RageFuel Sexually successful guys that are mostly blue pulled piss me off more then anything

[Mulattocel]

Me and my chadlite best friend are always arguing about this. He sees female behavior on a day to day basis. The way they whore themselves to him and his other Chad friends and he is still fucking bluepilled. This son of a bitch literally told me the hottest thing to a girl is maturity, having a nice car, and having your own place. It was one of the stupidest fucking things I’ve ever heard. He then went on to say the oldest person at a party will pick up girls because women are “looking for men not boys”. And he said I could slay by simply talking with women and saying “let’s go back to my place”. As if having your own place would make any difference if you’re unattractive. Fucking retarded man. There are a lot of chads that are like this to. So ignorant and lacking of self awareness but yet still gets everything handed to them in life. I hate them for this reason.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

Same with any successful person, they think muh hard work got them there

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

They can never admit it was all luck. They want to believe it was their hard work

 

[Deleted member 24160]

I'm not defending him but he personally sees the best women can be when their around him so he probably thinks thats just how it is and everyone else is "doing something wrong."

 

[Gymcelled]

He has never been unattractive, he doesn't know shit. He can't imagine women avoiding you 24/7 and giving looks of disgust before they even get to know you.

For him interacting with women is a positive experience. His life experiences are completely different from yours or mines.

Also

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning
Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.

Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.

They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:

• Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
• In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:

• Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]

They can never admit it was all luck. They want to believe it was their hard work

Exactly

 

[kikecel]

He has never been unattractive, he doesn't know shit. He can't imagine women avoiding you 24/7 and giving up disgusted looks before they even get to know you.

For him interacting with women is a positive experience. His life experiences are completely different from yours or mines.

Also

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning
Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.

Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.

They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:

• Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
• In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:

• Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]

Exactly

very high IQ

 

[Mulattocel]

He has never been unattractive, he doesn't know shit. He can't imagine women avoiding you 24/7 and giving up disgusted looks before they even get to know you.

For him interacting with women is a positive experience. His life experiences are completely different from yours or mines.

Also

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning
Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.

Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.

They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:

• Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
• In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:

• Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]

Exactly

High iq good scientific post my man

 

[OnGP]

They can never admit it was all luck. They want to believe it was their hard work

This.

 

[Gymcelled]

very high IQ

High iq good scientific post my man

It's from the incel wiki. Another study

Physically attractive individuals are more likely to believe in a 'just world'
The Just World Fallacy is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person's actions will bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, such that all noble actions will be eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished. A person viewing the dating world through the lens of the Just World Fallacy would thus assume that those who succeed in dating are being deservedly rewarded, and those who fail are equally deserving of their failure.

Researchers have found that societal privilege is the strongest predictor of belief in the Just World Fallacy, and specifically within that, that physical attractiveness particularly predicts one's beliefs that the world is just.

The more physically attractive a person is, the more likely they are to believe the world is just. The less physically attractive a person is, the less likely they are to believe the world is just. It is concluded that a person's physical appearance powerfully shapes how they experience and view the world.

Quotes:

• Previous work has consistently found that belief in a just world is strongly correlated with societal privilege.
• Both self-rated attractiveness (experiment one) and attractiveness rated by other persons (experiment two) were found to predict endorsement of belief in a just world.
• Additionally, both attractiveness measures were found to have a relationship with participant’s level of life satisfaction.
• These findings suggest that physical attractiveness powerfully affects our subjective experience as a human and that just-world beliefs are driven, at least in part, by personal experience with inequality.

Reference:

• Westfall RS, Millar MG, Lovitt A. 2018. The Influence of Physical Attractiveness on Belief in a Just World. Psychological Reports. 122(2): 536-549. [Abstract]

 

[Deleted member 23483]

They can never admit it was all luck. They want to believe it was their hard work

No one likes admitting they’re playing life on an easier difficulty than others.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Same with any successful person, they think muh hard work got them there

 

[Words2_live_bye]

They can never admit it was all luck. They want to believe it was their hard work

 

[ordinaryotaku]

It's from the incel wiki. Another study

Physically attractive individuals are more likely to believe in a 'just world'
The Just World Fallacy is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person's actions will bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, such that all noble actions will be eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished. A person viewing the dating world through the lens of the Just World Fallacy would thus assume that those who succeed in dating are being deservedly rewarded, and those who fail are equally deserving of their failure.

Researchers have found that societal privilege is the strongest predictor of belief in the Just World Fallacy, and specifically within that, that physical attractiveness particularly predicts one's beliefs that the world is just.

The more physically attractive a person is, the more likely they are to believe the world is just. The less physically attractive a person is, the less likely they are to believe the world is just. It is concluded that a person's physical appearance powerfully shapes how they experience and view the world.

Quotes:

• Previous work has consistently found that belief in a just world is strongly correlated with societal privilege.
• Both self-rated attractiveness (experiment one) and attractiveness rated by other persons (experiment two) were found to predict endorsement of belief in a just world.
• Additionally, both attractiveness measures were found to have a relationship with participant’s level of life satisfaction.
• These findings suggest that physical attractiveness powerfully affects our subjective experience as a human and that just-world beliefs are driven, at least in part, by personal experience with inequality.

Reference:

• Westfall RS, Millar MG, Lovitt A. 2018. The Influence of Physical Attractiveness on Belief in a Just World. Psychological Reports. 122(2): 536-549. [Abstract]

This explains quite a lot tbh.

 

[GoffSystemQB]

And he said I could slay by simply talking with women and saying “let’s go back to my place”.

Something certainly going to happen after you say that, but I think it's going to involve the police and being accused of sexual harrassment.

 

[Emba]

He has never been unattractive, he doesn't know shit. He can't imagine women avoiding you 24/7 and giving looks of disgust before they even get to know you.

For him interacting with women is a positive experience. His life experiences are completely different from yours or mines.

Also

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning
Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.

Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.

They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:

• Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
• In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:

• Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]

Exactly

Based and sciencepilled

 

[Tempus Edax Rerum]

This.

That avatar is so offensive.

 

[OnGP]

That avatar is so offensive.

Why?

 

[SMPcel]

They can never admit it was all luck. They want to believe it was their hard work

 

[Tempus Edax Rerum]

Why?

Only idiots smile.

 

[OnGP]

Only idiots smile.

Smilin' at the madness m8