When we speak of "the reality of the situation" or "this world is", I have thought about how these terms are used. When we say "its the reality of the situation" we think of the moment as it is occurring; though do not be fooled there is a context occurring during that moment, yes the person may see it as it is happening but their feelings and beliefs about it serves a different master. When one speaks of "this world is" say a moment of suffering "this world is cruel" but is that so? When we making a house we must have a blue print, looking from above the way the house will be designed, so to can any man who looks from outside himself can see the actions of others, we notice that even chess players must have foresight to see ahead the moves a man will make in advance; whether he can make his opponent act against his will or position his enemy into a fatal error that will cause his defeat. Hence, when someone says "this world is cruel" or "Its a dog eat, dog world", this is not so for if we could look from the third person position instead of the first, then we may see very clearly that the world we inhabit has answers not by any mystical means but by imagination and will.
