Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Sour graping is one thing really pissing me off about incel communities

I

IncelGenocide

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Posts
842
Incels should just admit that we are STARVED for female attention and intimacy and would crawl a mile of broken glass with our dicks if it meant a loyal 6/10 Becky in the end.

But no...whenever incels see a cute girl doing something they don't like she is instantly "ugly" "4/10" "post wall" etc...when in reality she could be objectively attractive, but incels would never admit that, because it would mean admitting someone you can't have is living life way better than you. So much easier to discard them as ugly old roasties and what not. Same way as fatties are discarding hot Chad hunks saying they are "too muscular" or some lame shit like that when in reality that is coping mechanism to protect ego in form of extreme sour graping.
 
112039

Eyebrows too dark, 2/10 would not bang
 
Uncultured cunt is uncultured cunt
 
Their hatred clouds their judgment
 
projection by high T and low IQ male.


this is your example of a good looking female? you joking? the only thing i'd like to do that downright irritating face would be to punch it.
This is y u virgin.

You know she would want NOTHING to do with you so you prepare to "reject her first" by saying she is ugly.

Guys like you are VOLCEL
 
I wish I was attracted to landwhales, life would be much easier (at least in theory.)
 
Yup, I agree. I don't think those arguing against degeneracy would feel that way if they were Chad and had beautiful girls constantly begging to sleep with him.
 
This is y u virgin.

You know she would want NOTHING to do with you so you prepare to "reject her first" by saying she is ugly.

Guys like you are VOLCEL
you first say that no female would like to do nothing with me, then proceed to call me "voluntarily celibate". did you really not realise how stupid that is?

most people are spineless cuckolds who would bend over backwards for the tiniest amount of attention from a female, but not everyone.
 
this is your example of a good looking female? you joking? the only thing i'd like to do that downright irritating face would be to punch it.
Yes, she's good looking, probably in the top 15%. And all foids are irritating, that's why god invented hatefucking.

there's literally nothing wrong with trains
On :soy:reddit:soy: they'd say whoosh.
 
you first say that no female would like to do nothing with me, then proceed to call me "voluntarily celibate". did you really not realise how stupid that is?

most people are spineless cuckolds who would bend over backwards for the tiniest amount of attention from a female, but not everyone.
I did not say that. I told that THAT female would want nothing to do with you. An uglier, fatter, aboriginal amputee mother of 5 MIGHT want something to do with you. But you reject THAT level of female, which means you'd reject even uglier ones, which means...you are VOLCEL
 
Honestly the majority of women are average or below average looking, it's just that most men are so starved for sex and companionship they inflate the value of all women. If you look at women objectively, there are very few that meet the criteria of being very attractive. The majority of models and such don't even look attractive, they just have a high sex value with a large ass or big tits, which don't neccessarily make a woman attractive, seeing how they are fake 99% of the time, or have been modified in some way to make them more appealing to people who want to fuck them.
 
Honestly the majority of women are average or below average looking, it's just that most men are so starved for sex and companionship they inflate the value of all women.
Not really. If men want those women then those women objectively look good. There is still a difference between 4/10, 6/10 and 9/10 female. But incels will say 9/10 looks 7/10 and 6/10 looks 4/10 to cope.
 
Not really. If men want those women then those women objectively look good. There is still a difference between 4/10, 6/10 and 9/10 female. But incels will say 9/10 looks 7/10 and 6/10 looks 4/10 to cope.
possess a high amount of SMV, not "objectively look good". even the ugliest female has orbiters. this is because of their vagina, not because they "objectively look good", there is a difference. if we're really to be objective, the average male is more aesthetic than the average female due to their sharper features.
 
Id rather die than fuck a curry tbh
 
But incels will say 9/10 looks 7/10 and 6/10 looks 4/10 to cope.
But those aren't really 9/10 or 7/10, their looks values are artifically inflated to be those numbers. They usually just have very basic features that any women has, but they have popularity. I can find a famous 7/10, and then go to a big city and find 10 other women like her in an hour.
 
possess a high amount of SMV, not "objectively look good". even the ugliest female has orbiters. this is because of their vagina, not because they "objectively look good", there is a difference. if we're to be really objective, the average male is more aesthetic than the average female due to their sharper features.
lol, you are coping hard talking about "aesthetics" and avoiding dimorphism, which is most important when speaking about attraction to opposite sex. Both genders are attracted to dimorphism. Sharp features - male dimorphism. Soft features - female dimorphism. I know you knew this, but pretended not to to further your point. You can't be this dumb honestly.
 
