L
Normalfags say that and then they also say "What do you bring to the table?" or "What can/do you offer?" - so they admit that we are right in one second and then in the other we are called socio-/psychopaths for saying how the world functions. It doesn't matter what the opposition says - it just matters that the wrong/evil side says it and this automatically triggers a reflex to disagree.
And yes, every relationship is in the end reciprocal (which means transactional; you give and you take) - because everything else is parasitism. And yes, patience has its limits and I expect something back when I do something for others - and when they don't reciprocate that I will stop to give a fuck about them (like every other human being on the planet, but when an ugly male does it it is seen as problematic/abusive/etc.).
They pathologize every ounce of normal humanity within their opposition and fail to see that everybody behaves/thinks like we do (but just not consciously or with that amount of honesty).
Every relationship (including that of children and parents) is transactional, you do something for them (give them good grades, work, get a good degree, provide for them in age) and you get something back (food, shelter). Nothing more is there to be found. Even in nature selfishness doesn't exist, there is kin altruism (you do something for your relatives to further your own alleles in that indirect manner) and reciprocal altruism (you do something and get something back) and symbiosis (which is nothing more than reciprocal exploitation) - everything far too romanticized in the documentaries that they watch. Even when you donate money to a homeless person you do it for your own emotional gratification and the temporal emotional relief associated with the feeling of being a good person because simply materialistically speaking a few cents won't make a difference between a beggar and a well-respected citizen and this is something everyone knows.
In the end everything you do means that you get something back (be it something emotional in the sense of fullfillment of the soul or something materialistic) - someone that claims that he doesn't think in that transactional and goal-oriented manner deep down is either a) a human doormat that invites exploitation and abuse (e.g. what they want ugly males to be) or b) a lier. Selfishness is a trait inherent to all living beings and normalfags just hate it when you are honest about it because what would that mean for their own facade of the all-loving good guy?
And no: It isn't capitalism that makes people think like that, it is how every living thing thinks (or at least acts), constructivism is nothing more than a mental disease of humanity that tries to wash away all the negatively perceived aspects of the human nature in a moralistic fallacy (e.g. what's against my morals musn't exist) - and yes, even under your system some people would still treat others with disdain and contempt or simply would refuse to participate in your so(y)ciety - now what? Are you going to force them and then reveal that you think what everyone else thinks deep down (e.g. "Might makes right") and/or will you let them perservere and in the end overcome you thereby nullifying your own goals. Confronted with a mindset like that you are a) either forced to abandon your so-called morals and show your true face to the world or b) bow down (thereby nullifying all your previous efforts) - so or so: In the end you lose by either betraying your ideals/values or by simply being subjugated/replaced by someone or something new.
And yes, every relationship is in the end reciprocal (which means transactional; you give and you take) - because everything else is parasitism. And yes, patience has its limits and I expect something back when I do something for others - and when they don't reciprocate that I will stop to give a fuck about them (like every other human being on the planet, but when an ugly male does it it is seen as problematic/abusive/etc.).
They pathologize every ounce of normal humanity within their opposition and fail to see that everybody behaves/thinks like we do (but just not consciously or with that amount of honesty).
Every relationship (including that of children and parents) is transactional, you do something for them (give them good grades, work, get a good degree, provide for them in age) and you get something back (food, shelter). Nothing more is there to be found. Even in nature selfishness doesn't exist, there is kin altruism (you do something for your relatives to further your own alleles in that indirect manner) and reciprocal altruism (you do something and get something back) and symbiosis (which is nothing more than reciprocal exploitation) - everything far too romanticized in the documentaries that they watch. Even when you donate money to a homeless person you do it for your own emotional gratification and the temporal emotional relief associated with the feeling of being a good person because simply materialistically speaking a few cents won't make a difference between a beggar and a well-respected citizen and this is something everyone knows.
In the end everything you do means that you get something back (be it something emotional in the sense of fullfillment of the soul or something materialistic) - someone that claims that he doesn't think in that transactional and goal-oriented manner deep down is either a) a human doormat that invites exploitation and abuse (e.g. what they want ugly males to be) or b) a lier. Selfishness is a trait inherent to all living beings and normalfags just hate it when you are honest about it because what would that mean for their own facade of the all-loving good guy?
And no: It isn't capitalism that makes people think like that, it is how every living thing thinks (or at least acts), constructivism is nothing more than a mental disease of humanity that tries to wash away all the negatively perceived aspects of the human nature in a moralistic fallacy (e.g. what's against my morals musn't exist) - and yes, even under your system some people would still treat others with disdain and contempt or simply would refuse to participate in your so(y)ciety - now what? Are you going to force them and then reveal that you think what everyone else thinks deep down (e.g. "Might makes right") and/or will you let them perservere and in the end overcome you thereby nullifying your own goals. Confronted with a mindset like that you are a) either forced to abandon your so-called morals and show your true face to the world or b) bow down (thereby nullifying all your previous efforts) - so or so: In the end you lose by either betraying your ideals/values or by simply being subjugated/replaced by someone or something new.
Last edited:
