Blackpill [Sciencepill] [Evolutionpill] Why women prefer Chad

[diogenes]

It's very simple.

Men are designed to impregnate as many females as possible. We are all men here and if we had the chance we would fuck every hot woman walking past us in the streets. We would breed them all. It is evident as we are designed ready to spread our seed every 5-10 minutes or so, and some men have no refractory period at all. In the past the strong Chad could easily overpower women and rape them, but that wasn't necessary as the women naturally flocked to him. But when it was necessary to rape a female from another tribe he could easily do so and the woman would be stuck with his child.

But women have to spend 9 months pregnant. Women in the past (default state of humanity) didn't have access to maternity and childbirth assistance. They would more often than not die, as they were a big fat slow-moving target, or simply died during childbirth. Thus they wanted to make sure to at least carry Chad's seed to term, even if she dies her genes live on in Chad's son. She obviously did not want to carry an incel's seed to childbirth to then die and have an incel born.

Just like in our other ape cousins (we humans are apes as well) as well as other species, the Chad alpha males control harems and gets exclusive rights to breed with all females, keeping the incel virgin beta males from breeding. Likewise did our ancient human ancestors do. The Chad alpha male(s) would have privileged breeding and sex rights, meanwhile the beta males would be lucky to get pity sex if anything.

Women (and men) are still like this today. Because even if we are living in concrete jungles, you can't go against nature, buddy boyo.

 

[ThirdWorldcel]

CuckTears will deny this by saying "muh morality" or "muh proggressive society"

 

[Deleted member 5861]

yes bro

 

[Deleted member 12256]

If we exist back then , or if we where animals we would be Ωmegas. But back then you could rape or start your own pack.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

CuckTears will deny this by saying "muh morality" or "muh proggressive society"

They think saying looks is a factor in attractiveness makes you a Nazi. That moment when you can't even exaggerate their insanity + stupidity.

 

[diogenes]

If we exist back then , or if we where animals we would be Ωmegas. But back then you could rape or start your own pack.

True. We can still see this in nature. The incel virgin beta males band together to challenge Chad alpha males in order to take over their harems. Unfortunately we have been placed at a further disadvantage by "muh societee" and can no longer engage in this activity.

 

[ThirdWorldcel]

They think saying looks is a factor in attractiveness makes you a Nazi. That moment when you can't even exaggerate their insanity + stupidity.

I compared who has more chance to date, a deformed dude or a male actor, they whined about it and banned me for pushing negativity.

 

[gylo]

You didn't need to pen a whole tretise to rationalize why women prefer Chad.

You just have to look at picture of Chad next to an adoring woman to understand that it's over

 

[diogenes]

You didn't need to pen a whole tretise to rationalize why women prefer Chad.

You just have to look at picture of Chad next to an adoring woman to understand that it's over

It's always good to know WHY exactly and to understand all the details.

 

[incel-american]

I'm going to "fisk" your post.

It's very simple.
Men are designed to impregnate as many females as possible.

It's more fair to say that men are sexually aroused easily and are DTF way more than women. However, this is counter-balanced by the choosiness of the female.

We are all men here and if we had the chance we would fuck every hot woman walking past us in the streets.

Meh. I've grown bored of porn. I'm pretty certain you'd get bored by the time you'd fucked your 19th hot woman. You'd probably start longing for a relationship and something more stable. In any case "if we had the chance" is a big if (even for Chad.) The typical female is choosy and would even make it a bit of a challenge for Chad (and of course an impossibility for an even less attractive guy.)

In the past the strong Chad could easily overpower women and rape them, but that wasn't necessary as the women naturally flocked to him.

Undoubtedly human males have evolutionary programming disposing them towards rape in the right social context, which is why women are so afraid all the time. However, I don't believe Chad could away with rape easily even in the ancestral environment because raping a chick in your tribe would risk instigating violence with her male relatives. Even in the ancestral environment female sexuality had a lot of value and you could not take it willy nilly without exchange, though you're also right that reciprocal sexual choice occurred between the typical woman and Chads.

But when it was necessary to rape a female from another tribe he could easily do so and the woman would be stuck with his child.

Indeed. I think rapes were common in the ancestral environment after warfare between tribes. The women most at risk of sexual violence were the ones from tribes whose male members got wiped out. In general, women without male relatives were simply at greater risk of sexual violence. But this is why evolutionary psychology is so intriguing, because women might also have evolved to behave in such a way as to minimize the risk they faced if they lost their male protection. This is called the "war brides" syndrome. You know how a woman can completely shift her loyalty from one man to another? Well if all their male relatives get taken out in some war, reproductively viable foids will just transfer their loyalty to the conquering tribe. For the sake of their own survival they have evolved to be easily able to shift their loyalty to the conquering tribe. Isn't that fucked up? A relatively recent example is French women eagerly fucking Nazis.

But women have to spend 9 months pregnant. Women in the past (default state of humanity) didn't have access to maternity and childbirth assistance. They would more often than not die, as they were a big fat slow-moving target, or simply died during childbirth. Thus they wanted to make sure to at least carry Chad's seed to term, even if she dies her genes live on in Chad's son. She obviously did not want to carry an incel's seed to childbirth to then die and have an incel born.

Just like in our other ape cousins (we humans are apes as well) as well as other species, the Chad alpha males control harems and gets exclusive rights to breed with all females, keeping the incel virgin beta males from breeding. Likewise did our ancient human ancestors do. The Chad alpha male(s) would have privileged breeding and sex rights, meanwhile the beta males would be lucky to get pity sex if anything.

This is really crude reasoning though I sympathize with the intent of your argument. I'm too lazy to "fisk" the rest of it. I'm gonna go play some vidya.

 

[Deleted member 677]

I agree but this was a really dumb explanation. No sources, no new facts, and hastily-made conclusions.

 

[diogenes]

I agree but this was a really dumb explanation. No sources, no new facts, and hastily-made conclusions.

I'm not writing a paper on evolutionary psychology, I was making a post on incels.is.

Anyway everything I said is common sense and would never come out of the mouth of scientists because it's not reputable to have such articles on your record.

 

[fOreVER]

Islam or nothing

 

[GeneticDysfunction]

Nuke the world

 

[Deleted member 5861]

I agree but this was a really dumb explanation. No sources, no new facts, and hastily-made conclusions.

tfw you need a source to prove that women go through pregnancy for 9 months

 

[Deleted member 10531]

Hmm, what about "muh polygamy", "fucking every hot woman", sounds pretty polygamous to me.

I thought this site hated that shit

 

[KingChemist]

Yep.

 

[th62eathhts2]

If we exist back then , or if we where animals we would be Ωmegas. But back then you could rape or start your own pack.

For over a millennium the capacity to do violence trumped facial attraction.

 

[Deleted member 1060]

cucktears will even deny the existence of gravity to push their agenda.

 

[Kirito3]

I agree but this was a really dumb explanation. No sources, no new facts, and hastily-made conclusions.

It’s basic natural selection, you could find it in any 9-12 grade biology textbook.

 

[PaganaMacka]

CuckTears will deny this by saying "muh morality" or "muh proggressive society"

And then demonize us & assume we don't deserve sex because of our personalities, which they can't even see

 

[Deleted member 1252]

Old news but yes, all true.

 

[Phallusy]

Orangutans are the closest mammals to humans. They are the most intelligent primates, they have the slowest known life histories of any mammal. They take the longest time to grow up (long childhoods) and they are the slowest to reproduce. Menstual cycles, pregnancy and birth is about the same length as a human female. Female orangutans reach sexual maturity at approximately 12-13, years old (similar to a human female), but they will often have their first offspring at about 15-16 years of age. Some even have them late on until about age 20. Sexual active cycle is very similar to that of a human femoid.

Now here's the BRUTAL BLACKPILL in all this!!!!!

Male orangutans exhibit a curious and little-understood case of “bimaturism,” also referred to as “arrested development.” This means that there are two “types” of mature male orangutans: flanged and unflanged males.

A flanged male has big cheek pads on the sides of his face and a large pendulous throat sack under his chin. An unflanged male has neither of these traits, and his body is usually smaller. Unflanged males ARE sexually mature and FULLY ABLE to father offspring; females, however, seem to prefer to mate with the flanged males. Because of this, unflanged males often resort to “forceful copulation” (basically, rape) in order to attain matings.

Some orangutan males take way longer than others to become flanged, who others NEVER become flanged at all; They remain unflanged their entire lives. Scientist will sometimes label an unflanged mature male as an "unfortunate male".

So think about those wide, fat cheek flaps and large throat sacs alpha orangutan males possess as the handsome jawline/chin, browridge and robust skull that human Chads possess. Similar to orangutans, humans also have more than one type of male. Many human males also suffer from "arrested development", and some endure their entire lives that way.

Remember, those orange great apes aren't that far from us, and observe how their fems only want the Chadatang. The article also states that the flanged adult male's "participation in social groups is usually limited to temporary sexual “consortships” with adult and adolescent females. Wild orangutan fathers play no direct role in the upbringing of their offspring."
https://orangutan.org/orangutan-facts/orangutan-behavior/

That's the link for my post above

 

[Deleted member 10314]

Humans are still primitive animals.

 

[mentalcel]

You would be able to rape/pregnate women in that time when chad is not around. In many cultures when this happened that "couple" had to marry. This was an undesired thing but was not a huge crime. The only problem with this was the girl's family were not able to choose who she will marry with if she gets raped. It really didn't matter much what kind of men women wanted until a very recent era because men were able to get what they want by using their power. Especially wealthy families didn't want their daughters to choose chad. They forced her to marry another wealthy man which can betabux her so that wealth can be preserved rather than used up by a broke chad. Looks and physical power didn't mean that much because we were civilized.

 

[diogenes]

I just realized my shitpost has been stickied/pinned JFL. I feel honored.

Humans are still primitive animals.

That's right. What I hate is how IT reddit leftists can be so hypocritical.

 

[Ascent God]

If we let nature run lose the average beta male is fucked...

 

[Weed]

Yes, just the truth of our nature. Women reproduce with high hierarchy only and even now, to make strong children for the future

Old news but yes, all true.

Humans are still primitive animals.

We are. And even if we are not primite, we are still animals controlled by our instincts

 

[Robtical]

Most the time they don't have chad's baby because of birth control and abortion, so they're going against nature according to this. Men can go against nature if the foids can, hopefully they'll end up enslaving or controlling them at least. New inventions and the negatives of femoid entitlement will make taking power away from them the only option.