Discussion SJW Foids Finally Exposed, It's Now Over For Them.

[MarquisDeSade]

Enjoy lads.


Random Foid: "We have to destroy racism and stop discrimination! The 'evil' nazis and White Supremacists are terrorizing the world stopping social progress in building a world of peace, social justice, and harmony! Stop hate and prejudice now! Equality for everybody now!"

Incel Sorcerer: "Stop all discrimination you say? You're absolutely right, when are you women going to stop discriminating men on looks, money, income, education, career, societal position, and other attributes?"

Random Foid: "That's not the same thing! How can you compare that to systemic racism and other segments of discrimination within society?

Incel Sorcerer: "It's still a form of discrimination, is it not?"

Random Foid: "You can't compare individual sexual or dating discriminations as being systemic!"

Incel Sorcerer: "Sure, I can."

Random Foid: "No, you can't!"

Incel Sorcerer: "If a majority of women display certain attitudes concerning social, economic, or sexual prejudices regarding their overall assessment of men one could say it has very much indeed become systemic."

Random Foid: "Shut the fuck up incel!"

Incel Sorcerer: "Ah, we've now reached the crux of it all. You only pick certain types of prejudices, discriminations, or systemic abuses to be morally outraged about publicly but simultaneously within complete hypocritical fashion legitimize others. You feign outrage over specific kinds of discriminatory preferences people have about race or ethnicity all the while you have many of your own discriminatory preferences on other things within society that you deem entirely socially acceptable. That my dear is what we call picking and choosing which leads entirely to an error where it's fascinating that you cannot mentally comprehend your own inherent contradictions. Why should I be outraged by one particular or specific discrimination while you completely legitimize others?

With that being said, why should anybody take anything you say at all seriously?

 

[SuccessfulShark]

Woman don't understand logic, they only understand power

 

[MarquisDeSade]

Woman don't understand logic, they only understand power

Yup, same old, same old.

 

[Deleted member 35336]

Foids would rather die a horrible death than give ''creepy'' (Unattractive in femoid drivel) men any chance.

 

[BrettyBoy]

Women are shallow scum that also despise autistic men.

 

[Deleted member 33893]

When niggers do poorly in school and work it's the fault of society and we need more of dem programs for dem nigrums
But when I can't compete on the sexual market it's my fault and my fault alone. There is no bias towards attractive people in life

I ll tell you this. Women just love social justice because 60-70% of government jobs are female and it's much higher when the government job involves "mental help" "diversity training" and other garbage.

When women say defund the police invest more in metal health. They mean more jobs for my social studies degree

 

[MarquisDeSade]

Foids would rather die a horrible death than give ''creepy'' (Unattractive in femoid drivel) men any chance.

We need to start calling them sexual economic classicists, prejudiced bigots, and physical appearance discriminators, two can play at this game of social justice warrior activism.
I want my motherfucking social equality cunts right now at this very instance, stop with the sexual inequality, stop having hate towards me, and stop oppressing me.

Every time they try to shut us down we'll call them sexists and say they're oppressing us by gender discrimination.

Incels worldwide will go marching around the world with signs reading, "No justice, no peace, stop the gender hate now!"

Of course, foids would mock and ignore all of that completely, but it only outlines their overall hypocrisy and contradictions by the very first post made here.

 

[Angry_runt]

Social justice for sexual and racial minorities, social darwinism for short and ugly men.

 

[MarquisDeSade]

Social justice for sexual and racial minorities, social darwinism for short and ugly men.

Hmm, it's almost like they want social or sexual equality in society if it benefits them only exclusively, that can't be, is it? Big think here.

 

[Deleted member 1983]

theyd rather be in chad harem

 

[MarquisDeSade]

theyd rather be in chad harem

Hmm, only sexually attracted and reproducing with one segment of men while reducing all other segments of men into nothing at all. Yes, that's perfectly normal social and sexual equality if I've ever seen any, truly social or sexual egalitarian spiritual nirvana has been achieved here on earth. I'm totally convinced of it now.

 

[Deleted member 1983]

Hmm, only sexually attracted and reproducing with one segment of men while reducing all other segments of men into nothing at all. Yes, that's perfectly normal social and sexual equality if I've ever seen any, truly social or sexual egalitarian spiritual nirvana has been achieved here on earth. I'm convinced of it now.

 

[MarquisDeSade]

Genius image whoever made that.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Woman don't understand logic, they only understand power

Power of Chad and tingles in their pussy

 

[MarquisDeSade]

One more dialogue for the road boyos.


Random Foid: "That's just life fucking incel, the world isn't fair, the world is unequal, and you're not entitled to a wife, girlfriend, family of your own, or to sexual intercourse. You get nothing at all and you should be just content with that!"

Incel Sorcerer: "So, we should get rid of the formalities concerning the illusions of equality and fairness then? I then vow to reinstitute male patriarchy, enforced female submission, and a monarchy-style government making sure your type never resurfaces in future history ever again. The world isn't equal or fair, right? You shouldn't have a problem with that then being that you refuse to be entirely reciprocal in anything regarding men overall, finally an agreement on something."

Random Foid: "You fucking fascist, you can't do that! Female human rights and dignity!"

Incel Sorcerer: "Why should men be concerned with female rights and dignity when you show no concern towards either for us? Explain that to me, pro-tip, you can't. Game fucking over baby, goodnight princess."

When niggers do poorly in school and work it's the fault of society and we need more of dem programs for dem nigrums
But when I can't compete on the sexual market it's my fault and my fault alone. There is no bias towards attractive people in life

I ll tell you this. Women just love social justice because 60-70% of government jobs are female and it's much higher when the government job involves "mental help" "diversity training" and other garbage.

When women say defund the police invest more in metal health. They mean more jobs for my social studies degree

Exactly, understand gentlemen that there are three things that are weaknesses to all foids everywhere, they are their Achilles heel, money [which is their God BTW], hypocrisy [which they're very naturally inclined towards all the time], and contradiction. [Because their minds are not logical or rational.]

By exploiting all three of these weaknesses of theirs we will win this conflict over time, it's only a matter of time.

Ah, what the hell, I'll do one more dialogue for fun.


Random Foid: "You are not strong, accomplished in life, physically fit, mentally adept, or in well standing within society to be with me, I reject you for the fucking loser and lesser than you are! Somebody should drop you on an abandoned island segregated away from the rest of humanity for the scourge that you are!"

Incel Sorcerer: "If I didn't know any better, you're a social Darwinist in your judging or valuing of men dear woman."

Random Foid: "If you mean I reject inferiors like you, then yes I do!"

Incel Sorcerer: "Yet you complain when others do the same to niggers treating them the same way you treat men, if one social Darwinian mindset is appropriate why not all other kinds? What is good for the goose must also be for the gander. If even one inequality is tolerable or acceptable, then, should not all other inequalities be as well?"