Blackpill Society talks down about insecurity but implicates that you should have it because of standards.

[Pinpoint]

Humanitarian liberalism has changed things up a bit. But in a sense it's a paradoxical situation where people are to be humanitarian, and insecur about them in a state of not being with the new PC religion.
In a catholic/ religious society it is implied you should be insecure because we are all born with an inherently unwanted condiiton.
In my opinion insecurities about the right things, like being ugly, or being worthless is HONORABLE/ spiritual health.

They imply insecurity is good if it leaves foids alone. When it makes things in society go by its norms.
Everything has a flipside.
Often people talk about everything in the ideal. But what should they say you should do if the common course they htink people deal with/ have normie platittude advice for has a flip side? Eventually down the line they will think it's better to be insecure because that is the ultimate STOP DROP AND FIX YOURSELF instinct.
Society is nice/ gentle but when enough things get flipsided they will essentially tell you (all but in name) to be insecure.

 

[Michael15651]

It's difficult to understand your threads but I always end up agreeing with you.

 

[Pinpoint]

It's difficult to understand your threads but I always end up agreeing with you.

Insecurity is a passive human trait because we constantly look for justification from others when we are constantly adapting.

I am saying that society thinks you should be insecure if you have enough flipsides in situations where you are not enough.
It's changed with humanitarian liberalism, but not by much.
People think it's good for a beta to be anxious if girls don't generally want him.