Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Selection for height makes more sense than for attractiveness

anandkonda

anandkonda

Adi naa pilla ra... adi naa pilla
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 21, 2024
Posts
18,589
From what I understood inheritance of height is 80%. While it's only 50-70% for Facial Attractiveness.

So from a eugenics perspective it makes more sense to prioritize selection for tallness over selection for facial attractiveness basically.

So when searching and choosing for a partner it should be Height > Face, to make sure your children inherit that from your partner.
 
@WorthlessSlavicShit am I getting this right?
 
prioritise both. EUGENICS NOW!
 
prioritise both. EUGENICS NOW!
Yeah but if you had to choose between 3/10 5'9 foid or a 8/10 4'10 foid, I'd choose the former
 
Yeah but if you had to choose between 3/10 5'9 foid or a 8/10 4'10 foid, I'd choose the former
I'd rather the second one for my own happiness. I just wouldn't have kids.
 
Yeah but if you had to choose between 3/10 5'9 foid or a 8/10 4'10 foid, I'd choose the former
true but prioritise both! children need to be blessed with good genes and femcels and foidlets need to be barred from reproducing by law asap to keep trucels from being born
 
From an evolutionary perspective having a high IPD and a deep set eyes might be more important and practical than being 6 feet tall.
 
I'd rather the second one for my own happiness. I just wouldn't have kids.
I'd still choose the tall foid because she's superior. Tallness is superiority

But I'm talking about eugenics, think about your children. Which of them would give you better children?
 
From an evolutionary perspective having a high IPD and a deep set eyes might be more important and practical than being 6 feet tall.
Why do you think that?
 
So from a eugenics perspective it makes more sense to prioritize selection for tallness over selection for facial attractiveness basically.
This is how size differences between males and females works:
 
When I escape inceldom, I'm going to pick a woman that's at least 5'6. Just so my sons have a getter chance, even though I'm very attracted to shorter girls.
 
Why do you think that?
Having a high IPD means a larger and more robust cranium. Furthermore, greater interpupillary distance translates to a wider, more masculine facial structure. Having deep set, hunter-esque eyes increases the perception of a strong jawline, especially when viewed in profile.

There's also the more functional reasons: having an high IPD means you have a better stereoscopic vision (depth perception), and deep-set eyes are less exposed to injury or environmental elements.
 
height is 0% genetic. thats why indians and blacks are 5ft5 in india and africa

but are 5ft10 in america like whites

and the first worlders which are short, are short because they had diseases or ate a third world diet due to poorness/shit parents



face and skin color is genetic tho
 
When I escape inceldom, I'm going to pick a woman that's at least 5'6. Just so my sons have a getter chance, even though I'm very attracted to shorter girls.
Aren't you a tallfag? Please fuck off from here
 
What's the plan for that?
Gymmaxing, working on my social skills and saving up money. I might need to book a trip to Turkey too and get my hair fixed.

Aren't you a tallfag? Please fuck off from here
I'm an incel. Stop being divisive. We aren't all equal. Some of us have it easier than others, but we're in the same boat.
 
Having a high IPD means a larger and more robust cranium. Furthermore, greater interpupillary distance translates to a wider, more masculine facial structure. Having deep set, hunter-esque eyes increases the perception of a strong jawline, especially when viewed in profile.

There's also the more functional reasons: having an high IPD means you have a better stereoscopic vision (depth perception), and deep-set eyes are less exposed to injury or environmental elements.
I have deep set eyes and good jaw but I'd still look like a dalit standing next to even a 2/10 tallfag because I'm a midget.

In the wild or in general taller people are perceived to be and are more dominant and intimidating. That's why they become leaders easier and have more sexual success
 
Last edited:
@kay' what do you think?
 
height is 0% genetic. thats why indians and blacks are 5ft5 in india and africa

but are 5ft10 in america like whites

and the first worlders which are short, are short because they had diseases or ate a third world diet due to poorness/shit parents



face and skin color is genetic tho
:feelstastyman::feelstastyman:
 
I have deep set eyes and good jaw but I'd still look like a dalit standing next to even a 2/10 tallfag because I'm a midget.

In the wild or in general taller people are perceived to be and are more dominant and intimidating. That's why they because leaders easier and have more sexual success
At the end of the day, it’s like a scale: if your face is too ugly, you’d need to compensate by being very tall, and if you’re very short, you’d need to compensate by being a chad, and depending on how bad one feature is - no amount of compensation can save you.

But since height is a bit more heritable I guess it would make sense to focus on it, at least to some extent.
 
At the end of the day, it’s like a scale: if your face is too ugly, you’d need to compensate by being very tall, and if you’re very short, you’d need to compensate by being a chad, and depending on how bad one feature is - no amount of compensation can save you.

But since height is a bit more heritable I guess it would make sense to focus on it, at least to some extent.
Exactly
 
I think for men its height and for women its face.
Choosing a tall but uglier mother is better than choosing a short but prettier mother
 
I have deep set eyes and good jaw
:yes::yes:
revenge of the sith episode 3 GIF by Star Wars
 
its such a high iq take that you think its retarded, but youre actually the low iq one. embarrassing
How tf are Balkans and Poland the tallest despite all the wars then? And why are Nipcucks stunted at 5'7?
 
When I escape inceldom, I'm going to pick a woman that's at least 5'6. Just so my sons have a getter chance, even though I'm very attracted to shorter girls.
Same I’d only go for a foid who’s at least 5ft6 despite me being only a few inches taller. I will never forsake my son to a life of manletism
 
How tf are Balkans and Poland the tallest despite all the wars then? And why are Nipcucks stunted at 5'7?
Baltic people are quite tall. Latvian foids are the tallest in the world - average height 170cm or 5ft7 in freedom units
 
Yeah but if you had to choose between 3/10 5'9 foid or a 8/10 4'10 foid, I'd choose the former
3/10 5ft9 foid easy

Hopefully she has some white genetics even partially

I wouldn’t want to go for a curry foid or goon foid

I’d take a sheboon even provided I get a mogger BBC son
 
How tf are Balkans and Poland the tallest despite all the wars then? And why are Nipcucks stunted at 5'7?
1734997492014


because of their diet? they eat the best diets and most protein

meanwhile jap diet is known to be shit, its just noodles, soy and fish



certain cultures promote certain diets, and also the environments

if height was genetic, then all curries and africans in the west would be 5ft4, but that's clearly not the case.
 
View attachment 1352039

because of their diet? they eat the best diets and most protein

meanwhile jap diet is known to be shit, its just noodles, soy and fish



certain cultures promote certain diets, and also the environments
If muh protein is the answer then Hong Kong gooks would have been the tallest in the world. Yet they are barely average
if height was genetic, then all curries and africans in the west would be 5ft4, but that's clearly not the case.
Nobody said full height is genetic, nigger. But height potential is 100% genetic and height IS highly inherited.
 
its such a high iq take that you think its retarded, but youre actually the low iq one. embarrassing
Bruh, that's one of the most uninformed takes I've seen on this website, and that's not an easy bar to clear.

The fact that malnourished people don't develop to their full potential doesn't imply anything about genetics or heritability of height as a feature. Put a bunch of people at an equal footing, and height will be 80% determined by the genes of their parents. Saying that first world Africans and Indians being taller than third world ones who have a double-digit child malnourishment rate proves that height isn't highly genetically determined is damn near cargo cult tier thinking:shock::feelsseriously:.

Nobody said full height is genetic, nigger. But height potential is 100% genetic and height IS highly inherited.
 
If muh protein is the answer then Hong Kong gooks would have been the tallest in the world. Yet they are barely average
they dont eat more protein or calories than other countries though lol so no they wouldnt be

Nobody said full height is genetic, nigger. But height potential is 100% genetic and height IS highly inherited.
height is 0% genetic

the only reason you think some people are capped by genetics, like first worlders, is actually because those first worlders had diseases or 3rd world tier diets

theres 0 studies showing height is more than 20% genetic. go find me one and report back. and no, you cant use news articles as your source
 
Bruh, that's one of the most uninformed takes I've seen on this website, and that's not an easy bar to clear.

The fact that malnourished people don't develop to their full potential doesn't imply anything about genetics or heritability of height as a feature. Put a bunch of people at an equal footing, and height will be 80% determined by the genes of their parents. Saying that first world Africans and Indians being taller than third world ones who have a double-digit child malnourishment rate proves that height isn't highly genetically determined is damn near cargo cult tier thinking:shock::feelsseriously:.
no its 100% facts and ive read all the studies.

you arent informed, havent read the studies, and just repeating what you heard other low iq incels online say. therefore you are the uninformed one.
 
they dont eat more protein or calories than other countries
Hong Kong literally has the highest protein consumption in the entire world yet they are just 5'9. What tf are you talking about?
 
Bruh, that's one of the most uninformed takes I've seen on this website, and that's not an easy bar to clear.

The fact that malnourished people don't develop to their full potential doesn't imply anything about genetics or heritability of height as a feature. Put a bunch of people at an equal footing, and height will be 80% determined by the genes of their parents. Saying that first world Africans and Indians being taller than third world ones who have a double-digit child malnourishment rate proves that height isn't highly genetically determined is damn near cargo cult tier thinking:shock::feelsseriously:.
Exactly :yes:
 
Hong Kong literally has the highest protein consumption in the entire world yet they are just 5'9. What tf are you talking about?
Also, Slovakia has one of the lowest per capita protein consumptions in the entire Eurasia (what got me to make a comment about how I'd love to be either American or Chinese on here), yet I still get mofos randomly accusing me of being a fakecel because we are one of the taller nations in Europe:feelsseriously:.

1734998614985



:feelsokman:
 

Similar threads

Roastie Crusher
Replies
0
Views
128
Roastie Crusher
Roastie Crusher
Mr. Agent Clark
Replies
10
Views
300
Mr. Agent Clark
Mr. Agent Clark
JustanotherKanga
Replies
43
Views
953
JustanotherKanga
JustanotherKanga

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top