Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment So I did the MENSA online test.

Moroccancel

Moroccancel

يا حبيبتي٫ يا مستحيلي
★★★★★
Joined
May 18, 2023
Posts
13,102
Under the challenge of @Regressive I decided to take an IQ test, I had my IQ tested at school when I was younger and got a score of 100. @Regressive He challenged me to do a second test and so I did with the utmost concentration and according to my possibilities: 108 at mensa.dk/iqtest/


Screenshot 20240922 140634


That's what It is.
 
Gggpture
u challenged me by saying i have low iq
u know how egoist satan is eh fuckin niggro hahaha
 
@MENSA_IQcel mogs hard
 
Those tests are not accurate. I never took one though
 
View attachment 1272935 u challenged me by saying i have low iq
u know how egoist satan is eh fuckin niggro hahaha
No, that's what you said. I said your last two neurons were about to collapse.

And it's true. Your spatial vision is enough to keep you from shitting yourself.

Plus I know my results are fair. How I know yours is not HTML-edited?
 
View attachment 1272935 u challenged me by saying i have low iq
u know how egoist satan is eh fuckin niggro hahaha
Just goes to show how inaccurate those tests are. You don't seem to be too bright from my observations. Someone like @GeckoBus gets a 80 score and someone like you 123, fucking how?
 
No, that's what you said. I said your last two neurons were about to collapse.

And it's true. Your spatial vision is enough to keep you from shitting yourself.
i dont have two neurons...that clearly implies i am stupid

thats just one representation of iq
what else u want..musical, logical, linguistic, physical, existential just name it nigga
 
Just goes to show how inaccurate those tests are. You don't seem to be too bright from my observations. Someone like @GeckoBus gets a 80 score and someone like you 123, fucking how?
average coper
i ranked fourth in national MA entrance exam u faggot
 
i dont have two neurons...that clearly implies i am stupid

thats just one representation of iq
what else u want..musical, logical, linguistic, physical, existential just name it nigga
Autistic motherfucker.
 
Just goes to show how inaccurate those tests are. You don't seem to be too bright from my observations. Someone like @GeckoBus gets a 80 score and someone like you 123, fucking how?
geckobus might possess knowledge and wisdom but it by no means reflects his aptitude for matrix puzzles. you guys need to acknowledge nuance
 
Just goes to show how inaccurate those tests are. You don't seem to be too bright from my observations. Someone like @GeckoBus gets a 80 score and someone like you 123, fucking how?
My theory IS that he HTML'd his shit, or that spatial vision is not enough to counter-measure autism.
 
Anyone who scores below 130 is a subhuman
 
youd rope if u knew what i said
I care so little that I'm not going to use the translator to translate a language that sounds like having permanent phlegm in your throat.
 
Under the challenge of @Regressive I decided to take an IQ test, I had my IQ tested at school when I was younger and got a score of 100. @Regressive He challenged me to do a second test and so I did with the utmost concentration and according to my possibilities: 108 at mensa.dk/iqtest/


View attachment 1272933

That's what It is.
Impressive
 
Yeah and, I would probably be on the top of my class too in Iran
wtf r u trying to prove fuckin niggro?
this debate concerns me n the sexhaver OP
im not saying im smart..i say he cant call me low iq n get away with it
 
I care so little that I'm not going to use the translator to translate a language that sounds like having permanent phlegm in your throat.
KHKHKHKHKKHH
arab niggers GHGHGHGHGHGHGHغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغ i hope u choked
 
wtf r u trying to prove fuckin niggro?
this debate concerns me n the sexhaver OP
im not saying im smart..i say he cant call me low iq n get away with it
No one called you low IQ, But it's clear that your autism doesn't let you get out of the same pattern of thinking because you assume certain variables as true.

If paying a whore is being a fakecel The conclusion is that every man is a volcel, This, apart from being false, is a normie argument to delegitimize incel men because they are told that by paying they will get out of their condition, while what is called "inceldom" is the inability to attract a genuinely for specifically phenotypic reasons.
 
