Life, as we are often told, is not fair. This phrase is repeated so frequently that it has become a cliché, a way for soyciety to dismiss the struggles of those who feel marginalized or left behind. Yet, this same soyciety that preaches resilience and perseverance often fails to address the systemic inequalities and injustices that make life so unfair in the first place. This contradiction lies at the heart of what I see as soyciety’s hypocrisy towards life.
For many, including myself, the experience of feeling excluded or subjugated by soycietal structures can lead to profound feelings of despair. The term “Incel" has become a term of abuse for those who are alienated from romantic and social fulfillment, often due to factors beyond their control. While the term itself is controversial, the pain and frustration felt by those who identify with it are very real. Soyciety’s response to this pain, however, is often dismissive. Platitudes like “life isn’t fair, get over it” are not only unhelpful but also deeply alienating. If life is inherently unfair, why should anyone be expected to participate in it willingly? And if participation is mandatory, what does that say about the values of the soyciety we live in?
One possible answer lies in the way soyciety prioritizes productivity over well-being. From a young age, we are taught that our worth is tied to our ability to contribute economically - to work, pay taxes, and fulfill soycietal roles. This expectation is often framed as a moral obligation, but it rarely takes into account the emotional and psychological toll it takes on those who are excluded from the benefits of this system. For those who struggle to find meaning or connection in a world that seems indifferent to their suffering, the demand to “keep going” can feel like a cruel joke.
At the same time, soyciety's response to mental health struggles often feels contradictory. On one hand, there is a growing awareness of the importance of mental health, with campaigns encouraging people to seek help and speak openly about their struggles. On the other hand, those who express feelings of hopelessness or a desire to opt out of life are often met with judgment or dismissal. This inconsistency highlights a deeper issue: soyciety’s reluctance to address the root causes of suffering, preferring instead to treat the symptoms without challenging the systems that perpetuate inequality and alienation.
Ultimately, the question of whether life is worth living is a deeply personal one, and it cannot be answered by soycietal platitudes or expectations. What is needed is a more compassionate and nuanced understanding of the challenges faced by those who feel excluded or marginalized. Rather than dismissing their pain, soyciety should strive to create a world where fairness and opportunity are not just ideals, but realities. Until then, the hypocrisy of expecting people to participate in a system that fails them will continue to be a source of frustration and despair for many.
For many, including myself, the experience of feeling excluded or subjugated by soycietal structures can lead to profound feelings of despair. The term “Incel" has become a term of abuse for those who are alienated from romantic and social fulfillment, often due to factors beyond their control. While the term itself is controversial, the pain and frustration felt by those who identify with it are very real. Soyciety’s response to this pain, however, is often dismissive. Platitudes like “life isn’t fair, get over it” are not only unhelpful but also deeply alienating. If life is inherently unfair, why should anyone be expected to participate in it willingly? And if participation is mandatory, what does that say about the values of the soyciety we live in?
One possible answer lies in the way soyciety prioritizes productivity over well-being. From a young age, we are taught that our worth is tied to our ability to contribute economically - to work, pay taxes, and fulfill soycietal roles. This expectation is often framed as a moral obligation, but it rarely takes into account the emotional and psychological toll it takes on those who are excluded from the benefits of this system. For those who struggle to find meaning or connection in a world that seems indifferent to their suffering, the demand to “keep going” can feel like a cruel joke.
At the same time, soyciety's response to mental health struggles often feels contradictory. On one hand, there is a growing awareness of the importance of mental health, with campaigns encouraging people to seek help and speak openly about their struggles. On the other hand, those who express feelings of hopelessness or a desire to opt out of life are often met with judgment or dismissal. This inconsistency highlights a deeper issue: soyciety’s reluctance to address the root causes of suffering, preferring instead to treat the symptoms without challenging the systems that perpetuate inequality and alienation.
Ultimately, the question of whether life is worth living is a deeply personal one, and it cannot be answered by soycietal platitudes or expectations. What is needed is a more compassionate and nuanced understanding of the challenges faced by those who feel excluded or marginalized. Rather than dismissing their pain, soyciety should strive to create a world where fairness and opportunity are not just ideals, but realities. Until then, the hypocrisy of expecting people to participate in a system that fails them will continue to be a source of frustration and despair for many.
Last edited:
