corrected:

View attachment 1208938

The EROTIC fantasies (45% of the fantasies) had a pattern of a "not right now" scenario, where the consent was low and changed during the fantasy, the woman became excited at the idea of sex but expressed non-consent for reasons like fear of getting caught or not wanting sex with a forbidden partner (a friend's boyfriend) or so. In nearly half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in one-fifth, he was an acquaintance. The perpetrator in these fantasies was rated as highly physically attractive, more attractive than the perpetrator in the aversive rape fantasies. In nearly one half of the erotic rape fantasies, the perpetrator was perceived as being driven either by his physical or romantic attraction toward the woman.

here is an example. this is the MOST BRUTAL fucking example:

View attachment 1208939
what the fuck. did this foid just admit to dreaming about getting raped by a chad while she was in a relationship?. THEN ended up in a relationship with him? :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously:

The rest of the fantasies - the remaining 46% - were "erotic-aversive" fantasies. 80% of these fantasies contained genuine non-consent from the woman. A lot of them had the pattern of a "partner going too far". These rape fantasieswere a mixture of fear, excitement, and sexual arousal.They were both sexually arousing and somewhat unpleasant. In a large majority of erotic–aversive rape fantasies,the non-consent was real for the self-character. These fantasies showed a broad pattern of changes in consent. In nearly one half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in nearly one-fourth,the perpetrator was a stranger. The perpetrator in these fantasies was typically rated as moderately attractive. Here is an example:

View attachment 1208940

conclusion​

foids think about rape - 62% of them apparently. water is wet. But a lot of foids think about being raped by their ex, their friends boyfriend, a lot of them have EROTIC rape fantasies. if you randomly collect a few hundred of them, FORTY FIVE PERCENT, 45% !!!! will write down a fucking enjoyable rape fantasy about being fucked against their will by AN ATTRACTIVE CHAD, and have no negative feelings about it afterwards. another 46% of them will write about a CHADLITE or "moderately ttractive perpetrator" going too far and sticking it in their anus or some shit, making them feel excitied and unhappy. The rest will write about UNATTRACTIVE FACELESS INCELS FUCKING THEM.

moral of the story, respawn as a chad, and you can cause almost half of foids to dream about you raping them. Chads live in a different fucking world :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsseriously::feelsseriously::feelsseriously:
its not rape when she thinks you are attractive. But it suddenly becomes rape again when she can benefit from pressing charges
 
Study: PDF: View attachment 1208918


In this study from 2009, 355 female undergraduates (college foids, not teenagers) participated in a study that surveyed if and how often they had rape fantasies. Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy, For women who have had rape fantasies, the median frequency of these fantasies was about 4 times per year, with 14%of participants reporting that they had rape fantasies at least once a week. Here are the details. (pay attention to the red underlined text like this, it contains blackpilling data.)

The women in the study:
  • 355 undergraduate women, from two universities in the united states.
  • 81% of the participants were between ages 18-21
  • 90% were single !!
  • 91% were heterosexual
  • 78% were christian
demographic:
  • 59% Caucasian-white
  • 16% African American black
  • 13% Hispanic-Latina
  • 6% Biracial
  • 5% Asian
  • 1% Native Indian
What’s crazy to me is that you could go to college in 2008 and find mostly christian, single, straight women on campus aged 18-21, must’ve been fun to be chad then, anyways.

procedure:​

View attachment 1208926

participants filled out a "Sexual fantasy checklist", then a "sexual fantasy log" where participants had to write a sexual fantasy that they had which involved sexual aggresion or sexual coercion against them. Then they were asked questions about the beginning, middle, and end of the fantasy, the description of the characters in the fantasy (oh boy) how they would rate the fantasy's sexual arousal on a scale of 0 to 4, how unconsenting they were in the fantasy, how attractive the perpetrator was, etc.