KHKHKHKHKKHH
arab niggers GHGHGHGHGHGHGHغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغغ i hope u choked
You have to face it, Arabic is superior in every way to a language that sounds the same as Hebrew. You Iranians are so jealous of Arabic that you had to create your own version of Islam to avoid the humiliation of being conquered and dominated for centuries by Arabs.
 
No one called you low IQ, But it's clear that your autism doesn't let you get out of the same pattern of thinking because you assume certain variables as true.

If paying a whore is being a fakecel The conclusion is that every man is a volcel, This, apart from being false, is a normie argument to delegitimize incel men because they are told that by paying they will get out of their condition, while what is called "inceldom" is the inability to attract a genuinely for specifically phenotypic reasons.
u make conclusion and draw implications well when it comes to your own arguments....what u said to me did imply low iq
how about this conclusion: every foid has been fucked, so u fuckin any foid even if not escort makes u a cuck therefore u better be volcel.thats my conclusion (banpill again)

inceldom is not equal to uglyness...thats one of its causes but not always....inceldom is being touchless due to any reason except religion
i am not saying if a sub 5 fucks escort he is a chad automatically....but he is clearly a sexhaver and not an incel...he is still ugly but not incel cuz he voluntarily paid a sieve (simp and stupid n non touchless therefore not blackpilled nor incel)
he can fuck 1000 escorts and u will still call him incel
while a mentally fucked nigga who is facially ok but touchless is not incel to u..he actually suffers more...he knows he can get laid but cant due to mental issues he has but you too biased towards lookism (im not denying it but trying to complement it with ntpil/contextpill lets say) that cant understand it making him alien even on an incel forum made for just him n no sexhaver faggot
 
You have to face it, Arabic is superior in every way to a language that sounds the same as Hebrew. You Iranians are so jealous of Arabic that you had to create your own version of Islam to avoid the humiliation of being conquered and dominated for centuries by Arabs.
ok lizard eater
 
u make conclusion and draw implications well when it comes to your own arguments....what u said to me did imply low iq
how about this conclusion: every foid has been fucked, so u fuckin any foid even if not escort makes u a cuck therefore u better be volcel.thats my conclusion (banpill again)
Premise 1: Every foid has had sex.
Premise 2: Having sex with a woman who has had previous sexual partners makes a man a cuck.
Conclusion: Therefore, any man who has sex with a woman, unless she’s an escort, is a cuck, and it's better to be a volcel.

This makes all men cucks, including Chads, because the supply of virgins is extremely small, even for Chad's sights and scopes, which is a fallacy and a change in the definition of what a "cuck" is, by definition.

So, you and I start from opposing definitions of what inceldom is. In fact, your definition contradicts the foundations of what this forum is and what is by consensus called "inceldom"

Incels.is is a community for men that struggle with or are unable to get into romantic relationships with women despite trying. We welcome men from all walks of life, and from all cultural and racial backgrounds, as long as you are an incel.

Likewise and therefore, your definition is sectarian, bluepilled and alienated with normie thinking.
inceldom is not equal to uglyness...thats one of its causes but not always....inceldom is being touchless due to any reason except religion
Inceldom is not equal to ugliness but it is causal of ugliness in most cases which could be stated as a probabilistic model; Likewise genuine sexual success and failure could be measured by a probabilistic model where the variables would be the pills that can be measured objectively, such as height, BMI, facial structure (proportionality, shape of eyes, nose...). As you know, every statistical model has exceptions, but living off exceptions is a very typical argument of normiespeak.
he can fuck 1000 escorts and u will still call him incel
while a mentally fucked nigga who is facially ok but touchless is not incel to u..he actually suffers more...he knows he can get laid but cant due to mental issues he has but you too biased towards lookism (im not denying it but trying to complement it with ntpil/contextpill lets say) that cant understand it making him alien even on an incel forum made for just him n no sexhaver faggot
Yes, I would still call him an incel because what allows him to have sex is his economic capacity, and not the genuine attraction of a foid for him, the ability to form a couple, getting laid, lately, reproduce as a whole, in families.

"Facially ok" is normiedom and in countries like ours it is impossible to be normie and incel because you only need to accumulate money to get married. Something that doesn't work with trucels like me who, despite having the money, are rejected by all the families and foids.

The NTPill is a cope, and the more beautiful the person is, the less everything else matters, as with any other pill, context is independent of beauty because context would only restrict access, such as extremely religious societies, but does not deny that lookism is the main and most basic variable of inceldom and the one that most conditions it.

With the pussy inflation in the West, I buy your argument that many normies are potential incels or simply betabuxx who don't last more than a few months in a relationship when they finally end up as cucks, But that is the dynamic in which women are free: dynamics that are never seen in the history of civilizations except in tribal societies (almost all dominated by superior civilizations) and today, where it is resulting in the gradual extinction of societies or racemixxing inbreeding. But the normie still has access to genuine sex, without paying, something that does not happen to the man who is authentically incel.

For this reason, we cannot agree and why I believe that you are still highly influenced by the bluepill under erroneous variables that you avidly defend with a somewhat particular autism.
 
This makes all men cucks, including Chads, because the supply of virgins is extremely small, even for Chad's sights and scopes, which is a fallacy and a change in the definition of what a "cuck" is, by definition.
i guess all leftover fucker men are cuck then...lets not debate on this side issue
Inceldom is not equal to ugliness but it is causal of ugliness in most cases which could be stated as a probabilistic model; Likewise genuine sexual success and failure could be measured by a probabilistic model where the variables would be the pills that can be measured objectively, such as height, BMI, facial structure (proportionality, shape of eyes, nose...). As you know, every statistical model has exceptions, but living off exceptions is a very typical argument of normiespeak.
u put all the variables there except mental-related stuff as if they have no effect n ive seen enough examples to know its not so....being all good looking isnt always getting u sex automatically everywhere in the world regardless of culture/context. but yeah it does increase the probability of your ascension n may have more prediction power than mental sides...as u said, "most cases" it is uglyness not always..i thought we discussing escortmaxxers tho..they ahve enough ntpill to fuck an escort while i dont wtf u gonna do about it
Yes, I would still call him an incel because what allows him to have sex is his economic capacity, and not the genuine attraction of a foid for him, the ability to form a couple, getting laid, lately, reproduce as a whole, in families.
ok money is important but why dont acknowledge also being normal to some extreme degrees? specially if u do it regularly....u need much confidence n know-hows to be able to approach, ask, and fuck an escort...anyway if u blackpilled n know foids nature u will be stupidly trying to cheat nature n then come here to nag muh foids bad muh im incel
"Facially ok" is normiedom and in countries like ours it is impossible to be normie and incel because you only need to accumulate money to get married. Something that doesn't work with trucels like me who, despite having the money, are rejected by all the families and foids.
that will not automatically get u sex here at least
The NTPill is a cope, and the more beautiful the person is, the less everything else matters, as with any other pill, context is independent of beauty because context would only restrict access, such as extremely religious societies, but does not deny that lookism is the main and most basic variable of inceldom and the one that most conditions it.
i dont question lookism but say a normie/chadlite who can pull a gf but cant due to mental issues exists..plenty of them i can say
something that does not happen to the man who is authentically incel.
i am not denying it...my problem was just with escortmaxxers....i dont care if its paid or if foid isnt attracted to him...first of all he knew these but chose voluntarily to pay and fuck.....neither involuntarily nor celibate.....do u put a touchless and a person with 1000 sexes with escorts in the same group/forum? just hypothetically
For this reason, we cannot agree and why I believe that you are still highly influenced by the bluepill under erroneous variables that you avidly defend with a somewhat particular autism.
ntpill was much more accepted before as i recall...infiltrators like u would be banned but u got the forum now in your filthy hands
 
the moroccan is in sweden how surprising
 
mensa.dk/iqtest
Under the challenge of @Regressive I decided to take an IQ test, I had my IQ tested at school when I was younger and got a score of 100. @Regressive He challenged me to do a second test and so I did with the utmost concentration and according to my possibilities: 108 at mensa.dk/iqtest/


View attachment 1272933

That's what It is.
108 isnt bad why are u sperging so hard in the thread
 
i guess all leftover fucker men are cuck then...lets not debate on this side issue
There are not enough virgins for anyone, not even Chad, who will, nevertheless, and as a result, only have to choose from foids that have had low body account. It is an unquestionable statistical phenomenon.
u put all the variables there except mental-related stuff as if they have no effect n ive seen enough examples to know its not so....being all good looking isnt always getting u sex automatically everywhere in the world regardless of culture/context. but yeah it does increase the probability of your ascension n may have more prediction power than mental sides...as u said, "most cases" it is uglyness not always..i thought we discussing escortmaxxers tho..they ahve enough ntpill to fuck an escort while i dont wtf u gonna do about it
The greater the beauty, the greater the sexual capacity and where the rest of the variables are irrelevant.

Being good looking will give you the most chances to have access to the sexual market in most places on the planet, because it is in most of the planet where sex is liberalized, either openly or through hypocritical methods and specific places where the market is given.

Talking about exceptions, minorities and large statistical deviations is of no use. You end up stating the bluepill that "I know ugly men who are married and have children and I see them constantly", which is false.

You can do whatever you want, But that's your problem, not that one thing determines the other.
ok money is important but why dont acknowledge also being normal to some extreme degrees? specially if u do it regularly....u need much confidence n know-hows to be able to approach, ask, and fuck an escort...anyway if u blackpilled n know foids nature u will be stupidly trying to cheat nature n then come here to nag muh foids bad muh im incel

Most people are normal, even among incels, most are normal; many have traumas, and in the end, due to pure behaviorism, they end up having certain vital predispositions, but it's all because of the effect of how society treats them, and not because of some kind of autism-cognitive delay-impairment that is widespread among the majority or that having good looks or an average appearance will automatically make you an incel. That, is statistically false, generally unlikely and a blatant cope.

There are countries where it is more complicated, I'm not going to lie to you, But, that is already fear of the consequences, or laziness due to the difficulty that being low or high inhib.

Cheating nature? Our entire civilization is based on cheating nature. And even more so in these times. Prostitution has existed since the dawn of civilization, We are now witnessing a time when women are free thanks to contraceptive methods and legal freedom in most countries. Nature is merciless if we lived by it, and that is the opposition to living by its rules: civilization, so the more we live as natural beings, animals, the greater the social and demographic collapse.


that will not automatically get u sex here at least
We come back to the same thing. Normies usually have to betabuxx to access sex, because of their own looks, but incels don't, because they can always access sex through these means, through marriage.or in the West, through courtship. Chad, in any civilization and context, will fuck and get fed up with fucking if he wants to.


i am not denying it...my problem was just with escortmaxxers....i dont care if its paid or if foid isnt attracted to him...first of all he knew these but chose voluntarily to pay and fuck.....neither involuntarily nor celibate.....do u put a touchless and a person with 1000 sexes with escorts in the same group/forum? just hypothetically
Yes, because the I variables, of Incel, It doesn't equal total sex that you've paid for but genuine sex that you've had without paying and where the foid feels lust for you. We start from different definitions and yours is wrong because in any case, it ends up in the fallacy that making a monetary transaction frees you from your inceldom, but does not free you from inceldom itself: your inherent inability to be sexually chosen by a foid to reproduce (i.e. the sexual act, because the sexual act is reproductive, even if it is biological consequences are capped).
ntpill was much more accepted before as i recall...infiltrators like u would be banned but u got the forum now in your filthy hands
I have here since 2022, counting my first account, known by mods. You just registered in 2024, and you are talking about infiltrators When you throw out the most bluepill arguments about what inceldom is and that if you pay to fuck a lot you're no longer an incel: normiespeak and many times, you sound really stupid in much of what you say, as most of the forum agrees.

The forum is full of experiences with escortmaxxing, in fact, since it was founded. The difference between one and the other is that one thing is boasting and another very different one is: I am a lonely man and I turn to foids under a transaction to supply that need.

It is concluded, again, that the ability to pay for sex does not make you the owner of sex, but rather its renter.
 
There are not enough virgins for anyone, not even Chad, who will, nevertheless, and as a result, only have to choose from foids that have had low body account. It is an unquestionable statistical phenomenon.
ok they r chads cuz they dont pay but still i consider nonvirgin fuckers less of a chad than a real chad that only fucks and dumps virgins (if such a chad exists..we r theorizing)
Talking about exceptions, minorities and large statistical deviations is of no use. You end up stating the bluepill that "I know ugly men who are married and have children and I see them constantly", which is false.
marrying is not a point....the question is who fucks (and dumps) more: 1/10 moneymaxxer with a harem or a 10/10 virgin? hahahaha

There are countries where it is more complicated,
like mine...we dont have to restrict our debate to western cultures i dont know wtf is happening there with all those giga degenerate toilets...i am limited to my own experiences here in my own context/culture////here ntpill IS necessarily if u wanna get laid or u just rot in the house all days n no one comes to give u pussy, naturally
Cheating nature? Our entire civilization is based on cheating nature. And even more so in these times. Prostitution has existed since the dawn of civilization, We are now witnessing a time when women are free thanks to contraceptive methods and legal freedom in most countries. Nature is merciless if we lived by it, and that is the opposition to living by its rules: civilization, so the more we live as natural beings, animals, the greater the social and demographic collapse.
10/10 wont cheat nature...foids wanna fuck him n he is not mogged by anyone so he has the right to fuck all foids being ultimate superior whereas a 1/10 cheats nature by moneymaxxing and escortmaxxing
if he wants to.
if he is NT is what u mean..wanting alone isnt enough he needs action too and for the action mentality must be correct n normal
Yes, because the I variables, of Incel, It doesn't equal total sex that you've paid for but genuine sex that you've had without paying and where the foid feels lust for you. We start from different definitions and yours is wrong because in any case, it ends up in the fallacy that making a monetary transaction frees you from your inceldom, but does not free you from inceldom itself: your inherent inability to be sexually chosen by a foid to reproduce (i.e. the sexual act, because the sexual act is reproductive, even if it is biological consequences are capped).
i dont say it breaks you free from inceldom,,,but you will simply not be incel..u just an ugly sexhaver who voluntarily broke your celibacy...."sexhaver incel" is an oxymoron how tf is my definition wrong its not even my definition its what it is in the book: incel = CANT get sex
anyway, if u know escortmaxxing wont fix u u shouldnt do it n betray nature as i said cuz it makes u stupid and simp asf,,,do u like fools and simps around here? of course u do
the implication of your argument is this: a 1/10 ugly moneymaxxer fucking (not celibate) 1000 escorts by paying them (voluntarily) = incel.....virgin (celibate) mentally fucked (involuntarily causes) touchless = non incel
I have here since 2022, counting my first account, known by mods. You just registered in 2024, and you are talking about infiltrators When you throw out the most bluepill arguments about what inceldom is and that if you pay to fuck a lot you're no longer an incel: normiespeak and many times, you sound really stupid in much of what you say, as most of the forum agrees.
if join date matters i will prove i was here before u....
thats fine, niggas here hate a touchless and nag about normies hating lonely/incel men....here has its own "norm" which u have to conform or u r outcast the same way as the soyciety...anyway im just stating my opinion n think im defending it right as a few other users as well as a mod (Fat Link) agrees to my core argument so stop with the muh im known by mods...popularcel brag
The forum is full of experiences with escortmaxxing, in fact, since it was founded. The difference between one and the other is that one thing is boasting and another very different one is: I am a lonely man and I turn to foids under a transaction to supply that need.
i simply dont care how u accessed sex..u accessed it anyway while i cant n im the odd one out here jfl
It is concluded, again, that the ability to pay for sex does not make you the owner of sex, but rather its renter.
concluuuuuuder
 
Because this farsi man thinks that escortmaxxing = fakecel. Which is, by definition, false.
incel = CANT get sex
sexhavers.is
subfivesexhavers.is
nonvirgincel.is
100000escortfuckercels.is hahaha
 
ok they r chads cuz they dont pay but still i consider nonvirgin fuckers less of a chad than a real chad that only fucks and dumps virgins (if such a chad exists..we r theorizing)
When we enter into subjectivities, an objective analysis of things is difficult and the analysis becomes more difficult. "Chad" only that statistical deviation of men who manage to corner the majority of the sexual market due to the Pareto distribution.


marrying is not a point....the question is who fucks (and dumps) more: 1/10 moneymaxxer with a harem or a 10/10 virgin? hahahaha

10/10 and virgin are only holding hands under strong religious indoctrination. These types of men either do not exist or are mythological religious figures, like Yusuf (as you may recall).

