Other bodily traits females are attracted to include long clavicle length, thick shoulder width, leanness/lack of belly fat and 6 pack abs, all of which are mostly genetically determined and very difficult to change. Of course women are vastly more attracted to male faces than bodies, whereas the opposite is true for men.
men can want female faces but almost usually it's for non-general configuration based men.
Female faces need to be attractive to ensure good genetic prominence. BUt yes if men are just into carnal fucking, then that's another story. BUt women want thigns to fit a social prominence agenda, and not just to fuck like neanderthals as men do.
Abs aren't difficult to change as clavicle not by a long shot.
But women want to have the identity/ physio implication, and lineal implication/ life story that the person didnt' bust ass and switch course. Women want born dominators. The pedigree of a born dominator is about non changeable traits.
Women want finesse from the highest denominator.
Novelty not effectiveness. Even a gymcel who could beat down a chad in a fight when he martial art maxxed himself ot power will still have females not on his side.Women want to be divine/ godhood, so the pedigree of someone having potential for that matters more than a well-made prodigy.
Fucked up.
Women want winning sidedness from men not just from his own life, but to have the super resonation of it being from his genes/ pureblood that would stem from an unbroken line of genetic perfeciton to make even the most meticulous and detailed measurement of a face in effect.
IT's the delicateness of bone structure in the face, and how much impression it makes about what kind of person you are, your life, etc. that makes the physioimplication of it so prominent.
God cursed the world when he made the skullshape so variating that it's the barometer for genetic distinction, along with making the world fileld with so many flat/ round featured nonwhite negroids/ mongoloids.