Hypocrisy Socialists

[Pence2024]

Why is it always the people who endorse redistribution of wealth who want Chads to end up with harems of foids while most men are alone? If they care so much about equality, then they should support monogamy being the norm. That way everyone would hypothetically be able to find someone.

But they refuse to see the similarities between money and companionship. In fact, it makes more sense to limit the number of partners someone has than to limit the amount of wealth they have. Because with money, one person having more doesn't necessarily mean someone else has less. But with people, one person having two girlfriends DOES mean another guy has no girlfriend.

My logic is so sound that when I make this argument, the only response bluepillers can come up with is "Women aren't property!" But they sure do treat themselves like property. Just another reason liberals are full of crap.

 

[Reprobus]

"Women aren't property!"

Jfl to think these are the people we argue against. I’d neck myself if I woke up like this

 

[BummerDrummerOG]

Socialism can’t happen unless it’s national socialism. How can you thrive on a system that is constantly taking in unskilled poor people and paying for them?

 

[your personality]

Let me translate this for those interested:

We [the left] don't care if you are emotionally starved for affection. That is not our problem nor our concern. Our concern is with the redistribution of resources to help ourselves and people like us. We don't care about the increasingly larger and larger number of lonely and desperate males that have no familial prospects. These males don't matter and will be destroyed if they attempt to right the imbalance in the sexual marketplace we have created.

We can seize the means of production to support millions of single mothers and their reproductive choices, but we can't compel the females in society to accept their looksmatch. We must cater to irrational female needs. We will force YOU to pay for us but YOU can't force us to provide you with a basic psychological need.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Socialism can’t happen unless it’s national socialism. How can you thrive on a system that is constantly taking in unskilled poor people and paying for them?

Internationalism socialism can work if there is one world government, thus it becomes one nation. But it will be a shit hole just like socialism at a national scale.

 

[Deleted member 17889]

Socialism can’t happen unless it’s national socialism. How can you thrive on a system that is constantly taking in unskilled poor people and paying for them?

 

[BummerDrummerOG]

Internationalism socialism can work if there is one world government, thus it becomes one nation. But it will be a shit hole just like socialism at a national scale.

No because the world government has multiple races. It would just collapse in on itself because you want the darkest nigger in apefrica and the whitest cracker in Norway to somehow treat eachother the same with no barriers. Not to mention the massive erosion of culture and heritage brought about by unification of the world. Instant shithole, like this world but x100 because the agenda is at the end of the day complete globalization

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

No because the world government has multiple races. It would just collapse in on itself because you want the darkest nigger in apefrica and the whitest cracker in Norway to somehow treat eachother the same with no barriers. Not to mention the massive erosion of culture and heritage brought about by unification of the world. Instant shithole, like this world but x100 because the agenda is at the end of the day complete globalization

True, there would be cultural conflict, which is why the world might eventually become one culture naturally through consumerism and the internet. It might become an economic success but it will become something the human spirit won't tolerate because we want to feel part of a tribe. It's also why people are already depressed in cities, mouse utopian experiment pill.

 

[BummerDrummerOG]

True, there would be cultural conflict, which is why the world might eventually become one culture naturally through consumerism and the internet. It might become an economic success but it will become something the human spirit won't tolerate because we want to feel part of a tribe. It's also why people are already depressed in cities, mouse utopian experiment pill.

The agenda is to have the world become one culture under a ruling elite. One “culture” (blind consumerism) one race no heritage no history no tradition.

 

[slavcel11]

they are materialists who only care about figures. As long as everyone has equally low wages they're fine with it.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

The agenda is to have the world become one culture under a ruling elite. One “culture” (blind consumerism) one race no heritage no history no tradition.

well eventually people will evolve and they won't be recognizable anyways, like how we went from monkey to human. I think genetic engineering will come in before this happens and race won't have much of meaning anymore, as we will see 7 foot tall perfect gigachads with 10000IQ. But yeah, preserving cultures and traditions is important because it shows people that there isn't just one way to live.I think even more than the ruling elite, the AI will take over as elites because they are far smarter than people, and they eventually won't be able to be controlled by humans.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

I hate social marxists

 

[LittleDarkAge]

Yes, it's a bizarre dichotomy that has been noted on this forum before. Foids and soycucks are socialists when it comes to money but brutal capitalists in terms of the sexual market. Any sane society should be the other way around

 

[watcher]

Women and their simp dogs are socialists about the money but capitalists about sex

 

[ElliotRodgerGod]

Maybe there is always supposed to be a certain amount of inequality when it comes to gender relations, for example, we used to have unequal rights for women but we had a relatively equal sexual marketplace. Most women were happier when they had unequal rights and were caregivers for their children rather than career women.

