Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

sexual objectification is such a retarded concept

Ap0calypse

Ap0calypse

Radical Faction
★★★
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Posts
4,264
lol id kill just for the opportunity to be seen as a sexual being by the opposite sex

being permanently sexually unattractive to every single female while going through your entire life with raging hormones compulsing you to desire sex>getting angry over unattractive males complimenting you for being hot
 
Last edited:
It's not objectification if Chad wants to rawdog her anus after meeting her on Tinder, it's romantic

If you want to take her on multiple dates then have sex with a condom, it is
 
Foids love being sexually objectified. Not by sub-8 men but by Chads. They wear short skimpy clothes for Chads not for us. They flaunt their sexual parts for Chads, not for us.
 
men love being "sexual objects", too bad only Chad ever gets this
meanwhile women HATE when beta males do this to them, or have fetishes for certain types of women
 
women wouldn't complain about BS like this if it was chad sliding into their dms all the time
 
Ugly feminists bitter they couldn't get Chad came up with most of this stuff, which already took over universities as early as the 70s.

The logic behind it is nonsensical garble and it's obvious it is just a way to get back at men since how the hell is a male not going to look at a woman as a sexual being? They are essentially making human nature itself a crime, assuring all men are guilty by default by virtue of being what they are.
 
The idea of sexual objectification doesn't make sense. Isn't sexualizing someone also humanising them? We're the one's being dehumanised by having our sexuality denied
 
It's all more hypocritical when you consider it was women who asked for the sexual revolution. When the "patriarchy" was in charge, modesty and propriety was what men wanted in a woman. It was women themselves who told men that was oppressive and that they had a right to flaunt their sexuality as they pleased, and now they want to make it criminal for men to look at women as sexual entities.

The moral of the story here is that there is a reason women were told to shut up and listen in traditional societies, because when left on their own devices they can only come up with absurdities like this.
 
The idea of sexual objectification doesn't make sense. Isn't sexualizing someone also humanising them? We're the one's being dehumanised by having our sexuality denied

It is.

Objectifying, however, isn't. Objectifying is the idea of merely wanting to fuck, then discard, with complete disregard for their personhood (thoughts, feelings, aspirations etc. - all that bullshit).

Sexualizing somebody can be done without objectifying them. When you see a beautiful woman and imagine having a family with her, raising sons (no daughters. what are you, some kind of cuck? jk... keep your dad hand strong, if you have a thot), and coming home to a cooked meal with your kids running at you and yelling, "daddy!"...

When you're doing all of that, only a fucking idiot, dried cunt feminist would call that objectification.
 
lol id kill just for the opportunity to be seen as a sexual being by the opposite sex

being permanently sexually unattractive to every single female while going through your entire life with raging hormones compulsing you to desire sex>getting angry over unattractive males complimenting you for being hot
Based
 
Its only sexual objectification if he is a non-chad.
 
It’s an innate desire for holes to be sexually objectified. Only by chads of course. Holes will be holes, man. Don’t listen to what holes say, observe their actions instead. They truly are non-sentient subhuman creatures.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top