Deleted member 35171
Mother Nature's Failed Experiment
-
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2021
- Posts
- 3,316
Should incels be in support ofeugenics?
Imagine a world in which the bottom 10% of society in terms of genetic quality are neutered and there are massive incentives for couples with good genetic quality to have as many children as possible.
Over the years and with each generation, we can breed desirable genes into the population, eliminate the bad genes and expect an improvement in overall genetic quality.
I've written a list of positives and negatives if it's officially implemented.
Positives (+)
1. It affects both genders equaly. Subhumans whether male or female cannot breed and pass on their subhuman genes.
2. It prevents truecels from being born and eliminates unnecessary suffering.
3. It hastens the process of evolution.
4. It may greatly reduce competition between males when it comes to improving the perception of their genetic quality. In short if the populations is all chad/chadlite, males might stop looksmaxxing leaving up room to careermaxx instead.
Negatives (-)
1. Female standards may rise in parallel with avergae genetic quality in society. Chad only foids might become Gigachad only.
2. The people (simps) in charge may unequally enforce it across genders.
3. It might set a precedent to treat subhumans however they want. First it may start with subhuman neutering, then sentencing to death, then using them as rat labs for scientific experiments.
4. People may become even more obsessed with having good genetic material and looking good thus spending even more time on looksmaxxing.
So what do you guys think?
Imagine a world in which the bottom 10% of society in terms of genetic quality are neutered and there are massive incentives for couples with good genetic quality to have as many children as possible.
Over the years and with each generation, we can breed desirable genes into the population, eliminate the bad genes and expect an improvement in overall genetic quality.
I've written a list of positives and negatives if it's officially implemented.
Positives (+)
1. It affects both genders equaly. Subhumans whether male or female cannot breed and pass on their subhuman genes.
2. It prevents truecels from being born and eliminates unnecessary suffering.
3. It hastens the process of evolution.
4. It may greatly reduce competition between males when it comes to improving the perception of their genetic quality. In short if the populations is all chad/chadlite, males might stop looksmaxxing leaving up room to careermaxx instead.
Negatives (-)
1. Female standards may rise in parallel with avergae genetic quality in society. Chad only foids might become Gigachad only.
2. The people (simps) in charge may unequally enforce it across genders.
3. It might set a precedent to treat subhumans however they want. First it may start with subhuman neutering, then sentencing to death, then using them as rat labs for scientific experiments.
4. People may become even more obsessed with having good genetic material and looking good thus spending even more time on looksmaxxing.
So what do you guys think?
Last edited: