R
RageAgainstTDL
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2017
- Posts
- 6,888
Do you ever wonder why you can see fat Chads who still pick up hot girls? And yet ripped manlets are fucked no matter what they do?
It's a basic principle we've talked about here before - women are gene detectors. They do not care about anything you can easily change because that does not represent your core genes.
Within basic normal ranges:
- Your clothes don't matter.
- Your hairstyle doesn't matter.
- Your job doesn't matter.
- Your money doesn't matter.
- Your physical fitness doesn't matter.
- How good of a person you are doesn't matter.
I mean - those things DO matter, but negligibly because anyone can change any of them if they really want and work hard. Women don't want men who "work hard." They want men who are genetically gifted in ways that hard work can't match.
Ie. Height/face/race.
Just found a study which describes the rationale for this depressingly enough. They are explaining why in their study facial attractiveness was most desired (by both men and women) over body attractiveness.
Quotes:
In other words, the entire concept of "self improvement" like the red pill or normies advocate is based on a flawed principle. By definition if you have a bad face you will always be polishing a turd, which is of course an act of futility. Suifuel for those of us with shit faces. But it is what it is and I think we all know this intuitively.
It's a basic principle we've talked about here before - women are gene detectors. They do not care about anything you can easily change because that does not represent your core genes.
Within basic normal ranges:
- Your clothes don't matter.
- Your hairstyle doesn't matter.
- Your job doesn't matter.
- Your money doesn't matter.
- Your physical fitness doesn't matter.
- How good of a person you are doesn't matter.
I mean - those things DO matter, but negligibly because anyone can change any of them if they really want and work hard. Women don't want men who "work hard." They want men who are genetically gifted in ways that hard work can't match.
Ie. Height/face/race.
Just found a study which describes the rationale for this depressingly enough. They are explaining why in their study facial attractiveness was most desired (by both men and women) over body attractiveness.
Quotes:
- The face advertises masculinity/femininity (Little, Jones, Penton-Voak, Burt, & Perrett, 2002), phenotypic quality, and resistance to developmental assaults, pathogens, and environmental stressors (Thornhill & Gangestad, 1994), and facial symmetry is associated with increased cognitive performance, greater genetic heterozygostity, greater fecundity, better health, increased longevity, lower parasite load, and lower rates of depression (Kowner, 2001).
- It appears as though both sexes want a long-term mate who has an attractive face over an attractive body. The information carried in a face signals developmental stability, resistance to pathogens, and phenotypic quality (Thornhill & Gangestad, 1994).
- Although facial attractiveness is surely important for short-term mates, it appears to be more valued in long-term mates by both sexes.
- A body may be more easily changed via diet and exercise whereas the structural traits of the face are resistant to change beyond drastic plastic surgery procedures. Stated another way, the face may be a better or more reliable cue to important phenotypic qualities despite the correlation between having a quality body and face (Thornhill & Moller, 1997).
- Jonason PK, Raulston T, Rotolo A. 2012. More Than Just a Pretty Face and a Hot Body: Multiple Cues in Mate-Choice. The Journal of Social Psychology. 152(2): 174–184.
In other words, the entire concept of "self improvement" like the red pill or normies advocate is based on a flawed principle. By definition if you have a bad face you will always be polishing a turd, which is of course an act of futility. Suifuel for those of us with shit faces. But it is what it is and I think we all know this intuitively.
Last edited: