P
I don't think they should be tbh. The only reason they drive is so they can go over to Chad's house and get railed. Ending female driving would be a great way to slow their sluttery down.
No
Females should only be allowed to serve men end of the discussion.
No we need to limit foids freedom
No, they cannot be allowed to mog me any further.
If you wanna make the streets safer, the first step is to ban foid drivers
Foids are shitty drivers too
@LastGerman
Bluepill: Women should be allowed to drive
Redpill: Women should not be allowed to drive
Blackpill: Nobody should be allowed to drive, since private vehicles are emblematic of social alienation, running concomitant with suburbanization and narcissistic excesses. There should be public transportation only.
Redpill: Women should not be allowed to drive
Blackpill: Nobody should be allowed to drive, since private vehicles are emblematic of social alienation, running concomitant with suburbanization and narcissistic excesses. There should be public transportation only.
Foids Crash daddy’s car on a regular. My 18yo foid neighbor got a “mini” (typical whore mobile) for her birthday by daddio. She drives incredibly fast (and BAD). When her car is not parked in the driveway I drive extra careful on the streets.
But who drives the bus then
Exatly. The other reason it to emasculate men to be hnest. This is why they are doing it. They like it to destroy my German penis.
It never stops, also @rightfulcel
The redpill is correct here. Just lol at taking publix transportatio nas a grown up man. Also somebody needs to control public transportation.
The real blackpill sounds like this: Female driving is an atrocity to this world and it has to stop. Only men are allowed to drive and driver licences are for free and I get a BMW 320.
If femoid driving was banned, she would just call one of her twelve cuck orbiters to get a ride, no problemo.
OP and LastGerman, what do you guys think about female pilots? Should they be allowed to fly?
OP and LastGerman, what do you guys think about female pilots? Should they be allowed to fly?
P
Those cucks need to be stoned
And no, females shouldn't be pilots, they belong in the kitchen
Are taxis OK?
D
Would you drive a car if it wasn't a BMW? Say someone gifted you a Japanese car, would you be objected to that?
Also thugs should be denied driver's license imho, I can't stand them
I just cannot anymore @rightfulcel what is even going on? Females get free cars, can drive while I cannot do it. In order to overcome this I have to do 100 push-ups now. I swear, if I could drive I would buy myself a car and then paint a logo on it with the headline: BAN FEMAE DRIVING and I would drive all the time.
The more rights and assets you take away from women, the more control you have over them, and low-level men benefit from this.
Top 7 friends of incels.co
Top 7 friends of incels.co
I would appreciate its craftsmanship and I also would touch it in slightly sexual way.
@LastGerman what do you think about Bentleys?
Public transportation under fully automated anarchism will be controlled by AI, and a place for people to bond together on the basis of equality and recognize each other's common humanity, unlike contemporary public transportation, crowded as it is with lumpen-proletarian elements (intentionally), or private transportation in general, where people compare their status to one another in terms of whose car is better or worse or whatever.
You are currently very rustled at the fact that females are able to lord over you in their cars, but this same attitude characterizes car ownership in general, as it is a massive form of conspicuous consumption and aspirational bourgeois decadence.
Did you know that cars are manufactured specifically to look like faces from the front, whether more Chad-like or more feminine-like? All of this ridiculous narcissism must simply be liquidated ngl.
Capitalism is ironically serving to eradicate taxis in favor of more communal Uber pools, and the only thing that remains is for a dialectical materialist seizing of the means of transportation, so that manually driven cars, insofar as they do exist, are ridden/driven to each according to his need and ability.
Last edited:
Not this driver license pill crap again
P
Big Time
They can do shopping and serve us easier if they can drive, so yes.
I general appreciate the craftsmanship of the car automobile industry. Cars should be exlusive for men.
Sorry, but this is utter nonsense. Somebody has to create it and maintain it. No, this will just lead to more men who cannot take responsibility for their lives. Men need to be independent and strong therefore we should be able to drive a car.
It is worse than that. It is destroying my life.
''Conspicuous consumption'' that really sounds like what a typical leftist would say in order to take away the last remaining power of men. By the way, do you have a driver licence? If so, is not this quite hypocritical and if you do not have it, then are you perhaps struggling with it by any means?
What is wrong about narcissim? Also, of course I am aware of it, since I am aware of a lot of things. I also say, that there are no feminine cars. All cars belong to men.
First, females took the horses and now the cars. Mark my words.
No. This cucked mindset has to stop man. Females should not do anything. They should be glad that I do not kill them right at the spot.
Females should not drive. This should not even be up to debate.
They belong to the stable where I consume their milk.
Last edited:
Private vehicles have not given power to men, but rather detracted their power, by atomizing them.
As I said, suburbs where people don't even know their neighbors, and thus are powerless to politically organize against anything since they lack all collective identity, could not exist without private vehicles.
They have been advertised by car manufacturers as symbols of "rugged individualism" and "masculinity" in that sense, but all this means is your own estrangement from your fellow man, a way of feeling temporary cathartic relief from your oppression by capital because at least you can mog the pedestrian on the street and the person in the beaten up car next to you on the way to wageslaving in your debt-financed new car.
It is manifestly unpilled, and the feminist idea that men are compelled to conform to capitalism through vagina envy is unironically valid when it comes to people like you.
When you get scornfully rejected by a landwhale for not being Chad, you can come back to me with the answer.
"Take responsibility for your life," "man up," and "be independent" is precisely what the shills who want us to wageslave, betabuxx, and not get NEETbuxx say.
This entire framing needs to be destroyed along with the capitalist class ngl.
I do have a driver's license, but to say I'm hypocritical for this implies that I'm advocating for a set of individual ethics when I denounce private vehicle ownership, whereas I'm actually spurning such a perspective entirely, and making a social critique which must be dealt with on the macro level of social engineering.
Last edited:
Sorry, but that does not make any sense whatsoever. What about rural areas where everybody knows their neighboor but they also all have to drive?
And by the way, at least this person has car. I cannot even drive. That also reminds me... By the way, you ignored my question:
''By the way, do you have a driver licence? If so, is not this quite hypocritical and if you do not have it, then are you perhaps struggling with it by any means?''
Why should I do that? Why should I give the little and last power that I have to females only in order to being rejected by them?
Taking responsibility is not even a bad thing. Unfortunately this word have been hijacked by bluepilled people who want to force specifically men to do low-level work and other stuff.
Having responsibilities = having power - this is where I am coming from.
Also do not you think that your dreamworld also requires a lot of work and also a lot of wageslaves who will be of course men in order to maintain this system?
They don't need to drive to move from the kitchen to the bathroom.
They are also high in socialist tendencies. I experienced this first-hand when I was walking along the street in a rural area of Sacramento county last year, and was proactively given a free ride in the back of a pick-up truck.
It was very "red and black" pilled. The people in question noticed my need, and acted according to their ability.
It would show you what is wrong with narcissism, and how the issue here is not the decadence of females having abusive power over men, or the preference of men having abusive power over females, but abusive power in general, which must be eliminated.
Power is not desirable, but leads to oppression, corruption, and decadence. Belonging is desirable, as to a tribe, nation, or commune, and a shared sense of responsibility naturally follows from a shared sense of belonging and culture within such collectives.
It would be work worth doing, unlike the meaningless shuffling of trillions which occurs in the modern capitalist economy as a result of wageslavery, just so the bloodsuckers at the top can siphon off most of it for themselves.
I argue that cars are precisely part of this. To even attach masculinity to cars is nonsense, and a result of warped perceptions derived from malicious advertising.
The attachment of masculinity to cars is the flip side of the attachment of masculinity to work.
Saying "females shouldn't drive, only men should" is like saying "females shouldn't work, only men should be allowed to wageslave"
I answered this in an edit above. But to reiterate:
I do have a driver's license, but to say I'm hypocritical for this implies that I'm advocating for a set of individual ethics when I denounce private vehicle ownership, whereas I'm actually spurning such a perspective entirely, and making a social critique which must be dealt with on the macro level of social engineering.
Last edited:
No, of course not. They should just stay home and take care of her kids.
I really can't see why having a license would get you laid or increase your chances with women in the first place
P
If you're normie-esque it increases your transportation opportunities and logistics
Incredibly based if it happened
i feel unsafe even when my mom drives. women can hardly drive a vehicle and when they get their license for the first time first thing they do is just go over and get gangfucked by a group of chads
I
No. Islam used to be based but even they are slowly on the road of no return of cucking themselves by giving foids the chance to drive
True though, if you see a young foid driving her dad's car alone you can bet she's heading to carless chads house
True though, if you see a young foid driving her dad's car alone you can bet she's heading to carless chads house
Sell foids “cars” that lock from the outside and heat up until they are broiled alive
And in order to maintain a nation you need to have power over it or at least some power.
Or it just shows that power in the hands of females is a bad thing.
I argue that cars are precisely part of this. To even attach masculinity to cars is nonsense, and a result of warped perceptions derived from malicious advertising.
The attachment of masculinity to cars is the flip side of the attachment of wageslavery to masculinity.
Saying females shouldn't drive is like saying females shouldn't
, only men should be allowed to wageslave
How exactly is this nonsense?
Typical attributes which are linked to manhood in general: strength, courage, independence, leadership, and assertiveness
Having a driver licence and a car means to be independent.
You do not have to rely on public transportation.
You can make your own time schedule.
You can make your own destination.
I seriously do not know from where this cucked mindset is coming from, that this would have nothing to do with being a man...
Money is also not an argument against it since first off, Germany for example have 50 million cars and also public transportation here and also in general becomes more and more expensive as well.
So, in the end, driving is way more comfortable as well as handy and it is also an essential part of this life and era.
...No it is hypocritical because it is a contradiction to your whole standpoint here and you are not consistent at all. You are talking all big and yet you have a driver licence yourself. But at least yo uare honest here, I will admit that.
Also @rightfulcel thoughts on this?
If you turn to the scriptures of Saint ER, you will see his reflections about how the pursuit of power (namely, the pursuit of ownership over women and its maintenance) is what tears men apart more than anything else, and about how the goal of society should be to minimize if not totally eliminate avarice and greed.
By fundamentally agreeing with the idea that power is good, in contravention of ER's teachings, you fundamentally agree with all the oppression, bullying, and abuse which occurs on this earth, inasmuch as it sources from the top of power structures and trickles down onto everyone else.
Power in general is a bad thing.
Would you prefer it if men were the only the ones to drive and the only ones to wageslave, and were duly abused at work by Porky like the good little tradcucks they are, only to then drive home to their enslaved wives and abuse them in tandem, so as to unleash all their frustration over Porky?
Would you prefer it if abusive power was perpetuated rather than eliminated -- its worst effects merely offset onto someone else lower on the social hierarchy? If so, how can you factor freedom into this, especially as the dawn of full automation gives light to brighter possibilities for the full emancipation of mankind?
Everybody would agree that "this life and era" is not a masculine life and era, so for you to simultaneously argue that cars give a man his independence, and yet are integral to his social conformity, is massively contradictory.
I have just made a thread which points out how car use is correlated with obesity, which makes sense given how it's associated with a sedentary lifestyle. So is being fat and lazy "masculine" and "independent?"
It would only be contradictory if I were arguing about private car use in terms of individual ethics, which I am not.
This entire debate has been about society as a whole, not the individual. Indeed, I am specifically invalidating an individualist viewpoint through my leftist perspective, which is collectivist and socialist.
Last edited:
b
based and buspilled. Will cut pollution down, no car insurance bullshit, traffic down, less fat fucks. too bad the car lobby has cucked usa of good railroad infastructure for a century plus.
Busses became hegemonic means of public transport precisely because of the car industry, which bought and dismantled trolleys and replaced them with busses in order the encourage the transformation of American transportation to automobiles.
Since busses are not as comfortable as trolleys, the incentive was naturally to buy cars, hence busses are part and parcel of what I oppose here.
US railroad infrastructure is indeed lacking as a consequence of this all, but at least our antiquated rail-lines give us neo-Cynic philosophers something to catch a free ride on.
Last edited:
Power is necessary.
Yes.
No - But I have to add something. The currecnt system itself is problematic. We are now forced to work more for little money. This is not maintainable at all.
Why do you connect each points to another. For me, it is about driving - I never said, that men should slave their asses away for little money, in fact, I am AGAINST it.
It is about how you use this power. You only can think about bad things. That is just your mindset.
You compeltely lost your point as soon as you admitted that you do have a driver licence. So, do not come up with this nonsense here.
Only because this life and era is not masculine or less masculine or emasculating does not mean that specifically driving is not masculine. In fact, driving is one of the last remaining activities that is linked to independence, therefore it is a masculine trait.
Also, your whole communistic dreamworld is a whole condradiction.
And I have already answered it. The problem here is the overall diet. Cars are not responsibile for obesity.
I will quote you:
And you do have a driver licence which is completely contradictory to your whole standpoint. Why do you even have a driver licence if you are against it? That does not make any sense whatsoever.
I do not know what to say. Is this just a joke? I actually like your posts but are you serious here? I really feel like I am in some leftist forum now.
Last edited:
My mum is finding out things about a car she's had for years that she would've known if she took the time out to learn about the car.
Foids should not drive. Some foid just cut off a tractor traiilr/lorry where I live. The truc couldnt stop and it buckled and jackkifed as it tipped on its side. The foid and her car, somehow, were fine. The truck driver is dead. No penalty for her. JFL at this country's cucked laws.
This is a classic fallacy. I can criticize a socially hegemonic behavior while still engaging in the said behavior, because I am not responsible for the fact that I have been compelled to engage in the said behavior.
It's like saying "you can't criticize capitalism if you own a smartphone."
Or "you can't criticize illegal immigration to the US if you eat Mexican food," or, more pertinently, "you can't criticize Arab immigration to Germany if you eat kabobs."
All these issues go beyond the mere individual level and what an individual does or does not do.
I am not making philosophical moral arguments for individual ethics here, but social critiques, which necessarily require that I am part of what I criticize, inasmuch as everybody is a part of society and subjected to the same social pressures.
You seem to be projecting egoism onto me, and cannot compute how somebody could possibly think beyond themselves and their own individual selfishness as based in conformist desires.
Because they are directly connected together.
The idea of a car as symbolizing masculinity is directly connected to the idea of work as symbolizing masculinity.
What do most people use their cars for most of the time? To drive to and from work.
Before Auschwitz, where you Germans told the Jews they would be "freed through work," how did the Nazis gas Jews? In a motor vehicle:
It's all connected!
Okay, let's just ignore the lack of physical activity which contributes to obesity.
What facilitates the poor diet of Americans? It is still cars, which is what an American uses to go to the drive through and order an unhealthy meal, after a long day of wageslaving (which itself is based upon car use -- consider in this connection the fact that the most obese Americans are truckers, who also compose the single largest segment of the US economy).
It is a totally correct mindset to associate power with abuse, unlike an egoistic mindset which I see coming from you.
Btw, I like your posts too, and don't confuse a critique of your views as an attack on your person. It is just further confirmation of your egoism if you do ngl.
Last edited:
This is not a classic fallacy. Not at all. I jsut pointe dout the hypocrisy. But once again, I do appreciate that you are at least honest.