Now, both men and women have equal rights (or rather women have more rights) but the inequality has shifted to the sexual marketplace. The big difference here is that while women were happy with being unequal, most men aren't happy that they can't get pussy. Obviously this leads for disastrous effects for society. As an example, the hikikomori men in Japan are the byproduct of this sexual inequality, and are a huge issue for Japanese politicians as the elderly population is dying off.

 

[PersonaPimp]

soycialists aren't the same of real and old socialists

there is a big difference between the old and the new left

 

[PM_ME_STRIPPERS]

the only reason why they dont support this is because of feminist propaganda, and bs progressive push agenda

 

[VindalooCell]

Most socialists you see online are not really so and are in reality just bourgeoise entertaining their revolutionary fantasies. Look at Vaush for example, he makes a lot of money from streaming inane content and his "socialist" fanbase lap it up massively.

Socialism today is concerned with all sorts of weird issues.

 

[your personality]

Most socialists you see online are not really so and are in reality just bourgeoise entertaining their revolutionary fantasies. Look at Vaush for example, he makes a lot of money from streaming inane content and his "socialist" fanbase lap it up massively.

Don't trust anything youtube 'content creators' say they're pretty much only in it for the money and notoriety tbh

Socialism today is concerned with all sorts of weird issues.

Identity politics and redistribution policies to help women, POC (black people and latino people mostly) and transgender people.

 

[pixy.]

Socialism can’t happen unless it’s national socialism

 

[mNFwTJ3wz9]

we will see 7 foot tall perfect gigachads with 10000IQ.

You really think people are selecting for IQ?

 

[your personality]

You really think people are selecting for IQ?

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

You really think people are selecting for IQ?

they aren't, but people will still want to give high iq to their kids

 

[mNFwTJ3wz9]

they aren't, but people will still want to give high iq to their kids

Iq will not happen.

It will be called unethical to do genetic engineering that affects the brain.
The foids having kids would rather select empathetic and feminised tall males if they choose to have males at all.
People won't really get a choice on the specifics of genetic engineering, they will just take what they can get.
IQ genes will not be invested in by anyone. Any companies looking for those will go (((out of business))).

It is already happening btw:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vmHweDC5SY

(((Authorities))) restricting use

https://www.youtube.com/c/thethoughtemporium/videos

this guy in one of his streams has said that the only reason that gene editing is not easier is because chemicals are regulated.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

> liberals; they are radlibs, that's where the problem lies.

You can't accuse others of commodifying people, if you commidify yourself and basic human needs in the first place.

Also where is the difference of a capitalist taking the surplus value of a worker's work and a whore taking it through unequal pay? Worker makes 30€ Whore 60€. That's 30€ stolen in my book.

Because with money, one person having more doesn't necessarily mean someone else has less.
It does though. The total amount of money in the system is a proxy for the value of all available goods and services. If someone has more money it lowers the value of other peoplee ones. Also the rich use the money to control everything (the worker via extortion (threat of starvation or social destruction) ,the media, think tanks, corrupt politicians, lobbyists, parties through donation, the education system, the propaganda in our entertainment). To much income equalitx shifts the balance of power towards the rich.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Iq will not happen.

It will be called unethical to do genetic engineering that affects the brain.
The foids having kids would rather select empathetic and feminised tall males if they choose to have males at all.
People won't really get a choice on the specifics of genetic engineering, they will just take what they can get.
IQ genes will not be invested in by anyone. Any companies looking for those will go (((out of business))).

It is already happening btw:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vmHweDC5SY

(((Authorities))) restricting use

https://www.youtube.com/c/thethoughtemporium/videos

this guy in one of his streams has said that the only reason that gene editing is not easier is because chemicals are regulated.

Maybe in America, but China will definately invest in high iq super soldiers. If burderland refuses to do so, they will be wiped out eventually.

 

[Trump2020]

Socialists are NPC garbage. Don't expect any rational thought from them.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

Some more thoughts.

I think the main problem is the matter of perspective only a person who went through poverty or being ugly actually understands the processes and odds behind it and even then that is not a guarantee. Liberalism's individualism has taught the people to blame themselves for external systemic failures and outright obfuscates reality either actively or passively through natural market intransparencies. All this for the purpose to keep the sharade up that we are a meritocracy and that people who don't make it chose to do so or are of bad virtue.

If the problem it external it means it would necessitate financial commitment to fix it. It is more convenient for the rich (in looks or money) to scapegoat the individual instead.

The side effect is, that people fail to see how they are biologically largely part of a group with the same needs and programming. Everyone is a special snowflake. Your consoom "choices" show how distinct your personality is (in reality merely proxy actions for animalistic needs with neglectable differences following predictable schemata). You like men with a strong jaw and of huge build, but maybe with red hair? "Teeheee, it is just my individual taste." Do they actually believe this bs despite obvious data? Well cognitive dissonance and the tendency to bend reality to fit our own interest is deeply imbodied in the human mind. A person pumped full with propaganda, who won't study the topic with an open mind and heart or is not personally affected will never get it....