B
bonesmashing
There's no inhib-level for your face.
★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
- Posts
- 339
Religious women are just women with the added caveat of having an extra element of "purity standards" AKA more standards and more expectations. Instead of a "good man" they need "a religious 'good man'" and can leverage their purity bullshit standards upon judging, deflecting or assessing people and their "virtues" by casting BS. Now instead of being lookists they can be lookists + religious moralist cunts.
Instead of just wanting a good looking guy or a guy that meets their looks threshold, they also can add the "but he isn't religious so it won't work" addendum. That means now he can be "not good looking enough" or "not religious enough" or "not Godly enough" & more standards.
So that means many women who will still probably fuck Chads, or have even higher standards like requiring him "share her faith" and so much other bullshit or else they will just end up jumping ship, complaining like a le "femcel" because she cannot get mr. perfect Christian cuck to want to "share her beliefs of God" or other nonsense. They often want dumb men to take advantage of also, which is bad beyond just high looks expectations.
At least less religious or non-religious have a lower standard outside of looks, but religious women can add looks + religious beliefs + "muh pure Christian boyfriend" BS. They want to use their position as a way to look more valuable, AKA expects some richcuck or beta Christcuck.
So it's a gatekeeper not only regarding their normal standards for sex but then a relationship, i.e., they can stay single and claim it's because "no guy is religious" or "cannot find muh perfect Christian boyfriend cuck" or etc. Religious women also seemingly end up with more betabux type doofuses they want to dominate in LTRs. They either hide their fucking, or turn to religion after "done with sex" & want an ATM Christian.
At least less religious women, at least if not outright whores to the max, are more sensible while "religion" just adds another layer of bullshit standards and a moral high ground where the woman sees herself as some mighty and moral cunt; much more bullshit when less religious women at least don't claim moral high ground this way. They may still be cunts, but at least they have less of a moral high ground to stand on.
Because religion gave them some "standard" it's literally a tactic women can use to claim moral superiority and demand a "morally superior" boyfriend. The problem is to these women "moral superiority" just means some dumb cuck who does everything and at the end of the day claims to be a religiontard just like her. She wants him to be a "man of God" AKA a dumbcuck who won't leave her & will serve her no matter what.
Having morals, common sense and ethics in any sort does not necessarily equate to religious identity BS many whores stand under as a way to have more standards and more icks/disqualifications and ways to pass judgment unto men and people and society, because she's "pure" and "of God" so she needs a more "Godly man." Godly man = cuck; a man who won't cheat, won't leave her, will obey her, will "be a real man."
Instead of just wanting a good looking guy or a guy that meets their looks threshold, they also can add the "but he isn't religious so it won't work" addendum. That means now he can be "not good looking enough" or "not religious enough" or "not Godly enough" & more standards.
So that means many women who will still probably fuck Chads, or have even higher standards like requiring him "share her faith" and so much other bullshit or else they will just end up jumping ship, complaining like a le "femcel" because she cannot get mr. perfect Christian cuck to want to "share her beliefs of God" or other nonsense. They often want dumb men to take advantage of also, which is bad beyond just high looks expectations.
At least less religious or non-religious have a lower standard outside of looks, but religious women can add looks + religious beliefs + "muh pure Christian boyfriend" BS. They want to use their position as a way to look more valuable, AKA expects some richcuck or beta Christcuck.
So it's a gatekeeper not only regarding their normal standards for sex but then a relationship, i.e., they can stay single and claim it's because "no guy is religious" or "cannot find muh perfect Christian boyfriend cuck" or etc. Religious women also seemingly end up with more betabux type doofuses they want to dominate in LTRs. They either hide their fucking, or turn to religion after "done with sex" & want an ATM Christian.
At least less religious women, at least if not outright whores to the max, are more sensible while "religion" just adds another layer of bullshit standards and a moral high ground where the woman sees herself as some mighty and moral cunt; much more bullshit when less religious women at least don't claim moral high ground this way. They may still be cunts, but at least they have less of a moral high ground to stand on.
Because religion gave them some "standard" it's literally a tactic women can use to claim moral superiority and demand a "morally superior" boyfriend. The problem is to these women "moral superiority" just means some dumb cuck who does everything and at the end of the day claims to be a religiontard just like her. She wants him to be a "man of God" AKA a dumbcuck who won't leave her & will serve her no matter what.
Having morals, common sense and ethics in any sort does not necessarily equate to religious identity BS many whores stand under as a way to have more standards and more icks/disqualifications and ways to pass judgment unto men and people and society, because she's "pure" and "of God" so she needs a more "Godly man." Godly man = cuck; a man who won't cheat, won't leave her, will obey her, will "be a real man."
Last edited: