
four1298
⚠️This User is a Registered Incel
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2023
- Posts
- 458
I'm against both tubal ligation and vasectomies - both should be banned, but it we're going to split hairs, I think vasectomies are better. Sometimes people have been given incentives to get vasectomies. Here's why there should be more vasectomies: Most women want children and therefore they wouldn't want to marry a man who has a vasectomy. Therefore men getting vasectomies reduces competition for women who want to raise children. Tubal ligation should still be illegal because we want women to reproduce. Indeed, the percentage of men who get vasectomies should be at least in the double digits. Of course, this would benefit men who want children. Now, we live in a feminist system where there's more tubal ligations than vasectomies. This benefits women who want children because there's less competition for men who want children. Tubal ligation reversal should be free and even incentivized. Some inmates have given reduced sentences to get vasectomies. This is a good idea. Also, women should be given reduced sentences to reverse their tubal ligations. In fact, there should perhaps even be something like baby bonuses(financial incentives) for women who revese their tubal ligations. There should also be something like baby bonuses given to men who sterilize themselves. These ideas would be like living in a country with a high female-to-male sex ratio. There's many ways to increase the ratio, and they can all be the law simultaneously.
Vasectomies are like tattoos. They just make you more unnattractive, but that's why we should encourage it. Tattoos should be encouraged for both sexes so that it reduces their SMV. When men get tattoos, competition for women is easier. When women get tattoos, their SMV is lower and their looksmatch is someone lower on the scale, which which might they might settle for less. People don't like tattoos as Lori Alexander says. I believe sometimes employers prefer employees to not be tattooed, which is a good thing because women working is unattractive. Also, if men struggle to get work, that just means it's easier for men who don't have tattoos to get work. The uglier the tattoos, the better.
We should support anything that reduces people's SMV like overeating (overweightedness). Indeed, fat is beautiful, men and women. Go ahead and lower your SMV. It's just better for us thin men!
Vasectomies are like tattoos. They just make you more unnattractive, but that's why we should encourage it. Tattoos should be encouraged for both sexes so that it reduces their SMV. When men get tattoos, competition for women is easier. When women get tattoos, their SMV is lower and their looksmatch is someone lower on the scale, which which might they might settle for less. People don't like tattoos as Lori Alexander says. I believe sometimes employers prefer employees to not be tattooed, which is a good thing because women working is unattractive. Also, if men struggle to get work, that just means it's easier for men who don't have tattoos to get work. The uglier the tattoos, the better.
We should support anything that reduces people's SMV like overeating (overweightedness). Indeed, fat is beautiful, men and women. Go ahead and lower your SMV. It's just better for us thin men!