Having a harem, having slaves and then paying for whores are 3 different things. I understand that you understand the difference between owning someone, forcing someone, and renting someone.
like mine...we dont have to restrict our debate to western cultures i dont know wtf is happening there with all those giga degenerate toilets...i am limited to my own experiences here in my own context/culture////here ntpill IS necessarily if u wanna get laid or u just rot in the house all days n no one comes to give u pussy, naturally

In all Islamic societies, except in very specific cases, where freemixing occurs or where men shamelessly court women, either for marriage or for fornication.

Those who have better appearance will have better natural treatment from the foids and they will approach him simulating "companionship and good treatment" and the normies will just have to choose a foid and try to marry her with work and money. I had the money and the economic stability, but not the looks.

Only Chads get pussy without requesting It, betabuxxing it or paying for It directly.
i dont say it breaks you free from inceldom,,,but you will simply not be incel..u just an ugly sexhaver who voluntarily broke your celibacy...."sexhaver incel" is an oxymoron how tf is my definition wrong its not even my definition its what it is in the book: incel = CANT get sex
anyway, if u know escortmaxxing wont fix u u shouldnt do it n betray nature as i said cuz it makes u stupid and simp asf,,,do u like fools and simps around here? of course u do
the implication of your argument is this: a 1/10 ugly moneymaxxer fucking (not celibate) 1000 escorts by paying them (voluntarily) = incel.....virgin (celibate) mentally fucked (involuntarily causes) touchless = non incel

Again we return to the IT bluepill argument. You don't stop being an incel just because you pay to fuck, because the consensual definition of "incel" is not just having sex, but having it genuinely. The foid that coined the term or the Christian religious who used the terms for the first time did not include prostitution because, logically, prostitution is the order of the day in most countries and that logically the natural process of pairing is not by paying, but in relationship.


if join date matters i will prove i was here before u....
thats fine, niggas here hate a touchless and nag about normies hating lonely/incel men....here has its own "norm" which u have to conform or u r outcast the same way as the soyciety...anyway im just stating my opinion n think im defending it right as a few other users as well as a mod (Fat Link) agrees to my core argument so stop with the muh im known by mods...popularcel brag

Prove it, Maybe other brocels know you, but it's clear that what has been punished is bragging, not being an escortcel.

There is no rule, the definition of the forum itself is defined, and agreed upon, as are its regulations, that sex having does not make you a fakecel because by definition a woman is required to be genuinely attracted to you and not the exchange of money so that you can do to a woman what you want with her orifices.

Fat Link contradicts the very definition of the forum, as a constitutive element and what inceldom itself is, And it is a fallacy of authority.

If you read carefully, I have only named the jannies to test my time on this forum, because your accusations of "infiltrator" are just you diverting attention from yourself. You are one of the few who defines inceldom as having or not having sex, regardless of whether it is paid for and genuinely obtained, ignoring the tenets of the blackpill, which apply by pure majority law.


i simply dont care how u accessed sex..u accessed it anyway while i cant n im the odd one out here jfl

Then you're not being honest about this debate, which makes it a huge waste of time because you're not being honest, disingenuous by definition.

If you want to have sex, you can, and Iran, like my country, is full of whores and women who sell you sex for temporary marriage, the same thing happens in Iraq as well. And when you pay for sex, if you do, you will be in the same state: no woman is attracted to you and you will not have family or concomitant relationships. But this forum is full of larpers and people with the same arguments as IncelTears cucks.
 
incel = CANT get sex
sexhavers.is
subfivesexhavers.is
nonvirgincel.is
100000escortfuckercels.is hahaha

Clearly trolling at this point, or ITcuck infiltrator and gaslighter.
 

Similar threads

Castaway
Replies
27
Views
346
incelerated
incelerated
Kissless0
Replies
7
Views
273
daydreamER
daydreamER
Freixel
Replies
17
Views
362
underballer
U
Karakol96
Replies
24
Views
439
Satriale's
S
Petain
Replies
93
Views
2K
SubhumanGamer
SubhumanGamer

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top