I would crawl a mile of broken glass with my dick if it meant the extermination of humanity in the end
 
this is your example of a good looking female? you joking? the only thing i'd like to do that downright irritating face would be to punch it.
Just out of curiosity, what's the percentage of girls you're attracted to? (ages, let's say, 15-25)
What are your standards?
 
lol, you are coping hard talking about "aesthetics" and avoiding dimorphism, which is most important when speaking about attraction to opposite sex. Both genders are attracted to dimorphism. Sharp features - male dimorphism. Soft features - female dimorphism. I know you knew this, but pretended not to to further your point. You can't be this dumb honestly.
that's just your hormones controlling you like the mindless drone we all are, people like you especially. "looking good" is something completely different overall, and is completely objective, beyond that of "my dick gets hard to this female because i'm a male".
 
I would crawl a mile of broken glass with my dick if it meant the extermination of humanity in the end

Or let all the foids live and kill each other off.

Could you imagine how much more sex dogs would get without chad around?
 
Honestly the majority of women are average or below average looking

majority
below average

You need to rethink this. We make fun of foids for that kind of thing.
112044



If you look at women objectively, there are very few that meet the criteria of being very attractive.
There is no objective beauty. Her weight and height and eye color are objective. Beauty is subjective... it's just that sometimes the subjective opinion of the majority is that you're ugly.
 
that's just your hormones controlling you like the mindless drone we all are, people like you especially. "looking good" is something completely different overall, and is completely objective, beyond that of "my dick gets hard to this female because i'm a male".
Hormones are what make you find opposite sex dimorphism ATTRACTIVE. So hormones constitute what attraction in terms of dimorphism is in males/females. So your point is void.
 
Hormones are what make you find opposite sex dimorphism ATTRACTIVE. So hormones constitute what attraction in terms of dimorphism is in males/females. So your point is void.
anything human with a vagina is sexually attractive to a male, especially a particularly desperate specimen (incels). this does not in any way translate to "objectively good looking". if you disagree with it then we have very different definitions of it.
 
Hormones are what make you find opposite sex dimorphism ATTRACTIVE. So hormones constitute what attraction in terms of dimorphism is in males/females. So your point is void.
M-muh dimorphism
112045
112046
112047

112048
 
Girls are dumb, who wants to spend time listening to their mundane chatter? I have high standards, I like a woman who actually acts like woman. Used up roasties with bird brains and caked up makeup can take a hike. These “women” need to fall to the knees of men not the other way around, because they are inferior beings. Just the ER way.
 
Last edited:
Cool cherry pic, also the second skinny guy is EXTREMELY DIMORPHIC:
The gymcel looks LESS dimorphic in the face than the second guy. The waiter is "cute", but not "dead hot" like second guy.
You're cherrypicking dimorphism. Height, frame and muscle mass are also dimorphic.

Also:
Full beard
Jfl if you believe a beard is inherently attractive to foids just because it's a male feature. Its only role in attractiveness is masking a shitty lower third.
Jfl if you're worshiping testosterone.
Foids love pretty boys. That's why you don't see someone like The Rock starring in romantic comedies or 50 Shades of Grey or whatever.
 
Lol this is especially true when it comes to the topic of betabuxxing and cucks.
 
Their hatred clouds their judgment
Yeah, many people here are coping way too hard. It’s no wonder IT can make us look like fools so easily, some low IQcel is always running around spewing their poorly thought out ideas and opinions with little to no awareness on how things actually work
 

Similar threads

T
Replies
7
Views
543
ToBurble&Pine
ToBurble&Pine
Ahylic
Replies
15
Views
666
LWii
LWii
C
Replies
8
Views
1K
Suigin Trismegistus
Suigin Trismegistus

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top