Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Rejecting foids below your looksmatch doesnt make you volcel

  • Thread starter Deleted member 21219
  • Start date
Deleted member 21219

Deleted member 21219

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
11,218
It makes you a man of reasonable standards. Regardless of what some cels preach here, i would never tough a foid below my looks level.
 
It makes you a man of reasonable standards. Regardless of what some cels preach here, i would never tough a foid below my looks level.
You would never "tough" a foid? That's a new one ngl
 
Dis gon be good 2
Dis gon be good
5 page thread incoming
@Hate_my_life thoughts? :feelsPop:
 
They just can't be whales or have kids
 
Completely agree, but all the foid worshippers with no self-respect here will be angry about this. "You're not entitled to basic standards, inkwell! You should just accept whatever disgusting scraps you can get!!!" :soy:
 
That denies the current state of the sexual market. If you say this knowing your looksmatch will never be interested in you, you are volcelish. You are not entitled to your looksmatch, inkwell!

I only care about what i desire. Whether i get it or not is another story. Foids below my looksmatch are puke inducing and id rather die alone.
Completely agree, but all the foid worshippers with no self-respect here will be angry about this. "You're not entitled to basic standards, inkwell! You should just accept whatever disgusting scraps you can get!!!" :soy:

Just eat shit to satisfy your hunger bro. These are the same morons who would eventually end up taking landwhales on dates and paying for their huge meals JFL.
 
It makes you a man of reasonable standards. Regardless of what some cels preach here, i would never tough a foid below my looks level.
Show me your perceived curry looksmatch.
 
yes it does, gtfo volcel normie
 
foids reject their literal looksmatch but no one says shit or calls them volcel
 
Show me your perceived curry looksmatch.

Prolly below (from google images). Note shed go down 2 points without fakeup.


images

That's exactly what they think of us. So isn't that like accepting out our situation? If you accept it, aren't you volcel? (I'm asking this out of rhetoric, I know you are not volcel, muh boyo).

Ive alrdy accepted my situation.
foids reject their literal looksmatch but no one says shit or calls them volcel

Cucks tbh. Anyone who advocates dumpster diving on here should be banned.
 
Last edited:
I've never been in the position of rejecting the least physically attractive women [it's always them rejecting me - albeit mostly on dating sites/apps] so I can't really imagine this scenario.
 
Sadly I have to agree with you here 100%.
 
View attachment 342017 View attachment 3420185 page thread incoming
@Hate_my_life thoughts? :feelsPop:
I've just woke up so won't expand on my point any further.

I agree that you're not Volcel for rejecting a foid below your looksmatch, but as you're all aware majority of this forum can not rate for shit.
For example, there have been many white"""cels""" who'd put a 7/10 Black foid on the same level as a 2/10 white landwhale and because they are a "4/10 manlet" would class the 7/10 Black foid as "below their looksmatch":feelstastyman:

I can bet you there's some phaggot who'll regard someone like Scarlet Johansen (in her prime) as their looksmatch because they're so delusional when it comes to rating. They perputate the stereotype that Incels only want stacies.

Thumb candle indicates smelly room 2 10 would not bang outdated furniture 49239267


Now everyone has subjective preferences and I respect that. Some cels like slimmer women, some cels like thicker women, some cels prefer large ties, some prefer larger ass etc. It's not set in stone. That's why it's "Hard" to concretely rate someone because their own preferences can influence the view of the individual.
But OBJECTIVELY, I've seen many phaggots rate foids who are OBJECTIVELY 5/10+ as sub-3. Those are fakecels who need to be banned.

Note shed go down 2 points without fakeup.
:feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously: :feelsseriously:

Lemme guess. She's a 3/10 without makeup!?

Its too early for this...
I've never been in the position of rejecting the least physically attractive women [it's always them rejecting me - albeit mostly on dating sites/apps] so I can't really imagine this scenario.
This.

Would you reject these foids.

average-woman-body.jpg
article-2287411-062DA4E3000005DC-115_306x423.jpg
They are at least twice my age but I wouldn't reject.
 
If you wouldn't date a 4 or below, you are volcel.
If you are a 5 or above, you are volcel.
It's simple as long as you know how to rate yourself and others. Though considering you're a tallfag you probably overestimate yourself.
 
Just be careful with these types of posts they can be perceived as brag
 
If you wouldn't date a 4 or below, you are volcel.
If you are a 5 or above, you are volcel.
It's simple as long as you know how to rate yourself and others. Though considering you're a tallfag you probably overestimate yourself.

Like i said, if iam a 5, i want a foid whos a 5 (without makeup btw, some of you cucks dont account for fake up)
 
Rich of you to be in a position to dictate standards on yourself. I can understand some basic looks thresholds of attractiveness which one might not go down on for example age or weight but the fact that you even consider for one SINGLE FUCKING second that you have the option of dating across or up already tells me all I need to know about you.
 
Wholeheartedly agree tbh. I don't want to fuck a woman that doesn't even look like a woman. I have low standards.
 
Rich of you to be in a position to dictate standards on yourself. I can understand some basic looks thresholds of attractiveness which one might not go down on for example age or weight but the fact that you even consider for one SINGLE FUCKING second that you have the option of dating across or up already tells me all I need to know about you.

If you dont have standards, you become a hypergamy enabling cuck yourself. Rich of you to bitch about hypergamy while enabling it.
 
If you dont have standards, you become a hypergamy enabling cuck yourself. Rich of you to bitch about hypergamy while enabling it.

Idc about hypergamy I just want a gf
 
Saying that she has to be a looksmatch is stretching it a bit. If she is 3/10 and you are 4/10 it's still quite reasonable if she is not a totalcuntwhore.

But you need to have some standards. You can't tell a slightly below average guy to fuck disabled 1/10 disfigured freak
 
Idc about hypergamy I just want a gf

Ok. Time to dumpster dive then. Your 300 lb whale with a pussy that hasnt been cleaned since the early 2000s is waiting for you.
 
Ok. Time to dumpster dive then. Your 300 lb whale with a pussy that hasnt been cleaned since the early 2000s is waiting for you.

I already said there are standards like weight and age I would not fuck a landwhale ever because what's the point if I can't be attracted to her. But to reject a normal weight girl just because she is normie or below average looking is volcel as fuck. I do not even have an opportunity to reject anybody how can anyone even make such standards and claim he is incel.
 
I already said there are standards like weight and age I would not fuck a landwhale ever because what's the point if I can't be attracted to her. But to reject a normal weight girl just because she is normie or below average looking is volcel as fuck. I do not even have an opportunity to reject anybody how can anyone even make such standards and claim he is incel.

I cant find a girl whos attractive to me and hence incel.
 
I'm fine with that, women do this all the time and cucks never argue with them about whatever lable they give themselves in the process.

There are women out there that fuck men that they find attractive, but still call themselves lesbian, for example.
 
Agreed. She should be looksmatch not below
 
Prolly below (from google images). Note shed go down 2 points without fakeup.


images



Ive alrdy accepted my situation.


Cucks tbh. Anyone who advocates dumpster diving on here should be banned.
Im almost certain that she is not your looksmatch. She most likely mogs you tbh
 
99%+ of this forum are standardcels to one extent or another so there is no need to defend your position except it greatly enhance your chance of being involuntary celibate for a long long time, if not forever.

if you are a Chad at 8 , and only go for your looks match and higher, your potential partners are less than 1% of all foids
if you are a 5 and only go for your looks match and higher, you just wiped out 70% of the foids dating pool.

a standardcel can also make the standard that he would only date/mate with foids of his own ethnic group/race /culture etc...
depending on his respective race, he can be rejecting 80% of all foids population.

i have met black sexhavers and they say they prefer black foids only , of course they are at least high tier normies/ tyrone lite and they can choose their preference and still get sex from black women.

it is just illogical for incel tier men to have looksmatch standard or any sort of lofty standard such as Elliot Rodger wanting 6+ stacylite/stacies.
 
Last edited:
Just eat shit to satisfy your hunger bro. These are the same morons who would eventually end up taking landwhales on dates and paying for their huge meals JFL.

Imagine having to the foot the bill for a dinner date with her and she thinks you're nice, but doesn't think there's chemistry between you two (yeah, bitch all of the chemistry is happening in your intestinal tract). It would be cheaper to get a whore.

ConfusedSoulfulAracari-size_restricted.gif
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top