You are supporting something which you are against it therefore you are inconsistent. Of course you can pariticipated in it, but once again, it makes you inconsistent and I just pointed it out.
A more fittinng comparison would be:
A politcian is talking about global warming and how bad it is to drive but he has a driver licence and he is actually not following his own agenda but he expects everyone else to follow it. This is called ''being hypocritical''. Of course you can do it but once again, some people will call you out for bein inconsistent.
Once again, you are not very consistent here. We also have to point out the general hypocrisy. If we apply your logic, then nobody is allowed to use German inventions, but Germans. Nobody is allowed to use German goods. Of course this also applies vice versa.
But not a driver licence. You decided it for yourself. You did it on purpose.
Egoism do not have to be badt, but also necessary:
The self, especially with a sense of self-importance.
It is about you (yourself) and you have a specific intention which you want to express here.
I mean driving and slave your ass away for little money - because I am AGAINST the latter. Most work is not fair at all, in fact, it is unfair and I also had to experience it by mself.
And without a driver licence, you cannot even find work in the first place. It is a vicious circle.
Good question. How exactly did they gas the jews or a better question, how exactly did the Nazis collect 6 million jews and kill them all after 1941 while conducting a war at the same time?
You are ignoring the impact of the overall diet. People who are obese might also have a tendecy to it due to genetics and then a bad diet on top of it are the cause such problems in the first place and not driving itself (although it might have some impact on it). Also, there are a lot of opportunities to cut down weight, even though it is hard. Instead of driving to McDonalds, people who are obese could drive to a gym or perhaps to a forest, so they can walk for 30 minutes or 1 hour free in nature.
Well, it is up to you how to use your power.
Women's place is at home, or with their husband and/or children, in preference.
Anyway, in cities public transportation is relatively dense, so foids could still get to have their chads cocks.
I would say yes and no. Yes, because they need to take their children to school and back, among others. No, because you see them having the driver's license more and more - it's intentionally done by many states to render everything easier to get for foids in the name of "equality", but much harder for men than it used to be, like many others things. Curiously, I have seen a few women driving very well, while many or must of them are really dumb drivers. They are the ones pushing for more road laws, rendering the driver's license more complicated and easy to be withdrawn, police and radar controls, prison sentences. Also, I observed many foids are anti-car and would insult easily car-drivers for nothing, especially the ones on bicycles.
Anyway, in cities public transportation is relatively dense, so foids could still get to have their chads cocks.
I would say yes and no. Yes, because they need to take their children to school and back, among others. No, because you see them having the driver's license more and more - it's intentionally done by many states to render everything easier to get for foids in the name of "equality", but much harder for men than it used to be, like many others things. Curiously, I have seen a few women driving very well, while many or must of them are really dumb drivers. They are the ones pushing for more road laws, rendering the driver's license more complicated and easy to be withdrawn, police and radar controls, prison sentences. Also, I observed many foids are anti-car and would insult easily car-drivers for nothing, especially the ones on bicycles.
Hypocrisy = not acting in accordance to what you preach.
I am not preaching here that private car use is somehow evil for an individual to do, just pointing out how in the aggregate, private car use has contributed to things like social alienation, sedentary lifestyles, and obesity, and that to associate it with masculinity as you do is therefore misguided.
I am not against the use of a motor, anymore than a Marxist is against the use of a factory just because it is owned by a capitalist and he makes critiques of the latter.
I never said that you shouldn't get a driver's license and operate a motor vehicle, but that to attach the transcendental meaning that you do to these things is absurd, and can even serve to make a mockery of this forum.
Perhaps it can be used as a way of supporting the idea that "sex isn't even that important, anyway, and it is easy to get if you meet the basic minimum requirements," a sentiment that anybody would naturally express of driving a car if they accomplished the simple bureaucratic tasks required to do this and gain some experience.
>should females be allowed-
No.
No.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
