Let's finally settle this, which is more important factor in getting women/determining a person's SMV, is it status or is it looks?
Just lol at not voting looks.
F
chads looks will fade eventually, while legends are never forgotten.
D
Looks gives you status by default with added benefits
status only works for insane status, like actor, ceo of big company, etc. For anyone making less than 250k, it's looks.
D
Their looks doesn't fade away as easily it can last until their 55+ and by then they will be having tons of money base on how the world treats beautiful looking people, everything is handed to them by default.
C
Looks unless we're talking A or B tier celebrity status.
F
i guess it depends on the status level, i was thinking celebs, actors, etc
Great looks equal auto status so looks.
The problem is that the relationship between those and reality isn't linear at all... above a certain level of looks status becomes more important, while below that level looks are everything
Tonnes of fucking ugly Musicians that get more pussy than Chad.
S
status in third world, looks in cuccworld
D
Actors,celebs are naturally good looking and are often the highest paid.
Just lol at fucking dani devito instead of CHAD
E
Looks, because you can always get a status being good looking.
Looks hands down.
Status as an ugly man just buys you 24/7 prostitutes.
Status as an ugly man just buys you 24/7 prostitutes.
Looks = status.
Although I'm a "society which allows for looks to dominate"-kinda guy, I had to say looks.
Even if high status can outdo looks, it's not as if most men can use their high status in society. Additionally, if somehow most men could use the "high status card", then it doesn't mean high status is gone. It just means the bar has been raised to an even higher status threshold.
For most, it's about looks (because we live in a society that allows looks to dominate) and it's what people will judge you by when they don't even know you. It's also what allows Chads to get away with the very same things that would have women call the police on had an incel do it.
Even if high status can outdo looks, it's not as if most men can use their high status in society. Additionally, if somehow most men could use the "high status card", then it doesn't mean high status is gone. It just means the bar has been raised to an even higher status threshold.
For most, it's about looks (because we live in a society that allows looks to dominate) and it's what people will judge you by when they don't even know you. It's also what allows Chads to get away with the very same things that would have women call the police on had an incel do it.
with looks the girl will genuinely love you but if you have status they won't really care about you. pussy is pussy though so who cares how you get it
Status by far, you could be ugly as fuck but if you have enough status foids will FLOCK to you and chase YOU.
You could be a 9/10 chad but you won't be pulling 9/10's unless you put in effort.
Status is fucking key, but the majority of people wont achieve it.
So in reality it's looks, unless you have some way of statusmaxing
You could be a 9/10 chad but you won't be pulling 9/10's unless you put in effort.
Status is fucking key, but the majority of people wont achieve it.
So in reality it's looks, unless you have some way of statusmaxing
looks. looks is the only attribute or set of attributes which trigger primal urges of foids. chads will have foids on their knees for them regardless of if they are homeless or famous actors.
status only appeals to foids for two reasons:
1. because it indicates that you are a winner and good looks indicates good genes which indicates winning the genetic lottery(the most important competition in life) so looks indicate that even more so than status.
2. so they can use it to their advantage like with money. in other words, for their own altruistic desires.
status only appeals to foids for two reasons:
1. because it indicates that you are a winner and good looks indicates good genes which indicates winning the genetic lottery(the most important competition in life) so looks indicate that even more so than status.
2. so they can use it to their advantage like with money. in other words, for their own altruistic desires.
Looks are more imortant, as made evident by the me too movement. Women chase high status men in the hopes of becoming famous or rich, not because they're sexually aroused such men.
High IQ poster
how is this even a question fam?
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
