Security and Freedom

[Limitcel]

Many see transgression as something that should be the rule for all people, that is, breaking with social functions in the name of primitive freedom.
That's what I used to think, especially after reading Ted Kaczynski.

But it is worth remembering the reasons why man exchanged his freedom for security, accepted the monopoly of state violence so as not to have to go into armed conflict with his neighbors over a fence
Or workin without without art (Unrewarding work, work without the feeling of achievement and prestige) to have some guarantee of food at the end of the month, a monthly salary

What is your view on the conflict between freedom and security?

 

[Misogynist Vegeta]

Those who value security over freedom deserve neither.

 

[smegma producer]

freedom implies one can acquire what one need to defend one self. so you sacrifice all the other elements of freedom for security when you could still very well acquire security with said freedom. as vegeta said:

Those who value security over freedom deserve neither.

 

[Lee Know]

Those who value security over freedom deserve neither.

We are all forced to participate in society though but normies willingly submit to wageslavery and let themselves become slaves just for some fake coins and pieces of paper. Wageslavery is cucked. Lol imagine waging away your life to make rich people even richer. Couldn't be me

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

 

[KrazedKanga]

Segregation is the humane thing to do for both sides for freedom .
The LGBT will complain at first about losing privilege about being around normal people.
They at first aren't going to like the reality of living around
their own kind. Eventually they will get use to it . Its the rational way.

 

[underballer]

Those who value security over freedom deserve neither.

Based

 

[Freixel]

I know it's not the topic of the thread, but it's adjacent:

"Economic freedom" = Power hoarded by monopolies and corporations = Enslavement of the lower working classes

It's the same

The Yankees are brainwashed into believing they are "free"

Only that they prefer to be enslaved by a less visible capitalist power than by the State.

What Unabomber proposes is to return to a state of primitive freedom where capitalist economic power does not yet exist (neither does the state), basically going back in time, his philosophy is not applicable to the modern life of standard man.