There was no misunderstanding about what qualified as rape, "rape fantasy" was described as:
  • the use of force or incapacitation against the will of the woman
  • resulting in vaginal, anal, or oral contact/penetration
  • regardless of sexual acts that may have taken place consensually

The results:​

View attachment 1208931

for the first question, "do you fantasize about being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against your will":
  • 48% said they don't
  • 17.2% said they fantasize once a year
  • 13.5% fantasized about it a few times a year
  • 10.4% fantasized about it EVERY MONTH
  • 5.9% fantasized about it once a WEEK
  • 4.5% fantasized about it four or five times a week
  • 0.3% fantasized about it several times a day.
in the sex fantasy logs, where women described the sexual fantasies they have had:
  • 63% of fantasies contained non-consensual vaginal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained non-consensual anal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained hair-pulling
  • 22% of fantasies contained being pushed
  • 24% of fantasies contained the woman pushing the rapist/perpetrator away
  • 49% of fantasies were initially resistant, later willing
  • 12% of fantasies were initially willing, later resistant
  • 35% of fantasies were resistant throughout the entire fantasy
  • 46% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an ex-partner or current partner (remember 90% of participants were single)
  • 21% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as a stranger
  • 14% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an acquaintance
  • 50% of fantasies imagined vaginal intercourse being consensual at some point in the fantasy
  • 30% of fantasies contained consensual kissing at some point in the fantasy
  • 23% of fantasies contained non-consensual kissing in the fantasy
  • 38% of the women felt positive or glad to have the fantasy
  • 33% had negative and guilty feelings about the fantasy
  • 28% had both positive and negative feelings about the fantasy.
after collecting systematic data on the fantasies, the fantasies were studied in detail to look for overall patterns:


The aversive (unwanted) rape fantasies (9% of the fantasies) were usually brief in description, the other rape fantasies, the more erotic and "enjoyable" ones, were two to three times longer than the unwanted ones. The aversive fantasies had a "dark alley" pattern, the woman imagined a scene where they were attacked and raped while in a situation like walking alone to her car or sleeping alone in her apartment. In all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character’s expression of non-consent was genuine, and this is in sharp contrast to the erotic rape fantasies. In nearly all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character remained resistant throughout the fantasy, which again was more common in aversive than in erotic rape fantasies. In over half of aversive rape fantasies, the perpetrator was either a stranger or ‘‘faceless.’’ Although the perpetrator was a relative in 18% of aversive fantasies, the perpetrator was never a relative in the other two types of rape fantasy. The perpetrator in aversive fantasies was less attractive than the perpetrator in the other rape fantasies, and the only perpetrator motive identified in aversive rape fantasies was to hurt or degradethe self-character. here is an example of an aversive rape fantasy, with spelling errors corrected:

View attachment 1208938

The EROTIC fantasies (45% of the fantasies) had a pattern of a "not right now" scenario, where the consent was low and changed during the fantasy, the woman became excited at the idea of sex but expressed non-consent for reasons like fear of getting caught or not wanting sex with a forbidden partner (a friend's boyfriend) or so. In nearly half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in one-fifth, he was an acquaintance. The perpetrator in these fantasies was rated as highly physically attractive, more attractive than the perpetrator in the aversive rape fantasies. In nearly one half of the erotic rape fantasies, the perpetrator was perceived as being driven either by his physical or romantic attraction toward the woman.

here is an example. this is the MOST BRUTAL fucking example:

View attachment 1208939
what the fuck. did this foid just admit to dreaming about getting raped by a chad while she was in a relationship?. THEN ended up in a relationship with him? :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously:

The rest of the fantasies - the remaining 46% - were "erotic-aversive" fantasies. 80% of these fantasies contained genuine non-consent from the woman. A lot of them had the pattern of a "partner going too far". These rape fantasieswere a mixture of fear, excitement, and sexual arousal.They were both sexually arousing and somewhat unpleasant. In a large majority of erotic–aversive rape fantasies,the non-consent was real for the self-character. These fantasies showed a broad pattern of changes in consent. In nearly one half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in nearly one-fourth,the perpetrator was a stranger. The perpetrator in these fantasies was typically rated as moderately attractive. Here is an example:

View attachment 1208940

conclusion​

foids think about rape - 62% of them apparently. water is wet. But a lot of foids think about being raped by their ex, their friends boyfriend, a lot of them have EROTIC rape fantasies. if you randomly collect a few hundred of them, FORTY FIVE PERCENT, 45% !!!! will write down a fucking enjoyable rape fantasy about being fucked against their will by AN ATTRACTIVE CHAD, and have no negative feelings about it afterwards. another 46% of them will write about a CHADLITE or "moderately ttractive perpetrator" going too far and sticking it in their anus or some shit, making them feel excitied and unhappy. The rest will write about UNATTRACTIVE FACELESS INCELS FUCKING THEM.

moral of the story, respawn as a chad, and you can cause almost half of foids to dream about you raping them. Chads live in a different fucking world :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsseriously::feelsseriously::feelsseriously:
"91% were heterosexual" wrong secondly the dude's they are imagining are chad tier
 
Getting raped by Chad that is

But then again water is wet
 
Study: PDF: View attachment 1208918


In this study from 2009, 355 female undergraduates (college foids, not teenagers) participated in a study that surveyed if and how often they had rape fantasies. Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy, For women who have had rape fantasies, the median frequency of these fantasies was about 4 times per year, with 14%of participants reporting that they had rape fantasies at least once a week. Here are the details. (pay attention to the red underlined text like this, it contains blackpilling data.)

The women in the study:
  • 355 undergraduate women, from two universities in the united states.
  • 81% of the participants were between ages 18-21
  • 90% were single !!
  • 91% were heterosexual
  • 78% were christian
demographic:
  • 59% Caucasian-white
  • 16% African American black
  • 13% Hispanic-Latina
  • 6% Biracial
  • 5% Asian
  • 1% Native Indian
What’s crazy to me is that you could go to college in 2008 and find mostly christian, single, straight women on campus aged 18-21, must’ve been fun to be chad then, anyways.

procedure:​

View attachment 1208926

participants filled out a "Sexual fantasy checklist", then a "sexual fantasy log" where participants had to write a sexual fantasy that they had which involved sexual aggresion or sexual coercion against them. Then they were asked questions about the beginning, middle, and end of the fantasy, the description of the characters in the fantasy (oh boy) how they would rate the fantasy's sexual arousal on a scale of 0 to 4, how unconsenting they were in the fantasy, how attractive the perpetrator was, etc.

There was no misunderstanding about what qualified as rape, "rape fantasy" was described as:
  • the use of force or incapacitation against the will of the woman
  • resulting in vaginal, anal, or oral contact/penetration
  • regardless of sexual acts that may have taken place consensually

The results:​

View attachment 1208931

for the first question, "do you fantasize about being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against your will":
  • 48% said they don't
  • 17.2% said they fantasize once a year
  • 13.5% fantasized about it a few times a year
  • 10.4% fantasized about it EVERY MONTH
  • 5.9% fantasized about it once a WEEK
  • 4.5% fantasized about it four or five times a week
  • 0.3% fantasized about it several times a day.
in the sex fantasy logs, where women described the sexual fantasies they have had:
  • 63% of fantasies contained non-consensual vaginal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained non-consensual anal sex
  • 11% of fantasies contained hair-pulling
  • 22% of fantasies contained being pushed
  • 24% of fantasies contained the woman pushing the rapist/perpetrator away
  • 49% of fantasies were initially resistant, later willing
  • 12% of fantasies were initially willing, later resistant
  • 35% of fantasies were resistant throughout the entire fantasy
  • 46% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an ex-partner or current partner (remember 90% of participants were single)
  • 21% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as a stranger
  • 14% of fantasies imagined the perpetrator as an acquaintance
  • 50% of fantasies imagined vaginal intercourse being consensual at some point in the fantasy
  • 30% of fantasies contained consensual kissing at some point in the fantasy
  • 23% of fantasies contained non-consensual kissing in the fantasy
  • 38% of the women felt positive or glad to have the fantasy
  • 33% had negative and guilty feelings about the fantasy
  • 28% had both positive and negative feelings about the fantasy.
after collecting systematic data on the fantasies, the fantasies were studied in detail to look for overall patterns:


The aversive (unwanted) rape fantasies (9% of the fantasies) were usually brief in description, the other rape fantasies, the more erotic and "enjoyable" ones, were two to three times longer than the unwanted ones. The aversive fantasies had a "dark alley" pattern, the woman imagined a scene where they were attacked and raped while in a situation like walking alone to her car or sleeping alone in her apartment. In all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character’s expression of non-consent was genuine, and this is in sharp contrast to the erotic rape fantasies. In nearly all aversive rape fantasies, the self-character remained resistant throughout the fantasy, which again was more common in aversive than in erotic rape fantasies. In over half of aversive rape fantasies, the perpetrator was either a stranger or ‘‘faceless.’’ Although the perpetrator was a relative in 18% of aversive fantasies, the perpetrator was never a relative in the other two types of rape fantasy. The perpetrator in aversive fantasies was less attractive than the perpetrator in the other rape fantasies, and the only perpetrator motive identified in aversive rape fantasies was to hurt or degradethe self-character. here is an example of an aversive rape fantasy, with spelling errors corrected:

View attachment 1208938

The EROTIC fantasies (45% of the fantasies) had a pattern of a "not right now" scenario, where the consent was low and changed during the fantasy, the woman became excited at the idea of sex but expressed non-consent for reasons like fear of getting caught or not wanting sex with a forbidden partner (a friend's boyfriend) or so. In nearly half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in one-fifth, he was an acquaintance. The perpetrator in these fantasies was rated as highly physically attractive, more attractive than the perpetrator in the aversive rape fantasies. In nearly one half of the erotic rape fantasies, the perpetrator was perceived as being driven either by his physical or romantic attraction toward the woman.

here is an example. this is the MOST BRUTAL fucking example:

View attachment 1208939
what the fuck. did this foid just admit to dreaming about getting raped by a chad while she was in a relationship?. THEN ended up in a relationship with him? :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously:

The rest of the fantasies - the remaining 46% - were "erotic-aversive" fantasies. 80% of these fantasies contained genuine non-consent from the woman. A lot of them had the pattern of a "partner going too far". These rape fantasieswere a mixture of fear, excitement, and sexual arousal.They were both sexually arousing and somewhat unpleasant. In a large majority of erotic–aversive rape fantasies,the non-consent was real for the self-character. These fantasies showed a broad pattern of changes in consent. In nearly one half of these fantasies, the perpetrator was a partner or ex-partner; and in nearly one-fourth,the perpetrator was a stranger. The perpetrator in these fantasies was typically rated as moderately attractive. Here is an example:

View attachment 1208940

conclusion​

foids think about rape - 62% of them apparently. water is wet. But a lot of foids think about being raped by their ex, their friends boyfriend, a lot of them have EROTIC rape fantasies. if you randomly collect a few hundred of them, FORTY FIVE PERCENT, 45% !!!! will write down a fucking enjoyable rape fantasy about being fucked against their will by AN ATTRACTIVE CHAD, and have no negative feelings about it afterwards. another 46% of them will write about a CHADLITE or "moderately ttractive perpetrator" going too far and sticking it in their anus or some shit, making them feel excitied and unhappy. The rest will write about UNATTRACTIVE FACELESS INCELS FUCKING THEM.

moral of the story, respawn as a chad, and you can cause almost half of foids to dream about you raping them. Chads live in a different fucking world :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsseriously::feelsseriously::feelsseriously:
HEIL HITLER RÆPE THESE FUCKING SLUT MEET HOLES GOD DAMNNNN IT
 

Similar threads

beyondschizo
Replies
4
Views
265
Balding Subhuman
Balding Subhuman
Deep.Nest
Replies
16
Views
354
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
Rau Le Creuset
Replies
10
Views
268
Retardfuel
Retardfuel
lu.jones
Replies
38
Views
424
lu.jones
lu.jones

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top