Blackpill Socialdarwinism is based

[PillarofReality]

Nature knows only struggle and the survival of the stronger. In our modern, softened soyciety, weakness is praised as a virtue, while true strength is despised. They want to turn us into a uniform herd, where everyone is equal, and no one wants to lead or follow anymore.

However, this weakness is unnatural. In nature, only the strong have the right to life and reproduction. The fight between two beings determines who is superior—in looks, strength, intelligence and assertiveness. The loser must settle for the leftovers.

The prevailing morality of pity destroys the natural order. It turns weakness into a virtue and seeks to undo the achievements of the strong. We must resist this. What we need is a return to genuine virtues—not in the moral sense, but in terms of competence, skill, and achievement.

Humans are not equal and never will be. No amount of investment in education will change that. Nature knows no equality. It knows only the eternal struggle, from which the stronger emerges victorious.

 

[wereq]

Slave morality will die, the consequences of whose policies for the last 200 to 500 years or more have been disastrous for the human race due massive explosion of subhumanity, and in its place will birth a radical new order based upon master morality, social darwinism, biological determinism, eugenics, militarism, authoritarianism, and punitive justice.

However, this weakness is unnatural. In nature, only the strong have the right to life and reproduction. The fight between two beings determines who is superior—in looks, strength, intelligence and assertiveness. The loser must settle for the leftovers.

Weakness is most unnatural and undesirable but since we managed to subvert nature in the aftermath of the industrial revolution and agricultural revolution, we now are left to deal with massive explosions of subhuman scum who can't do what is needed to maintain and improve society.

 

[wereq]

Civilization's population cycles work just like boom bust cycles in finance and economy.

During times of boom, money is cheap and optimism is high. Everything is going well and people are flourishing. Good times make everything easy to accomplish because pressures of existence are low which allows subhumans to thrive spread their genetics. In the post WW2 period until very recently...

incels.is

How do you deal with the fact that God/nature is against you and wants to purge you from the system?

Our existence as genetic rejects is against the order of nature which constantly seeks to purge us since in nature's eyes we are incompetent and unworthy. It feels like a losing game fighting against our fated impending doom. What do you think? Should we continue to fight everyday against the...

incels.is

 

[PureImagination]

Socialdarwinism would be only good for you if you’re the strongest yourself, we would all be dead or slaves if social Darwinism would dominate soyciety

 

[wereq]

we would all be dead or slaves if social Darwinism would dominate soyciety

That time is nearing. Society can no longer support so many subhumans.

Civilization's population cycles work just like boom bust cycles in finance and economy.

During times of boom, money is cheap and optimism is high. Everything is going well and people are flourishing. Good times make everything easy to accomplish because pressures of existence are low which allows subhumans to thrive spread their genetics. In the post WW2 period until very recently...

incels.is

 

[I want to believe]

SociaLDARwinism

 

[chudjak]

However, this weakness is unnatural. In nature, only the strong have the right to life and reproduction. The fight between two beings determines who is superior—in looks, strength, intelligence and assertiveness. The loser must settle for the leftovers.

This is literally still true with men and we are the losers brah

 

[Friezacel]

Its survival of the fittest and not the strongest, its an important difference. But yeah

 

[lazy_gamer_423]

but they teach you in school that social darwinism is bad

 

[cockroach]

Fuck nature honestly

 

[Only_Perspective]

In nature, only the strong have the right to life and reproduction. The fight between two beings determines who is superior—in looks, strength, intelligence and assertiveness. The loser must settle for the leftovers

It's based only if you're chadscum, if you're an incel it sucks and anyone who praises it sounds like a cuck.

 

[Ryo_Hazuki]

However, this weakness is unnatural. In nature, only the strong have the right to life and reproduction. The fight between two beings determines who is superior—in looks, strength, intelligence and assertiveness.

There's so many things wrong with this logic I don't know where to start.

1) A fight between two men doesn't mean shit about who is better looking or higher IQ. An ugly sub4 high T ogre could starch a high IQ skinny pretty boy in a fight with ease, that just means he's better at hand to hand combat.

2) Returning to our primal instincts to fight each other to attract a mate is incompatible with having a functional civilization. If men are busy fighting each other, they're not going to build, invent, innovate or maintain the various thing that need to be constantly maintained in a basic postindustrial civilization. And regardless of what you think, if you were put in a situation where you couldn't use the internet, indoor plumbing, electronics, air conditioning, heating, etc. for just a month you would go insane.

3) Returning to our brutal instincts with the technology we have now wouldn't even prove who is braver or stronger. A weak coward can easily kill a strong brave man by shooting him in the back of the head or poisoning his food.

 

[DarkStar]

In the modern day, weakness is praised as a virtue, alongside being a degenerate.

Most simply do not recognize that we're being raised in a society which has been socially engineered for us to exist in this state in which we are by default, fit to be "culled" when it comes down to it.