Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Simp Shaming

DarkStar

DarkStar

ᛟ⌖CannibalMentalcelϟϟ▐┛
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
8,944
I'm sure many of us have all heard of the term "slut shaming" which is coined frequently by foids but especially feminists in order to avoid getting called out for their promiscuous, degenerate, and slutty behavior. In reality, it only applies when the foid ends up getting pissed off at the guy or he's some normie or incel-tier guy doing it.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/193z22g/slutshaming_is_getting_more_mainstream_and_im/



As you can see, femoids obviously have noticed the uptick in it due to a variety of reasons. Honestly, I find it interesting she primarily mentioned the whole sort of "trad" backlash thing, as opposed to what many would expect in the form of Tate and the such.

Sadly, however, it does seem that foids are not very susceptible to this:
Previous research using measures of susceptibility to influence that emphasize antisocial peer pressure also reported that females are less susceptible to peer influence (e.g., Steinberg & Silverberg, 1986), but this finding was usually attributed to the fact that the specific type of peer pressure studied was antisocial or that the age period studied was early and middle adolescence, a time when girls are thought to demonstrate more maturity. Our findings suggest that neither of these accounts is correct: Females are more resistant to peer influence than males in general, and they are so after as well as during adolescence. Consistent with this, other studies have found that adolescent girls report greater feelings of self-reliance than adolescent boys (Greenberger, 1982; Steinberg & Silverberg, 1986). Although girls may be more concerned than boys about their relations with others, which has been hypothesized to account in part for their greater vulnerability to depression (e.g., Cyranowski & Frank, 2000), this concern apparently does not translate into greater behavioral conformity.

In fact, one thing noted is that males, contrary ti popular societal beliefs & stigmas, are more susceptible to peer-pressure:

Results confirm that not all youth are equally susceptible to peer influence. Consistent with sexual script theory, boys evidence greater susceptibility to social pressure regarding sexual behavior than girls.

Obviously, this has nothing to do with foids insane in-group preference, but what if they did give into peer-pressure more so. :waitwhat:

As such, this got me thinking- why don't we utilize peer-pressure more in order to try and solve issues.

As you all know, simps are a big problem within our society: Whilst foids behavior is clearly problematic, simps are also clear enables of foids.

As such, why don't we bring in shaming towards simps. Clearly, we cannot change or alter foid nature at all- nor can we currently override any laws. However, what we do have the power to do -especially considering it's our fellow males- is rightfully call them out for their simp behavior.
 
They are already shamed quite a bit but I agree it needs to get worse.
Also like females most of these people just have no shame, you already have to be giga lowiq and have zero self respect to want to simp in the first place, the hazing will have to be pretty extreme to have an effect on some of these people.
Most simping happens online and behind closed doors too, it's honestly harder to attack than foids which is why I assume simp shaming isn't as common.
 
Related to this topic, what do you think of escortcels being allowed to promote the practice on here, I think this contributes to the problem. It's annoying for me to see something that contributes to hypergamy be so openly tolerated on here when this is one of the spaces that should shun that kind of behavior.
I'm not for outright banning them since I do think they are technically incels and we would have to ban too many users that already admitted they did this, but I think making it against the rules to promote it would be a good enough of a bulwark.
 
Much like how sluts are still sluts after being shamed, simps will still be simps after being shamed. I'd argue that normalfags actually do already shame people for simping, I mean after all the term went viral back in 2020.
1738998446188

We should shame simps regardless because they are responsible for boosting foids ego's to obnoxious amounts but don't expect it to cause any meaningful change in our society.
 
Related to this topic, what do you think of escortcels being allowed to promote the practice on here, I think this contributes to the problem. It's annoying for me to see something that contributes to hypergamy be so openly tolerated on here when this is one of the spaces that should shun that kind of behavior.
I'm not for outright banning them since I do think they are technically incels and we would have to ban too many users that already admitted they did this, but I think making it against the rules to promote it would be a good enough of a bulwark.
Yeah, escortcels are literal cucks since they screw a foid that screws with other men.

Another reason why they should feel shame is because whores take advantage and profit off of incel virginity and sexual needs, so escortcels enable these sluts by paying them. If you ask me, in some way it's cucked and simp behavior.
 
Yeah, escortcels are literal cucks since they screw a foid that screws with other men.

Another reason why they should feel shame is because whores take advantage and profit off of incel virginity and sexual needs, so escortcels enable these sluts by paying them. If you ask me, in some way it's cucked and simp behavior.
:yes:
 
There's no winning against this system it's a gigantic well oiled machine and we're losing our time fighting with shades on a desert forum ! :fuk:
 
Foids either have a hive mind or are self-reliant and resistant to what others think. Can we have any closure on this?
 
Suts and Simps need to be publicly executed.
 
There's no winning against this system it's a gigantic well oiled machine and we're losing our time fighting with shades on a desert forum ! :fuk:
The only thing we can do is hope (or cope) that our numbers will grow.
 
Related to this topic, what do you think of escortcels being allowed to promote the practice on here, I think this contributes to the problem. It's annoying for me to see something that contributes to hypergamy be so openly tolerated on here when this is one of the spaces that should shun that kind of behavior.
I'm not for outright banning them since I do think they are technically incels and we would have to ban too many users that already admitted they did this, but I think making it against the rules to promote it would be a good enough of a bulwark.
took the words out of my mind :bigbrain:
 

Similar threads

Justanotherbloke
Replies
10
Views
401
Justanotherbloke
Justanotherbloke
WeirdPanda
Replies
9
Views
236
Yabadadabadoo
Yabadadabadoo
NocturnalCel
Replies
16
Views
565
aspergillus_rotter
aspergillus_rotter
R(p)apist1488
Replies
32
Views
2K
ForcedMarriageNow
ForcedMarriageNow

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top